Lee Yoon Heui, Choi Hanna, Lee Soo-Kyoung
Department of Nursing, Graduate School, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Department of Nursing Science, Nambu University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 8;9:e67272. doi: 10.2196/67272.
The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) requires new approaches for human-AI interfaces that are different from classic human-computer interfaces. In developing a system that is conducive to the analysis and use of health big data (HBD), reflecting the empirical characteristics of users who have performed HBD analysis is the most crucial aspect to consider. Recently, human-centered design methodology, a field of user-centered design, has been expanded and is used not only to develop types of products but also technologies and services.
This study was conducted to integrate and analyze users' experiences along the HBD analysis journey using the human-centered design methodology and reflect them in the development of AI agents that support future HBD analysis. This research aims to help accelerate the development of novel human-AI interfaces for AI agents that support the analysis and use of HBD, which will be urgently needed in the near future.
Using human-centered design methodology, we collected data through shadowing and in-depth interviews with 16 people with experience in analyzing and using HBD. We identified users' empirical characteristics, emotions, pain points, and needs related to HBD analysis and use and created personas and journey maps.
The general characteristics of participants (n=16) were as follows: the majority were in their 40s (n=6, 38%) and held a PhD degree (n=10, 63%). Professors (n=7, 44%) and health care personnel (n=10, 63%) represented the largest professional groups. Participants' experiences with big data analysis varied, with 25% (n=4) being beginners and 38% (n=6) having extensive experience. Common analysis methods included statistical analysis (n=7, 44%) and data mining (n=6, 38%). Qualitative findings from shadowing and in-depth interviews revealed key challenges: lack of knowledge on using analytical solutions, crisis management difficulties during errors, and inadequate understanding of health care data and clinical decision-making, especially among non-health care professionals. Three types of personas and journey maps-health care professionals as big data analysis beginners, health care professionals who have experience in big data analytics, and non-health care professionals who are experts in big data analytics-were derived. They showed a need for personalized platforms tailored to the user level, appropriate direction through a navigation function, a crisis management support system, communication and sharing among users, and expert linkage service.
The knowledge obtained from this study can be leveraged in designing an AI agent to support future HBD analysis and use. This is expected to further increase the usability of HBD by helping users perform effective use of HBD more easily.
人工智能(AI)的迅速发展需要全新的人机交互方式,这与传统的人机界面有所不同。在开发一个有助于健康大数据(HBD)分析和使用的系统时,反映进行过HBD分析的用户的经验特征是最关键的考虑因素。最近,以用户为中心的设计领域中的以人为本的设计方法得到了扩展,不仅用于开发各类产品,还用于技术和服务的开发。
本研究旨在运用以人为本的设计方法,整合和分析用户在HBD分析过程中的体验,并将其反映在支持未来HBD分析的人工智能代理的开发中。本研究旨在帮助加速开发支持HBD分析和使用的人工智能代理的新型人机界面,这在不久的将来将是迫切需要的。
我们运用以人为本的设计方法,通过对16位有HBD分析和使用经验的人员进行跟踪观察和深入访谈来收集数据。我们确定了用户与HBD分析和使用相关的经验特征、情感、痛点和需求,并创建了用户角色和旅程地图。
参与者(n = 16)的一般特征如下:大多数为40多岁(n = 6,38%),拥有博士学位(n = 10,63%)。教授(n = 7,44%)和医护人员(n = 10,63%)是最大的专业群体。参与者的大数据分析经验各不相同,25%(n = 4)为初学者,38%(n = 6)有丰富经验。常见的分析方法包括统计分析(n = 7,44%)和数据挖掘(n = 6,38%)。跟踪观察和深入访谈的定性结果揭示了关键挑战:缺乏使用分析解决方案的知识、错误发生时的危机管理困难,以及对医疗数据和临床决策的理解不足,尤其是在非医护专业人员中。得出了三种类型的用户角色和旅程地图——作为大数据分析初学者的医护人员、有大数据分析经验的医护人员以及大数据分析专家的非医护专业人员。他们表明需要针对用户水平量身定制的个性化平台、通过导航功能提供的适当指导、危机管理支持系统、用户之间的沟通与共享以及专家联动服务。
本研究获得的知识可用于设计支持未来HBD分析和使用的人工智能代理。预计这将通过帮助用户更轻松地有效使用HBD进一步提高HBD的可用性。