• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于姿势不稳定参数的乘客舒适度预测模型改善智能车辆控制

Improving Intelligent Vehicle Control with a Prediction Model of Passenger Comfort Based on Postural Instability Parameters.

作者信息

Xu Bin, Zhou Hang, Zhou Yuanlong, Wang Yunhao, Li Zhen

机构信息

School of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2025 Sep 5;25(17):5529. doi: 10.3390/s25175529.

DOI:10.3390/s25175529
PMID:40942958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12431336/
Abstract

With the development of technology, comfort has gradually developed into the main criterion for evaluating intelligent vehicle performances. In this study, a field test was carried out under five common driving conditions, and 60 participants took part. Passenger posture data, vehicle motion data and passenger subjective comfort data were collected. A paired sample T-test and a ridge regression algorithm were used to explore the relationship between passenger posture swing parameters and subjective comfort. The results show that under the same driving conditions, the speed of posture swing was significantly higher for passengers who experienced discomfort. Furthermore, we found that the change in angular velocity was the main cause of passenger discomfort under different driving conditions. This suggested that the design of intelligent vehicle algorithms should focus on the angular velocity variation among passengers. Finally, based on traditional machine learning algorithms and deep learning algorithms, this paper establishes two models for predicting comfort through passenger posture instability. The accuracy of the machine learning model in predicting passenger comfort was 87.1%, while that for the deep learning model was 89%. The findings are useful in providing a theoretical basis for improving the comfort of intelligent vehicles.

摘要

随着技术的发展,舒适性已逐渐发展成为评估智能汽车性能的主要标准。在本研究中,在五种常见驾驶条件下进行了现场测试,60名参与者参与其中。收集了乘客姿势数据、车辆运动数据和乘客主观舒适度数据。使用配对样本T检验和岭回归算法来探索乘客姿势摆动参数与主观舒适度之间的关系。结果表明,在相同驾驶条件下,感到不适的乘客姿势摆动速度明显更高。此外,我们发现角速度的变化是不同驾驶条件下乘客不适的主要原因。这表明智能车辆算法的设计应关注乘客之间的角速度变化。最后,基于传统机器学习算法和深度学习算法,本文建立了两个通过乘客姿势不稳定性预测舒适度的模型。机器学习模型预测乘客舒适度的准确率为87.1%,而深度学习模型的准确率为89%。这些发现有助于为提高智能车辆的舒适性提供理论依据。

相似文献

1
Improving Intelligent Vehicle Control with a Prediction Model of Passenger Comfort Based on Postural Instability Parameters.基于姿势不稳定参数的乘客舒适度预测模型改善智能车辆控制
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Sep 5;25(17):5529. doi: 10.3390/s25175529.
2
Child face detection on front passenger seat through deep learning.基于深度学习的汽车前排儿童座椅检测
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(6):842-851. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2346811. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Development of Machine Learning-based Algorithms to Predict the 2- and 5-year Risk of TKA After Tibial Plateau Fracture Treatment.基于机器学习的算法用于预测胫骨平台骨折治疗后2年和5年全膝关节置换风险的研究进展
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003442.
4
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Frontal NCAP performance and field injury over 40 years.40 多年来正面 NCAP 性能和现场损伤。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(3):297-312. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2315890. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
8
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
9
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Balancing safety and efficiency for autonomous vehicles at urban uncontrolled crosswalk: challenges and countermeasures.
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Sep;220:108111. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.108111. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
2
Predicting driving comfort in autonomous vehicles using road information and multi-head attention models.利用道路信息和多头注意力模型预测自动驾驶车辆的驾驶舒适性。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 19;16(1):2709. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57845-z.
3
Can We Estimate Motion Sickness Severity in Car Passengers Based on Individual Head Dynamics?
Hum Factors. 2025 Oct;67(10):1101-1114. doi: 10.1177/00187208251326683. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Visually induced motion sickness correlates with on-road car sickness while performing a visual task.在执行视觉任务时,视觉诱发的晕动病与实际乘车时的晕车相关。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Mar 3;243(4):81. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07020-z.
5
On the road to comfort: Evaluating the influence of motion predictability on motion sickness in automated vehicles.通往舒适之路:评估运动可预测性对自动驾驶车辆晕动病的影响。
Ergonomics. 2025 May;68(5):697-715. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2372704. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Assessing Passengers' Motion Sickness Levels Based on Cerebral Blood Oxygen Signals and Simulation of Actual Ride Sensation.基于脑血氧信号评估乘客晕动病水平及实际乘车感觉模拟
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 12;13(8):1403. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13081403.
7
Validating models of sensory conflict and perception for motion sickness prediction.验证用于晕车预测的感觉冲突和感知模型。
Biol Cybern. 2023 Jun;117(3):185-209. doi: 10.1007/s00422-023-00959-8. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
8
Standards for passenger comfort in automated vehicles: Acceleration and jerk.自动驾驶车辆乘客舒适性标准:加速度和加加速度。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Jan;106:103881. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103881. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
9
Amplitude and Temporal Dynamics of Motion Sickness.晕动病的幅度与时间动态变化
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 May 9;16:866503. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.866503. eCollection 2022.
10
How feelings of unpleasantness develop during the progression of motion sickness symptoms.在晕动病症状进展过程中,不愉快的感觉是如何产生的。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Dec;239(12):3615-3624. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06226-1. Epub 2021 Sep 30.