Pôle de Femme, de la Mère et de l'Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Brest, France.
Laboratoire Interactions Epithéliums Neurones, EA 4685, Faculté de médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, 29200, France.
Pediatr Res. 2021 May;89(7):1840-1847. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-01152-4. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
Accurate assessments of pain in hospitalized preterm infants present a major challenge in improving the short- and long-term consequences associated with painful experiences. We evaluated the ability of the newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation (NIPE) index to detect acute procedural pain in preterm infants.
Different painful and stressful interventions were prospectively observed in preterm infants born at 25 + 0 to 35 + 6 weeks gestation. Pain responses were measured using the composite Premature Infant Pain Profile Revised (PIPP-R) scale, the NIPE index, and skin conductance responses (SCR). Outcome measures were correlations between the NIPE index, the PIPP-R score, and the SCR. Sensitivity/specificity analyses tested the accuracy of the NIPE index and SCR.
Two hundred and fifty-four procedures were recorded in 90 preterm infants. No significant correlation was found between PIPP-R and the NIPE index. PIPP-R and SCR were positively correlated (r = 0.27, P < 0.001), with stronger correlations for painful procedures (r = 0.68, P < 0.001) and especially for skin-breaking procedures (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). The NIPE index and SCR had high sensitivity and high negative predictive values to predict PIPP-R > 10, especially for skin-breaking painful procedures.
We found no significant correlation between the NIPE index and PIPP-R during routine painful or stressful procedures in preterm infants.
Exposure to repetitive pain can lead to neurodevelopmental sequelae. Behavior-based pain scales have limited clinical utility, especially for preterm infants. New devices for monitoring physiological responses to pain have not been validated sufficiently in preterm infants. This study found that the NIPE index was not significantly correlated to the validated PIPP-R scale during acute procedural pain. Secondary analysis of this study showed that NIPE index and SCRs may help to exclude severe pain in preterm infants. In clinical practice, measurements of physiological parameters should be combined with behavior-based scales for multidimensional pain assessments.
准确评估住院早产儿的疼痛是改善与疼痛经历相关的短期和长期后果的主要挑战。我们评估了新生儿副交感神经评估(NIPE)指数检测早产儿急性程序性疼痛的能力。
前瞻性观察了 25+0 至 35+6 周龄早产儿的不同疼痛和应激性干预。使用复合早产儿疼痛概况修订版(PIPP-R)量表、NIPE 指数和皮肤电导反应(SCR)测量疼痛反应。测量指标为 NIPE 指数、PIPP-R 评分和 SCR 之间的相关性。灵敏度/特异性分析测试了 NIPE 指数和 SCR 的准确性。
在 90 名早产儿中记录了 254 次操作。PIPP-R 与 NIPE 指数之间没有显著相关性。PIPP-R 和 SCR 呈正相关(r=0.27,P<0.001),对于疼痛操作(r=0.68,P<0.001)和特别是皮肤破损操作(r=0.82,P<0.001)相关性更强。NIPE 指数和 SCR 对预测 PIPP-R>10 具有高灵敏度和高阴性预测值,尤其是对皮肤破损疼痛操作。
我们发现,在早产儿常规疼痛或应激性操作过程中,NIPE 指数与 PIPP-R 之间没有显著相关性。
反复暴露于疼痛会导致神经发育后遗症。基于行为的疼痛量表在临床上的应用有限,尤其是在早产儿中。用于监测疼痛生理反应的新设备在早产儿中尚未得到充分验证。本研究发现,在急性程序性疼痛期间,NIPE 指数与经过验证的 PIPP-R 量表没有显著相关性。本研究的二次分析表明,NIPE 指数和 SCR 可能有助于排除早产儿的严重疼痛。在临床实践中,生理参数的测量应与基于行为的量表相结合,进行多维疼痛评估。