Suppr超能文献

以人为中心的临床决策支持设计流程:肺栓塞案例研究。

Human-centred design processes for clinical decision support: A pulmonary embolism case study.

机构信息

W21C Research and Innovation Centre, GD01, TRW Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.

W21C Research and Innovation Centre, GD01, TRW Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2020 Oct;142:104196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104196. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) can make patient care more efficient, cost-effective, and guideline-concordant. Many are created by clinicians who understand the challenges, but may publish concepts before considering subtle but important design details. Human-Centred Design (HCD) approaches provide necessary methods ensuring solid CDSS design. This article highlights HCD approaches in a pulmonary embolism CDSS case study context.

METHODS

This pulmonary embolism CDSS results from collaborative work between computer science, psychology, and medicine. HCD methods used include: evaluations of pre-clinical prototype recordings, iterative usability expert reviews with software refinement, formative usability testing, and (separately-published) clinical pilot study.

RESULTS

HCD methods were instrumental in iteratively creating an easy to use and functionally-sound CDSS. Retrospective evaluations revealed that participants spent considerable time on items that were out of order from natural cognitive diagnostic workflows. Features missing between original and study version were noted, confusing interface elements reworked, and currently-active decision tree branches were visually emphasized. From iterative usability reviews, positioning of information within the decision tree was radically reworked, information separated into levels of support for different user groups, and supportive versus directive language issues addressed. Formative studies identified issues such as interface adjustments and hospital workflow integration.

CONCLUSIONS

Human-centred design approaches provide methods for integrating the skills and knowledge of many disciplines, illustrated by example in this pulmonary embolism CDSS creation. Advantages of leveraging many design guidelines as well as revealing new design considerations that would otherwise have remained hidden are described. The findings reported here support future CDSS design through HCD inclusion.

摘要

背景

临床决策支持系统(CDSS)可以提高医疗效率、降低成本并提高指南一致性。许多 CDSS 是由了解挑战的临床医生创建的,但他们可能在考虑微妙但重要的设计细节之前就发布了概念。以人为中心的设计(HCD)方法提供了必要的方法,确保了 CDSS 的稳健设计。本文以肺栓塞 CDSS 案例研究为背景,重点介绍了 HCD 方法。

方法

该肺栓塞 CDSS 是计算机科学、心理学和医学合作的成果。使用的 HCD 方法包括:对临床前原型记录进行评估、迭代可用性专家评审和软件改进、形成性可用性测试,以及(单独发表的)临床试点研究。

结果

HCD 方法在反复创建易于使用且功能健全的 CDSS 方面发挥了重要作用。回顾性评估显示,参与者在与自然认知诊断工作流程不符的项目上花费了大量时间。注意到原始版本和研究版本之间缺少的功能、重新设计混淆的界面元素,并突出当前活动的决策树分支。通过迭代可用性审查,对决策树中的信息进行了彻底的重新布局,将信息按不同用户群体的支持级别进行了划分,并解决了支持性和指令性语言问题。形成性研究确定了界面调整和医院工作流程集成等问题。

结论

以人为中心的设计方法提供了整合多学科技能和知识的方法,以肺栓塞 CDSS 创作为例进行了说明。描述了利用许多设计准则的优势,以及揭示否则可能隐藏的新设计考虑因素。这里报告的研究结果支持通过 HCD 纳入进行未来的 CDSS 设计。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验