Exercise Biology Research Group (BioEx), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Metabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, Londrina State University, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Jun 1;36(6):1582-1590. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003768. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
Carneiro, MAS, de Oliveira Júnior, GN, de Sousa, JFR, Murta, EFC, Orsatti, CL, Michelin, MA, Cyrino, ES, and Orsatti, FL. Effects of resistance training at different loads on inflammatory biomarkers, muscle mass, muscular strength, and physical performance in postmenopausal women. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1582-1590, 2022-It has been suggested that the effect of resistance training (RT) on circulating proinflammatory biomarkers may be dependent on muscle mass gain. A few recent studies have suggested that lower-load RT (LLRT; loads <50% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM] and repetition performed until, or close to, voluntary concentric failure) may be superior to higher-load RT (HLRT; loads >70% of 1RM) in increasing muscle mass. Hence, this study aimed to test whether LLRT is superior to HLRT for increasing muscle mass (total fat-free mass [TFFM] and leg fat-free mass [LFFM]) and improving circulating inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin [IL]-6, IL1-ra, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, and extracellular heat shock protein [eHSP]70) in postmenopausal women (PW) (primary outcome). The secondary outcome was to compare the changes in muscular strength and physical performance (4-meter walking test [4-M], timed-up-and-go [TUG] test, and sit-to-stand [STS] test) between the LLRT and HLRT. The PW were randomized into 2 groups: LLRT (n = 14; loads necessary to perform 30-35 repetitions) and HLRT (n = 15; loads necessary to perform 8-12 repetitions). The greater magnitude of increase in LFFM (p = 0.033) was observed in LLRT when compared with HLRT. Moreover, there was a trend for a greater increase in TFFM in LLRT over HLRT (p = 0.070). However, there were similar improvements in TNF-α and muscular strength (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the RT schemes on IL-6, IL-1ra, and eHSP70 levels. Thus, although performing LLRT until, or close to, voluntary concentric failure seems to provide a greater stimulus for an increase in muscle mass than HLRT, it does not seem to affect the responses in circulating inflammatory biomarkers, muscular strength, and physical performance in PW.
卡内罗,MAS,德奥利维拉·儒尼奥尔,GN,德索萨,JFR,穆尔塔,EFC,奥尔萨蒂,CL,米歇林,MA,西里诺,ES,和奥尔萨蒂,FL。不同负荷的抗阻训练对绝经后妇女炎症生物标志物、肌肉质量、肌肉力量和身体表现的影响。J 力量与调理研究 36(6):1582-1590,2022-已经有人提出,抗阻训练(RT)对循环前炎症生物标志物的影响可能取决于肌肉质量的增加。最近的一些研究表明,低负荷 RT(LLRT;负荷<1 次重复最大值[1RM]的 50%,重复次数直至或接近自愿向心衰竭)可能优于高负荷 RT(HLRT;负荷>70%的 1RM)增加肌肉质量。因此,本研究旨在测试 LLRT 是否优于 HLRT 增加肌肉质量(总去脂体重[TFFM]和腿部去脂体重[LFFM])和改善循环炎症生物标志物(白细胞介素[IL]-6、IL1-ra、肿瘤坏死因子[TNF]-α和细胞外热休克蛋白[eHSP]70)在绝经后妇女(PW)(主要结果)。次要结果是比较 LLRT 和 HLRT 之间肌肉力量和身体表现(4 米步行测试[4-M]、计时起立行走测试[TUG]测试和坐站测试[STS]测试)的变化。PW 被随机分为 2 组:LLRT(n=14;完成 30-35 次重复所需的负荷)和 HLRT(n=15;完成 8-12 次重复所需的负荷)。与 HLRT 相比,LLRT 观察到 LFFM 增加幅度更大(p=0.033)。此外,LLRT 中 TFFM 的增加趋势大于 HLRT(p=0.070)。然而,TNF-α和肌肉力量的改善相似(p<0.001)。此外,两种 RT 方案在 IL-6、IL-1ra 和 eHSP70 水平上没有显著差异。因此,虽然进行直到或接近自愿向心衰竭的 LLRT 似乎比 HLRT 更能刺激肌肉质量增加,但它似乎不会影响 PW 中循环炎症生物标志物、肌肉力量和身体表现的反应。