• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将生态系统服务束付诸实践以进行战略可持续性规划:一种参与式方法。

Operationalizing ecosystem service bundles for strategic sustainability planning: A participatory approach.

机构信息

Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden.

Prosperous Planet, Sveavägen 131, 11346, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Ambio. 2021 Feb;50(2):314-331. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01378-w. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-020-01378-w
PMID:32948985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7782664/
Abstract

The ecosystem service concept is recognized as a useful tool to support sustainability in decision-making. In this study, we collaborated with actors in the Helge å catchment, southern Sweden, in an iterative participatory ecosystem service assessment. Through workshops and interviews, we jointly decided which ecosystem services to assess and indicators to use in order to achieve a sense of ownership and a higher legitimacy of the assessment. Subsequently, we explored the landscape-level interactions between the 15 assessed services, and found that the area can be described using three distinct ecosystem service bundles. The iterative, participatory process strengthened our analysis and created a shared understanding and overview of the multifunctional landscape around Helge å among participants. Importantly, this allowed for the generated knowledge to impact local strategic sustainability planning. With this study, we illustrate how similar processes can support local decision-making for a more sustainable future.

摘要

生态系统服务概念被认为是支持决策可持续性的有用工具。在这项研究中,我们与瑞典南部赫尔格 å 流域的利益相关者合作,进行了迭代式的参与式生态系统服务评估。通过研讨会和访谈,我们共同决定评估哪些生态系统服务以及使用哪些指标,以实现评估的所有权和更高的合法性。随后,我们探讨了评估的 15 项服务之间的景观水平相互作用,发现该区域可以用三个不同的生态系统服务束来描述。迭代式、参与式的过程加强了我们的分析,并在参与者中创造了对赫尔格 å 周边多功能景观的共同理解和概述。重要的是,这使得生成的知识能够影响当地的战略可持续性规划。通过这项研究,我们说明了类似的过程如何支持当地的决策,以实现更可持续的未来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/2b7d71488147/13280_2020_1378_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/3ed34fc85a46/13280_2020_1378_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/4fd5969bb8c3/13280_2020_1378_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/69fe0e4112cb/13280_2020_1378_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/535fe8958149/13280_2020_1378_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/2b7d71488147/13280_2020_1378_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/3ed34fc85a46/13280_2020_1378_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/4fd5969bb8c3/13280_2020_1378_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/69fe0e4112cb/13280_2020_1378_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/535fe8958149/13280_2020_1378_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d9/7782664/2b7d71488147/13280_2020_1378_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Operationalizing ecosystem service bundles for strategic sustainability planning: A participatory approach.将生态系统服务束付诸实践以进行战略可持续性规划:一种参与式方法。
Ambio. 2021 Feb;50(2):314-331. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01378-w. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
2
Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape.绘制生态系统服务束揭示了瑞典景观中不同类型的多功能性。
Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-101. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.
3
Designing mosaic landscapes for sustainable outcome: Evaluating land-use options on ecosystem service provisioning in southwestern Ghana.设计马赛克景观以实现可持续成果:评估加纳西南部生态系统服务提供的土地利用选择。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 27;353:120127. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120127. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
4
Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes.生态系统服务束分析不同景观中的权衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 16;107(11):5242-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907284107. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
5
Correction to: Operationalizing ecosystem service bundles for strategic sustainability planning: A participatory approach.对《为战略可持续性规划实施生态系统服务束:一种参与式方法》的更正
Ambio. 2021 Feb;50(2):332-334. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01406-9.
6
Quantifying stakeholder understanding of an ecosystem service trade-off.量化利益相关者对生态系统服务权衡的理解。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 2):2524-2534. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.090. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
Mapping social-ecological vulnerability to inform local decision making.绘制社会-生态脆弱性图谱,为地方决策提供信息。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Apr;32(2):447-456. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12989. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
Decision analytic strategies for integrating ecosystem services and risk assessment.决策分析策略在整合生态系统服务和风险评估中的应用。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2013 Apr;9(2):260-8. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1393.
9
Multiple ecosystem services landscape index: a tool for multifunctional landscapes conservation.多生态系统服务景观指数:一种多功能景观保护的工具。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Jan 1;147:152-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
10
Food production, ecosystem services and biodiversity: We can't have it all everywhere.食物生产、生态系统服务与生物多样性:鱼与熊掌不可兼得。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 15;573:1422-1429. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.139. Epub 2016 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration matters: Combining socio-cultural and biophysical methods for mapping ecosystem service bundles.集成很重要:结合社会文化和生物物理方法来绘制生态系统服务束图。
Ambio. 2023 Jun;52(6):1004-1021. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01830-7. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Scales and Historical Evolution: Methods to Reveal the Relationships between Ecosystem Service Bundles and Socio-Ecological Drivers-A Case Study of Dalian City, China.尺度与历史演变:揭示生态系统服务束与社会生态驱动因子关系的方法——以中国大连市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 18;19(18):11766. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811766.

本文引用的文献

1
Browning of freshwaters: Consequences to ecosystem services, underlying drivers, and potential mitigation measures.淡水的变暗:对生态系统服务的影响、潜在驱动因素和潜在缓解措施。
Ambio. 2020 Feb;49(2):375-390. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01227-5. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
Mapping regional livelihood benefits from local ecosystem services assessments in rural Sahel.绘制萨赫勒地区农村当地生态系统服务评估的区域民生效益图。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0192019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192019. eCollection 2018.
3
Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development.
为可持续发展创造可用的知识。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 26;113(17):4570-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601266113. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
4
Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles.生态系统服务束中的历史动态
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13411-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502565112. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
5
Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being.评估生态系统服务与人类福祉中的禁忌权衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 2;112(22):6949-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414900112. Epub 2015 May 18.
6
Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape.绘制生态系统服务束揭示了瑞典景观中不同类型的多功能性。
Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-101. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.
7
Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot.运用生态系统服务经济价值评估进行决策:质疑文献盲点。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Apr 15;119:208-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
8
Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences.揭示通过社会偏好的生态系统服务束。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
9
Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes.生态系统服务束分析不同景观中的权衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 16;107(11):5242-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907284107. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
10
Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.理解多种生态系统服务之间的关系。
Ecol Lett. 2009 Dec;12(12):1394-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x. Epub 2009 Oct 21.