• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dopaminergic Modulation of Human Intertemporal Choice: A Diffusion Model Analysis Using the D2-Receptor Antagonist Haloperidol.多巴胺能调节人类跨期选择:使用 D2 受体拮抗剂氟哌啶醇的扩散模型分析。
J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 7;40(41):7936-7948. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0592-20.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
2
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.时际与风险选择中的漂移扩散模型作为选择规则:内侧眶额皮层损伤患者与对照的病例研究。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 20;16(4):e1007615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007615. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
An improved within-session self-adjusting delay discounting procedure for the study of choice impulsivity in rats.一种改良的大鼠选择冲动性研究中的内次会话自我调整延迟折扣程序。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Jul;235(7):2123-2135. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4911-y. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Effects of a cafeteria diet on delay discounting in adolescent and adult rats: Alterations on dopaminergic sensitivity. cafeteria 饮食对青少年和成年大鼠延迟折扣的影响:多巴胺敏感性的改变。
J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Nov;31(11):1419-1429. doi: 10.1177/0269881117735750. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
5
Dopamine and acetylcholine have distinct roles in delay- and effort-based decision-making in humans.多巴胺和乙酰胆碱在人类的延迟和努力决策中扮演着不同的角色。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jul 12;22(7):e3002714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002714. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Involvement of dopamine D3 receptor in impulsive choice decision-making in male rats.多巴胺 D3 受体参与雄性大鼠冲动选择决策。
Neuropharmacology. 2024 Oct 1;257:110051. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110051. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
7
Decision making: effects of methylphenidate on temporal discounting in nonhuman primates.决策制定:哌甲酯对非人类灵长类动物时间折扣的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jul;114(1):70-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00278.2015. Epub 2015 May 13.
8
Haloperidol and rimonabant increase delay discounting in rats fed high-fat and standard-chow diets.氟哌啶醇和利莫那班增加了食用高脂和标准饲料的大鼠的延迟折扣。
Behav Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;25(8):705-16. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000058.
9
Dopaminergic function and intertemporal choice.多巴胺能功能与跨期选择。
Transl Psychiatry. 2015 Jan 6;5(1):e491. doi: 10.1038/tp.2014.133.
10
Dopaminergic modulation of the trade-off between probability and time in economic decision-making.经济决策中概率与时间权衡的多巴胺能调节
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Jun;25(6):817-27. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Balancing Risk and Reward: Dopamine's Central Role in Economic Decision-Making.权衡风险与回报:多巴胺在经济决策中的核心作用。
Brain Sci. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):857. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080857.
2
Erotic cue exposure increases neural reward responses without modulating temporal discounting.色情线索暴露会增加神经奖励反应,而不会调节时间折扣。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2023 Aug 18;1. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00008. eCollection 2023.
3
Differential Associations of Dopamine and Serotonin With Reward and Punishment Processes in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多巴胺和血清素与人类奖励和惩罚过程的差异关联:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0839.
4
Phenylketonuria as an Adherence Disease.苯丙酮尿症作为一种依从性疾病。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Apr 13;19:1059-1073. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S512719. eCollection 2025.
5
Neural reward system reflects individual value comparison strategy in cost-benefit decisions.神经奖励系统反映了个体在成本效益决策中的价值比较策略。
Commun Biol. 2024 Nov 12;7(1):1488. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07210-5.
6
Cross-species translational paradigms for assessing positive valence system as defined by the RDoC matrix.用于评估由研究领域标准矩阵(RDoC)定义的正性效价系统的跨物种转化范式。
J Neurochem. 2025 Jan;169(1):e16243. doi: 10.1111/jnc.16243. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
7
Dopamine and acetylcholine have distinct roles in delay- and effort-based decision-making in humans.多巴胺和乙酰胆碱在人类的延迟和努力决策中扮演着不同的角色。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jul 12;22(7):e3002714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002714. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Gambling Environment Exposure Increases Temporal Discounting but Improves Model-Based Control in Regular Slot-Machine Gamblers.接触赌博环境会增加时间折扣,但会改善经常玩老虎机的赌徒基于模型的控制能力。
Comput Psychiatr. 2022 Jul 5;6(1):142-165. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.84. eCollection 2022.
9
Decomposition of Reinforcement Learning Deficits in Disordered Gambling via Drift Diffusion Modeling and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.通过漂移扩散模型和功能磁共振成像分解无序赌博中强化学习缺陷
Comput Psychiatr. 2024 Mar 20;8(1):23-45. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.104. eCollection 2024.
10
Differences in Discounting Behavior and Brain Responses for Food and Money Reward.食物和金钱奖励的折扣行为和大脑反应的差异。
eNeuro. 2024 Apr 3;11(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0153-23.2024. Print 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Region-specific effects of acute haloperidol in the human midbrain, striatum and cortex.急性氟哌啶醇在人类中脑、纹状体和皮质中的区域特异性作用。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Jun;35:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 May 18.
2
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.时际与风险选择中的漂移扩散模型作为选择规则:内侧眶额皮层损伤患者与对照的病例研究。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 20;16(4):e1007615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007615. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-analysis.延迟折扣作为精神障碍共病过程的研究:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 1;76(11):1176-1186. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2102.
4
Dopamine Enhances Item Novelty Detection via Hippocampal and Associative Recall via Left Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Mechanisms.多巴胺通过海马体和左外侧前额叶皮层的联想回忆机制增强项目新颖性检测。
J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 2;39(40):7920-7933. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0495-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
Metoclopramide for the treatment of diabetic gastroparesis.甲氧氯普胺治疗糖尿病性胃轻瘫。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;13(8):711-721. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1645594. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
6
Baseline impulsivity may moderate L-DOPA effects on value-based decision-making.基线冲动性可能调节 L-DOPA 对基于价值的决策的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 4;9(1):5652. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42124-x.
7
A reinforcement learning diffusion decision model for value-based decisions.基于价值的决策的强化学习扩散决策模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Aug;26(4):1099-1121. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1554-2.
8
Improving the reliability of model-based decision-making estimates in the two-stage decision task with reaction-times and drift-diffusion modeling.使用反应时和漂移扩散建模改进两阶段决策任务中基于模型的决策估计的可靠性。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Feb 13;15(2):e1006803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006803. eCollection 2019 Feb.
9
L-DOPA reduces model-free control of behavior by attenuating the transfer of value to action.左旋多巴通过减弱价值向行动的传递来减少无模型控制行为。
Neuroimage. 2019 Feb 1;186:113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.075. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
10
Dopamine is a double-edged sword: dopaminergic modulation enhances memory retrieval performance but impairs metacognition.多巴胺是一把双刃剑:多巴胺能调制增强记忆检索表现,但损害元认知。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Feb;44(3):555-563. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0246-y. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

多巴胺能调节人类跨期选择:使用 D2 受体拮抗剂氟哌啶醇的扩散模型分析。

Dopaminergic Modulation of Human Intertemporal Choice: A Diffusion Model Analysis Using the D2-Receptor Antagonist Haloperidol.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne 50969, Germany

Department of Systems Neuroscience, University-Medical-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 7;40(41):7936-7948. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0592-20.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0592-20.2020
PMID:32948675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7548690/
Abstract

The neurotransmitter dopamine is implicated in diverse functions, including reward processing, reinforcement learning, and cognitive control. The tendency to discount future rewards over time has long been discussed in the context of potential dopaminergic modulation. Here we examined the effect of a single dose of the D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol (2 mg) on temporal discounting in healthy female and male human participants. Our approach extends previous pharmacological studies in two ways. First, we applied combined temporal discounting drift diffusion models to examine choice dynamics. Second, we examined dopaminergic modulation of reward magnitude effects on temporal discounting. Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation revealed that the data were best accounted for by a temporal discounting drift diffusion model with nonlinear trialwise drift rate scaling. This model showed good parameter recovery, and posterior predictive checks revealed that it accurately reproduced the relationship between decision conflict and response times in individual participants. We observed reduced temporal discounting and substantially faster nondecision times under haloperidol compared with placebo. Discounting was steeper for low versus high reward magnitudes, but this effect was largely unaffected by haloperidol. Results were corroborated by model-free analyses and modeling via more standard approaches. We previously reported elevated caudate activation under haloperidol in this sample of participants, supporting the idea that haloperidol elevated dopamine neurotransmission (e.g., by blocking inhibitory feedback via presynaptic D2 auto-receptors). The present results reveal that this is associated with an augmentation of both lower-level (nondecision time) and higher-level (temporal discounting) components of the decision process. Dopamine is implicated in reward processing, reinforcement learning, and cognitive control. Here we examined the effects of a single dose of the D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol on temporal discounting and choice dynamics during the decision process. We extend previous studies by applying computational modeling using the drift diffusion model, which revealed that haloperidol reduced the nondecision time and reduced impulsive choice compared with placebo. These findings are compatible with a haloperidol-induced increase in striatal dopamine (e.g., because of a presynaptic mechanism). Our data provide novel insights into the contributions of dopamine to value-based decision-making and highlight how comprehensive model-based analyses using sequential sampling models can inform the effects of pharmacological modulation on choice processes.

摘要

神经递质多巴胺与多种功能有关,包括奖励处理、强化学习和认知控制。长期以来,人们一直在讨论随着时间的推移,未来奖励的折扣倾向可能与多巴胺能调节有关。在这里,我们研究了单剂量 D2 受体拮抗剂氟哌啶醇(2 毫克)对健康女性和男性人类参与者的时间折扣的影响。我们的方法在两个方面扩展了以前的药理学研究。首先,我们应用结合时间折扣漂移扩散模型来检查选择动态。其次,我们研究了多巴胺能对奖励幅度对时间折扣的调节作用。分层贝叶斯参数估计表明,数据最好由一个具有非线性试验漂移率缩放的时间折扣漂移扩散模型来解释。该模型具有良好的参数恢复能力,后验预测检查表明,它准确地再现了个体参与者决策冲突与反应时间之间的关系。与安慰剂相比,氟哌啶醇下的时间折扣减少,非决策时间大大加快。对于低奖励和高奖励幅度,折扣更陡峭,但这种效果在很大程度上不受氟哌啶醇的影响。结果通过无模型分析和通过更标准的方法进行建模得到了证实。我们之前在这个参与者样本中报告了氟哌啶醇下尾状核的激活升高,支持氟哌啶醇升高多巴胺神经传递的想法(例如,通过阻断突触前 D2 自身受体的抑制性反馈)。本研究结果揭示,这与决策过程中较低水平(非决策时间)和较高水平(时间折扣)成分的增强有关。多巴胺与奖励处理、强化学习和认知控制有关。在这里,我们研究了单剂量 D2 受体拮抗剂氟哌啶醇对时间折扣和决策过程中选择动态的影响。我们通过应用漂移扩散模型的计算建模来扩展以前的研究,该模型揭示了氟哌啶醇与安慰剂相比降低了非决策时间并减少了冲动选择。这些发现与氟哌啶醇引起的纹状体多巴胺增加(例如,由于突触前机制)一致。我们的数据为多巴胺对基于价值的决策的贡献提供了新的见解,并强调了使用序列采样模型的综合基于模型的分析如何为药物调节对选择过程的影响提供信息。