• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑车辆运动状态和乘客生理特征的车辆乘客舒适性研究:提高自动驾驶车辆的乘客舒适性。

Research on the Comfort of Vehicle Passengers Considering the Vehicle Motion State and Passenger Physiological Characteristics: Improving the Passenger Comfort of Autonomous Vehicles.

机构信息

School of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6821. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186821.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17186821
PMID:32962050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7559987/
Abstract

Comfort is a significant factor that affects passengers' choice of autonomous vehicles. The comfort of an autonomous vehicle is largely determined by its control algorithm. Therefore, if the comfort of passengers can be predicted based on factors that affect comfort and the control algorithm can be adjusted, it can be beneficial to improve the comfort of autonomous vehicles. In view of this, in the present study, a human-driven experiment was carried out to simulate the typical driving state of a future autonomous vehicle. In the experiment, vehicle motion parameters and the comfort evaluation results of passengers with different physiological characteristics were collected. A single-factor analysis method and binary logistic regression analysis model were used to determine the factors that affect the evaluation results of passenger comfort. A passenger comfort prediction model was established based on the bidirectional long short-term memory network model. The results demonstrate that the accuracy of the passenger comfort prediction model reached 84%, which can provide a theoretical basis for the adjustment of the control algorithm and path trajectory of autonomous vehicles.

摘要

舒适性是影响乘客选择自动驾驶汽车的重要因素。自动驾驶汽车的舒适性在很大程度上取决于其控制算法。因此,如果能够根据影响舒适性的因素预测乘客的舒适性,并调整控制算法,将有助于提高自动驾驶汽车的舒适性。有鉴于此,本研究开展了一项人为驾驶实验,以模拟未来自动驾驶汽车的典型驾驶状态。在实验中,收集了车辆运动参数和不同生理特征乘客的舒适性评价结果。采用单因素分析方法和二项逻辑回归分析模型,确定了影响乘客舒适性评价结果的因素。并基于双向长短期记忆网络模型建立了乘客舒适性预测模型。结果表明,该乘客舒适性预测模型的准确率达到 84%,可为自动驾驶汽车的控制算法和路径轨迹调整提供理论依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/ec4ae4496665/ijerph-17-06821-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/534e2156780d/ijerph-17-06821-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/8ff163043728/ijerph-17-06821-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/e2e3a7f0bed4/ijerph-17-06821-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/00dc78a73134/ijerph-17-06821-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/93d9dff0be7b/ijerph-17-06821-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/7a40b3a96ed6/ijerph-17-06821-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/caec229fd132/ijerph-17-06821-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/50596462fe19/ijerph-17-06821-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/6ed52b000ec8/ijerph-17-06821-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/6b8de6f64f38/ijerph-17-06821-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/ec4ae4496665/ijerph-17-06821-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/534e2156780d/ijerph-17-06821-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/8ff163043728/ijerph-17-06821-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/e2e3a7f0bed4/ijerph-17-06821-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/00dc78a73134/ijerph-17-06821-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/93d9dff0be7b/ijerph-17-06821-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/7a40b3a96ed6/ijerph-17-06821-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/caec229fd132/ijerph-17-06821-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/50596462fe19/ijerph-17-06821-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/6ed52b000ec8/ijerph-17-06821-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/6b8de6f64f38/ijerph-17-06821-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a6/7559987/ec4ae4496665/ijerph-17-06821-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on the Comfort of Vehicle Passengers Considering the Vehicle Motion State and Passenger Physiological Characteristics: Improving the Passenger Comfort of Autonomous Vehicles.考虑车辆运动状态和乘客生理特征的车辆乘客舒适性研究:提高自动驾驶车辆的乘客舒适性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6821. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186821.
2
Motion sickness in passenger vehicles during test track operations.车辆在测试轨道运行时的晕车。
Ergonomics. 2019 Oct;62(10):1357-1371. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1632938. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
3
Exploring Factors Influencing Injury Severity of Vehicle At-fault Accidents: A Comparative Analysis of Passenger and Freight Vehicles.探究影响车辆有责事故伤害严重程度的因素:乘用车和商用车的比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041146.
4
The Braking-Pressure and Driving-Direction Determination System (BDDS) Using Road Roughness and Passenger Conditions of Surrounding Vehicles.基于道路粗糙度和周围车辆乘客状态的制动压力和行驶方向确定系统(BDDS)。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 10;22(12):4414. doi: 10.3390/s22124414.
5
Analysis of bus passenger comfort perception based on passenger load factor and in-vehicle time.基于乘客载客率和车内时间的公交乘客舒适度感知分析
Springerplus. 2016 Jan 22;5:62. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1694-7. eCollection 2016.
6
Looking forward: In-vehicle auxiliary display positioning affects carsickness.展望未来:车内辅助显示器的位置会影响晕车。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Apr;68:169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
7
Young females at risk while driving with a small child.年轻女性在搭载小孩驾车时面临风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:321-331. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
8
Driver seat comfort for level 3-4 autonomous vehicles.三级和四级自动驾驶车辆的驾驶座舒适度。
Work. 2021;68(s1):S111-S118. doi: 10.3233/WOR-208010.
9
Risk of injury to child passengers in sport utility vehicles.运动型多用途汽车中儿童乘客的受伤风险。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):9-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1364.
10
Standards for passenger comfort in automated vehicles: Acceleration and jerk.自动驾驶车辆乘客舒适性标准:加速度和加加速度。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Jan;106:103881. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103881. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Intelligent Vehicle Control with a Prediction Model of Passenger Comfort Based on Postural Instability Parameters.基于姿势不稳定参数的乘客舒适度预测模型改善智能车辆控制
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Sep 5;25(17):5529. doi: 10.3390/s25175529.
2
Investigating the impact of different road scenarios on the induction intensity of motion sickness in electric vehicle passengers.研究不同道路场景对电动汽车乘客晕动病诱发强度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 1;16:1615498. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1615498. eCollection 2025.
3
A biomechanical model of a vehicle passenger in the sagittal plane.

本文引用的文献

1
Motion sickness in automated vehicles with forward and rearward facing seating orientations.具有前后向座椅布置的自动驾驶车辆中的运动病。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jul;78:54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
2
Sex Differences in the Incidence of Motion Sickness Induced by Linear Visual Oscillation.线性视觉振荡诱发晕动病发生率的性别差异
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 Sep;86(9):787-93. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4243.2015.
3
Aircraft passenger comfort experience: underlying factors and differentiation from discomfort.
矢状面内车辆乘客的生物力学模型。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 16;10(4):e26375. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26375. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
4
A Review on Human Comfort Factors, Measurements, and Improvements in Human-Robot Collaboration.关于人机协作中人的舒适因素、测量和改进的综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 30;22(19):7431. doi: 10.3390/s22197431.
5
A comprehensive evaluation model for the intelligent automobile cockpit comfort.智能汽车座舱舒适性的综合评价模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 2;12(1):15014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19261-x.
飞机乘客的舒适体验:潜在因素及与不适的区别。
Appl Ergon. 2016 Jan;52:301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Motion sickness susceptibility.晕动病易感性
Auton Neurosci. 2006 Oct 30;129(1-2):67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2006.07.019. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
5
Characteristic changes in the physiological components of cybersickness.晕动病生理成分的特征性变化。
Psychophysiology. 2005 Sep;42(5):616-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00349.x.
6
Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional LSTM and other neural network architectures.使用双向长短期记忆网络和其他神经网络架构进行逐帧音素分类。
Neural Netw. 2005 Jun-Jul;18(5-6):602-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.06.042.
7
Differences in autonomic responses between subjects with and without nausea while watching an irregularly oscillating video.观看不规则振荡视频时,有恶心症状和无恶心症状的受试者之间自主神经反应的差异。
Auton Neurosci. 2004 Nov 30;116(1-2):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2004.08.008.
8
Psychophysiological evaluation of simulator sickness evoked by a graphic simulator.图形模拟器诱发的模拟器晕动病的心理生理评估
Appl Ergon. 2004 Nov;35(6):549-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.002.
9
Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures.坐姿的舒适与不适及其与客观测量指标的关系。
Ergonomics. 2003 Aug 15;46(10):985-97. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000121977.
10
Long short-term memory.长短期记忆
Neural Comput. 1997 Nov 15;9(8):1735-80. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.