Suppr超能文献

预防性金属夹夹闭对6至20毫米息肉息肉切除术后延迟出血的影响及危险因素:一项倾向评分匹配分析

The effect of prophylactic hemoclip placement and risk factors of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding in polyps sized 6 to 20 millimeters: a propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Chen Chun-Wei, Kuo Chia-Jung, Chiu Cheng-Tang, Su Ming-Yao, Lin Chun-Jung, Le Puo-Hsien, Lim Siew-Na, Yeh Chau-Ting, Alison Malcolm R, Lin Wey-Ran

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No 5, Fu Hsing Street, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01454-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) is a major complication of polypectomy. The effect of prophylactic hemoclipping on delayed PPB is uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic hemoclipping and identify the risk factors of delayed PPB.

METHODS

Patients with polyps sized 6 to 20 mm underwent snare polypectomy from 2015 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients with prophylactic hemoclipping for delayed PPB prevention were included in the clipping group, and those without prophylactic hemoclipping were included in the non-clipping group. The incidence of delayed PPB and time to bleeding were compared between the groups. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors of delayed PPB. Propensity score matching was used to minimize potential bias.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 612 patients with 806 polyps were in the clipping group, and 576 patients with 806 polyps were in the non-clipping group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of delayed PPB and days to bleeding between two groups (0.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.4; 3.4 ± 1.94 days vs 4.13 ± 3.39 days, p = 0.94). In the multivariate analysis, the polyp size [Odds ratio (OR):1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.01-1.16, p = 0.03), multiple polypectomies (OR: 4.64, 95% CI:1.24-17.44, p = 0.02) and a history of anticoagulant use (OR:37.52, 95% CI:6.49-216.8, p < 0.001) were associated with delayed PPB.

CONCLUSIONS

In polyps sized 6 to 20 mm, prophylactic hemoclip placement did not decrease the risk of delayed PPB. Patients without risk factors including multiple polypectomies and anticoagulant use are no need to performing prophylactic hemoclipping.

摘要

背景

息肉切除术后延迟出血(PPB)是息肉切除术的主要并发症。预防性金属夹夹闭对延迟性PPB的影响尚不确定。本研究的目的是评估预防性金属夹夹闭的有效性,并确定延迟性PPB的危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2015年至2017年接受圈套器息肉切除术的息肉大小为6至20毫米的患者。将接受预防性金属夹夹闭以预防延迟性PPB的患者纳入夹闭组,未接受预防性金属夹夹闭的患者纳入非夹闭组。比较两组延迟性PPB的发生率和出血时间。采用多因素分析确定延迟性PPB的危险因素。使用倾向评分匹配以尽量减少潜在偏倚。

结果

倾向评分匹配后,夹闭组有612例患者806枚息肉,非夹闭组有576例患者806枚息肉。两组延迟性PPB的发生率和出血天数无显著差异(0.8%对1.3%,p = 0.4;3.4±1.94天对4.13±3.39天,p = 0.94)。多因素分析显示,息肉大小[比值比(OR):1.16,95%置信区间(CI):1.01 - 1.16,p = 0.03]、多次息肉切除术(OR:4.64,95% CI:1.24 - 17.44,p = 0.02)和抗凝药物使用史(OR:37.52,95% CI:6.49 - 216.8,p < 0.001)与延迟性PPB相关。

结论

对于大小为6至20毫米的息肉,预防性放置金属夹并不能降低延迟性PPB的风险。无多次息肉切除术和抗凝药物使用等危险因素的患者无需进行预防性金属夹夹闭。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6184/7510104/6937532508e8/12876_2020_1454_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验