Suppr超能文献

原发性进行性多发性硬化症试验中的脊髓萎缩:使用 GBSI 提高样本量。

Spinal cord atrophy in a primary progressive multiple sclerosis trial: Improved sample size using GBSI.

机构信息

Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Centre, Department of Neurosciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.

Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102418. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102418. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the implications for clinical trial design of the generalised boundary-shift integral (GBSI) for spinal cord atrophy measurement.

METHODS

We included 220 primary-progressive multiple sclerosis patients from a phase 2 clinical trial, with baseline and week-48 3DT1-weighted MRI of the brain and spinal cord (1 × 1 × 1 mm), acquired separately. We obtained segmentation-based cross-sectional spinal cord area (CSA) at C1-2 (from both brain and spinal cord MRI) and C2-5 levels (from spinal cord MRI) using DeepSeg, and, then, we computed corresponding GBSI.

RESULTS

Depending on the spinal cord segment, we included 67.4-98.1% patients for CSA measurements, and 66.9-84.2% for GBSI. Spinal cord atrophy measurements obtained with GBSI had lower measurement variability, than corresponding CSA. Looking at the image noise floor, the lowest median standard deviation of the MRI signal within the cerebrospinal fluid surrounding the spinal cord was found on brain MRI at the C1-2 level. Spinal cord atrophy derived from brain MRI was related to the corresponding measures from dedicated spinal cord MRI, more strongly for GBSI than CSA. Spinal cord atrophy measurements using GBSI, but not CSA, were associated with upper and lower limb motor progression.

DISCUSSION

Notwithstanding the reduced measurement variability, the clinical correlates, and the possibility of using brain acquisitions, spinal cord atrophy using GBSI should remain a secondary outcome measure in MS studies, until further advancements increase the quality of acquisition and reliability of processing.

摘要

背景

我们旨在评估广义边界位移积分(GBSI)用于脊髓萎缩测量对临床试验设计的影响。

方法

我们纳入了 220 名来自 2 期临床试验的原发性进展型多发性硬化症患者,基线和第 48 周时进行了脑部和脊髓的 3DT1 加权 MRI(1×1×1mm),分别采集。我们使用 DeepSeg 获得了基于分割的 C1-2 节段(来自脑和脊髓 MRI)和 C2-5 节段(来自脊髓 MRI)的脊髓面积(CSA),并计算了相应的 GBSI。

结果

根据脊髓节段的不同,我们纳入了 67.4%-98.1%的患者进行 CSA 测量,66.9%-84.2%的患者进行 GBSI 测量。与相应的 CSA 相比,GBSI 测量的脊髓萎缩具有更低的测量变异性。从图像噪声下限来看,在 C1-2 水平,脑 MRI 中脊髓周围脑脊液内的 MRI 信号最低中位标准差。来自脑 MRI 的脊髓萎缩与来自专用脊髓 MRI 的相应测量值相关,GBSI 比 CSA 更强。使用 GBSI 进行的脊髓萎缩测量与上下肢运动进展有关,而 CSA 则没有。

讨论

尽管测量变异性降低,与临床相关,并且有可能使用脑部采集,但 GBSI 用于脊髓萎缩的测量仍应作为 MS 研究中的次要结局指标,直到进一步改进提高采集质量和处理可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a89/7509079/f4424fb96678/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验