Suppr超能文献

BUSCOPAN 研究:一种持续丁溴东莨菪碱输注与安慰剂治疗口服非甾体抗炎药治疗无效的肾绞痛患者的随机对照非劣效性试验。

The BUSCOPAN study: a randomized-controlled non-inferiority trial of a continuous butylscopolamine infusion versus placebo in patients with a renal colic not responding to oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

机构信息

Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2747-2752. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03460-0. Epub 2020 Sep 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether placebo is non-inferior to continuous infusion of butylscopolamine in patients with renal colic.

METHODS

We conducted a placebo-controlled, multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) including 128 patients with renal colic (confirmed by ultrasound or CT-scan). Patients were randomized to receive either continuous IV butylscopolamine 100 mg/24 h or placebo (saline). Primary outcome is the amount of opioid escape medication used, measured in doses administered. Secondary outcomes are pain measured on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), side effects, and time of drug administration. Non-inferiority was assessed using linear regression with robust standard errors, with non-inferiority limit set at 0.5 units of escape medication.

RESULTS

Median number of doses of escape medication was one in both groups. The number of extra doses in the placebo group compared with the butylscopolamine group was 0.05, with a 95% robust confidence interval (CI) of 0.38-0.47. Upper limit of the CI remained below the non-inferiority limit of 0.5 (p = 0.04). No differences in secondary endpoints were seen between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Placebo is non-inferior to continuous IV butylscopolamine for pain relief in patients with renal colic. Based on this study and previous evidence, there is no role for continuous butylscopolamine IV in the treatment of renal colic. Trial NL7819.

摘要

目的

研究在肾绞痛患者中,安慰剂是否不如丁溴东莨菪碱持续输注。

方法

我们进行了一项安慰剂对照、多中心、双盲随机临床试验(RCT),纳入了 128 例肾绞痛患者(通过超声或 CT 扫描证实)。患者被随机分配接受持续静脉注射丁溴东莨菪碱 100mg/24h 或安慰剂(生理盐水)。主要结局是使用的阿片类药物解救药物的剂量,以给药剂量衡量。次要结局是疼痛的数字评分量表(NRS)评分、副作用和药物给药时间。使用稳健标准误差的线性回归评估非劣效性,非劣效性界限设定为 0.5 单位的解救药物。

结果

两组的中位解救药物剂量均为 1 剂。安慰剂组与丁溴东莨菪碱组相比,额外剂量为 0.05,95%稳健置信区间(CI)为 0.38-0.47。CI 的上限仍低于非劣效性界限 0.5(p=0.04)。两组在次要结局方面无差异。

结论

在缓解肾绞痛患者的疼痛方面,安慰剂与丁溴东莨菪碱持续静脉输注相比无差异。基于这项研究和以往的证据,丁溴东莨菪碱持续静脉输注在肾绞痛的治疗中没有作用。试验注册号 NL7819。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b89a/8332573/e55089aaeb50/345_2020_3460_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验