Metabolism, Nutrition, and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Londrina, PR, BRAZIL.
Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Exercise Research Group (PhyNER), Exercise Biology Research Lab (BioEx), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, MG, BRAZIL.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023 Aug 1;55(8):1507-1523. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003176. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
In postmenopausal women, optimizing muscular strength and physical performance through proper resistance training (RT) is crucial in achieving optimal functional reserve later in life. This study aimed to compare if a higher-load-to-lower-load (HL-to-LL) scheme is more effective than a lower-load-to-higher-load (LL-to-HL) scheme on muscular strength and physical performance in postmenopausal women after 12 and 24 wk of RT.
Twenty-four postmenopausal women were randomized into two groups: LL-to-HL ( n = 12, 27-31 repetitions maximum (RM) in the first 12 wk, and 8-12RM in the last 12 wk) or HL-to-LL ( n = 12, 8-12RM during the first 12 wk, and 27-31RM in the last 12 wk). Muscular dynamic (1RM test) and isometric strength (MIVC) and functional tests (sit-to-stand power, 400-m walking, and 6-min walking) were analyzed at baseline, after 12 and 24 wk.
Different load intensity transition schemes resulted in enhancements ( P < 0.05) in dynamic (45° leg press: LL-to-HL = 21.98% vs HL-to-LL = 16.07%; leg extension: LL-to-HL = 23.25% vs HL-to-LL = 16.28%; leg curl: LL-to-HL = 23.89% vs HL-to-LL = 13.34%) and isometric strength (LL-to-HL = 14.63% vs HL-to-LL = 19.42%), sit-to-stand power (LL-to-HL = 7.32% vs HL-to-LL = 0%), and walking speed (400-m test: LL-to-HL = 3.30% vs HL-to-LL = 5.52%; 6-min test: LL-to-HL = 4.44% vs HL-to-LL = 5.55%) after 24 wk of RT, without differences between groups ( P > 0.05). However, only the HL increased the dynamic strength in 45° leg press and leg extension and sit-to-stand power. Moreover, walking speed changes were more strongly correlated with the changes in MIVC ( P < 0.05).
Our results indicate that both load intensity transition schemes produce similar improvements in muscular strength and physical performance in postmenopausal women after 24 wk of RT. However, the HL was more effective in increasing 45° leg press and leg extension strength, as well as power (mainly when performed after the LL), whereas having little effect on leg curl strength, isometric strength, and walking speed. Our findings suggest that although an HL makes a muscle isotonically stronger, it may have limited impact on isometric strength and walking speed in postmenopausal women.
在绝经后女性中,通过适当的抗阻训练(RT)优化肌肉力量和身体表现对于在以后的生活中获得最佳功能储备至关重要。本研究旨在比较高负荷到低负荷(HL-to-LL)方案与低负荷到高负荷(LL-to-HL)方案在绝经后女性接受 12 和 24 周 RT 后对肌肉力量和身体表现的影响。
将 24 名绝经后女性随机分为两组:LL-to-HL(n=12,前 12 周重复次数最大(RM)为 27-31 次,后 12 周为 8-12RM)或 HL-to-LL(n=12,前 12 周为 8-12RM,后 12 周为 27-31RM)。在基线、12 周和 24 周时,对肌肉动态(1RM 测试)和等长强度(MIVC)以及功能测试(坐站功率、400 米步行和 6 分钟步行)进行分析。
不同的负荷强度转换方案导致动态(45°腿推:LL-to-HL=21.98% vs HL-to-LL=16.07%;腿伸展:LL-to-HL=23.25% vs HL-to-LL=16.28%;腿弯举:LL-to-HL=23.89% vs HL-to-LL=13.34%)和等长强度(LL-to-HL=14.63% vs HL-to-LL=19.42%)、坐站功率(LL-to-HL=7.32% vs HL-to-LL=0%)和步行速度(400 米测试:LL-to-HL=3.30% vs HL-to-LL=5.52%;6 分钟测试:LL-to-HL=4.44% vs HL-to-LL=5.55%)在 24 周 RT 后均有显著提高(P<0.05),但两组之间无差异(P>0.05)。然而,只有 HL 增加了 45°腿推和腿伸展以及坐站功率的动态力量。此外,步行速度的变化与 MIVC 的变化更密切相关(P<0.05)。
我们的研究结果表明,两种负荷强度转换方案在绝经后女性接受 24 周 RT 后均能产生相似的肌肉力量和身体表现的改善。然而,HL 更有效地增加了 45°腿推和腿伸展的力量以及功率(主要是在进行 LL 之后),而对腿弯举力量、等长强度和步行速度的影响较小。我们的研究结果表明,尽管 HL 使肌肉等张更强,但它可能对绝经后女性的等长强度和步行速度影响有限。