Ritchie J A, Truelove S C
Br Med J. 1979 Feb 10;1(6160):376-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6160.376.
A double-blind controlled therapeutic trial of factorial design was used to study the therapeutic effects of lorazepam, hyoscine butylbromide, and ispaghula husk in 12 randomised blocks of eight patients with the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Each of the three agents caused a sustained symptomatic improvement in some of the patients, although only with ispaghula was the difference between the real and dummy preparation statistically significant. When the eight possible combinations of treatment were analysed none of the 12 patients who received only dummy preparations of the three agents had maintained any improvement over the three months of the trial. Seven patients improved among the 12 who received potent preparations of all three agents, and between four and six patients improved in the groups receiving one or two of the potent preparations. These therapeutic results, though far from perfect, show that the types of drug commonly used to treat IBS are of some value and may be additive in their effects. Similar combinations of other therapeutic agents may be more effective, but it will be possible to determine this only by carrying out factorial therapeutic trials.
采用析因设计的双盲对照治疗试验,对12个随机区组、每组8例的肠易激综合征(IBS)患者研究了劳拉西泮、丁溴东莨菪碱和卵叶车前子壳的治疗效果。三种药物中的每一种都使部分患者症状持续改善,不过只有卵叶车前子壳组实际用药与安慰剂之间的差异具有统计学意义。分析8种可能的治疗组合时,12例仅接受三种药物安慰剂治疗的患者在3个月的试验期间均未维持任何改善。12例接受三种药物有效制剂治疗的患者中有7例病情改善,接受一种或两种有效制剂治疗的组中有4至6例患者病情改善。这些治疗结果虽远非完美,但表明常用于治疗IBS的药物类型具有一定价值,且其效果可能具有相加性。其他治疗药物的类似组合可能更有效,但只有通过进行析因治疗试验才能确定这一点。