Dexter Tyler D, Roberts Benjamin Z, Ayoub Samantha M, Noback Michael, Barnes Samuel A, Young Jared W
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.
J Neurochem. 2025 Jan;169(1):e16243. doi: 10.1111/jnc.16243. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
Functions associated with processing reward-related information are fundamental drivers of motivation, learning, and goal-directed behavior. Such functions have been classified as the positive valence system under the Research Domain and Criteria (RDoC) criteria and are negatively impacted across a range of psychiatric disorders and mental illnesses. The positive valence system is composed of three comprehensive categories containing related but dissociable functions that are organized into either Reward Responsiveness, Reward Learning, or Reward Valuation. The presence of overlapping behavioral dysfunction across diagnostic mental disorders is in-part what motivated the RDoC initiative, which emphasized that the study of mental illness focus on investigating relevant behavior and cognitive functions and their underlying mechanisms, rather than separating efforts on diagnostic categories (i.e., transdiagnostic). Moreover, the RDoC approach is well-suited for preclinical neuroscience research, as the rise in genetic toolboxes and associated neurotechnologies enables researchers to probe specific cellular targets with high specificity. Thus, there is an opportunity to dissect whether behaviors and cognitive functions are supported by shared or distinct neural mechanisms. For preclinical research to effectively inform our understandings of human behavior however, the cognitive and behavioral paradigms should have predictive, neurobiological, and pharmacological predictive validity to the human test. Touchscreen-based testing systems provide a further advantage for this endeavor enabling tasks to be presented to animals using the same media and task design as in humans. Here, we outline the primary categories of the positive valence system and review the work that has been done cross-species to investigate the neurobiology and neurochemistry underlying reward-related functioning. Additionally, we provide clinical tasks outlined by RDoC, along with validity and/or need for further validation for analogous rodent paradigms with a focus on implementing the touchscreen-based cognitive testing systems.
与处理奖励相关信息相关的功能是动机、学习和目标导向行为的基本驱动因素。根据研究领域标准(RDoC),这些功能被归类为正性效价系统,并且在一系列精神疾病和心理疾病中受到负面影响。正性效价系统由三个综合类别组成,包含相关但可分离的功能,这些功能被组织为奖励反应性、奖励学习或奖励价值评估。诊断性精神障碍中存在重叠的行为功能障碍,这在一定程度上推动了RDoC计划,该计划强调精神疾病的研究应侧重于调查相关行为和认知功能及其潜在机制,而不是将精力分散在诊断类别上(即跨诊断)。此外,RDoC方法非常适合临床前神经科学研究,因为基因工具箱和相关神经技术的兴起使研究人员能够以高特异性探测特定的细胞靶点。因此,有机会剖析行为和认知功能是由共享的还是不同的神经机制支持的。然而,为了使临床前研究有效地增进我们对人类行为的理解,认知和行为范式应该对人体测试具有预测性、神经生物学和药理学预测效度。基于触摸屏的测试系统为这一努力提供了进一步的优势,使能够使用与人类相同的媒介和任务设计向动物呈现任务。在这里,我们概述了正性效价系统的主要类别,并回顾了跨物种进行的研究工作,以调查奖励相关功能背后的神经生物学和神经化学。此外,我们提供了RDoC概述的临床任务,以及对类似啮齿动物范式的效度和/或进一步验证的需求,重点是实施基于触摸屏的认知测试系统。