Rosentritt Martin, Preis Verena, Behr Michael, Strasser Thomas
PhD, Engineer, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
PhD, DDS, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Oct;110:103970. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103970. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
Comparison of in-vitro fatigue and wear performance of 3Y-, 4Y-, 5Y-TZP and lithiumdisilicate ceramic, multilayer/monolayer 4Y-TZP and variation of wall thickness at 5Y-TZP.
Crowns (n = 96; 6 groups à 16) were made of 3Y-TZP-LA, 4Y-TZP (multilayer and monolayer), 5Y-TZP (0,5mm/1 mm wall thickness) and lithiumdisilicate. 8 per group were stored in water (24hrs), 8 underwent TCML (1.200.000 × 50N; 2x3000x5°/55 °C; HO, 2min cycle). Fracture force was determined by static loading (v = 1 mm/min, steel sphere with tin foil, diameter = 12 mm). Pin-on-block wear test was performed (steatite antagonist d = 3 mm; 50N, 120,000 cycles, 1.2Hz, lateral motion: 1 mm, antagonist lift: 1 mm, n = 8). Roughness, wear depth [μm] and antagonist wear were determined (3-D-laser-microscope, KJ3D, Keyence, J).
one-way-ANOVA; Bonferroni-post-hoc-test; α = 0.05.
Fracture forces varied between 1211N (5Y,TCML) and 3952N (4Y-Mult,TCML). Individual significant differences (p ≤ 0.025) were found between materials. Increase of wall thickness (5Y; 0.5 mm/1.0 mm) lead to a non-significant (p ≥ 0.442) increase of fracture force. 4Y and 4Y-multilayer zirconia showed no significantly different (p ≥ 0.073) fracture forces. Zirconia mean wear (3Y:10.0 ± 3.9 μm, 4Y:19.8 ± 3.8 μm, 5Y:10.9 ± 6.8 μm) was not significantly (p = 1.000) different. Lithiumdisilicate ceramic (149.3 ± 45.4 μm) and human enamel (434.2 ± 131.3 μm) provided significantly (p ≤ 0.002) higher wear. Antagonistic wear against lithiumdisilicate (17.5 ± 3.9%) and human enamel (6.7 ± 3.0%) was significantly (p ≤ 0.007) lower than against zirconia (4Y:31.9 ± 8.0% - 5Y:27.6 ± 5.8%).
Fracture force of 5Y-TZP differs from 4- or 3-Y-TZP. Mechanical characteristics and dimensional requirement of 5Y-TZP are comparable to lithiumdisilicate. Mono- or multilayer 4Y-TZP provided comparable fracture forces. Wear was comparable between zirconia systems and lower in comparison to lithiumdisilicate or enamel.
比较3Y-TZP、4Y-TZP、5Y-TZP和二硅酸锂陶瓷的体外疲劳和磨损性能,多层/单层4Y-TZP以及5Y-TZP壁厚的变化。
制作96个全冠(6组,每组16个),材料分别为3Y-TZP-LA、4Y-TZP(多层和单层)、5Y-TZP(壁厚0.5mm/1mm)和二硅酸锂。每组8个全冠储存在水中(24小时),8个进行TCML试验(1200000次×50N;2×3000次×5°/55°C;水,2分钟循环)。通过静态加载(速度=1mm/分钟,带锡箔的钢球,直径=12mm)测定断裂力。进行销盘磨损试验(滑石拮抗剂直径=3mm;50N,120000次循环,1.2Hz,横向运动:1mm,拮抗剂提升:1mm,n=8)。测定粗糙度、磨损深度[μm]和拮抗剂磨损(三维激光显微镜,KJ3D,基恩士,日本)。
单因素方差分析;Bonferroni事后检验;α=0.05。
断裂力在1211N(5Y,TCML)和3952N(4Y-多层,TCML)之间变化。材料之间存在个体显著差异(p≤0.025)。壁厚增加(5Y;0.5mm/1.0mm)导致断裂力无显著增加(p≥0.442)。4Y和4Y-多层氧化锆的断裂力无显著差异(p≥0.073)。氧化锆的平均磨损(3Y:10.0±3.9μm,4Y:19.8±3.8μm,5Y:10.9±6.8μm)无显著差异(p=1.000)。二硅酸锂陶瓷(1