Chen Chun-Wei, Kuo Chia-Jung, Chiu Cheng-Tang, Su Ming-Yao, Lin Chun-Jung, Le Puo-Hsien, Lim Siew-Na, Yeh Chau-Ting, Alison Malcolm R, Lin Wey-Ran
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No 5, Fu Hsing Street, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan.
College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01454-1.
Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) is a major complication of polypectomy. The effect of prophylactic hemoclipping on delayed PPB is uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic hemoclipping and identify the risk factors of delayed PPB.
Patients with polyps sized 6 to 20 mm underwent snare polypectomy from 2015 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients with prophylactic hemoclipping for delayed PPB prevention were included in the clipping group, and those without prophylactic hemoclipping were included in the non-clipping group. The incidence of delayed PPB and time to bleeding were compared between the groups. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors of delayed PPB. Propensity score matching was used to minimize potential bias.
After propensity score matching, 612 patients with 806 polyps were in the clipping group, and 576 patients with 806 polyps were in the non-clipping group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of delayed PPB and days to bleeding between two groups (0.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.4; 3.4 ± 1.94 days vs 4.13 ± 3.39 days, p = 0.94). In the multivariate analysis, the polyp size [Odds ratio (OR):1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.01-1.16, p = 0.03), multiple polypectomies (OR: 4.64, 95% CI:1.24-17.44, p = 0.02) and a history of anticoagulant use (OR:37.52, 95% CI:6.49-216.8, p < 0.001) were associated with delayed PPB.
In polyps sized 6 to 20 mm, prophylactic hemoclip placement did not decrease the risk of delayed PPB. Patients without risk factors including multiple polypectomies and anticoagulant use are no need to performing prophylactic hemoclipping.
息肉切除术后延迟出血(PPB)是息肉切除术的主要并发症。预防性金属夹夹闭对延迟性PPB的影响尚不确定。本研究的目的是评估预防性金属夹夹闭的有效性,并确定延迟性PPB的危险因素。
回顾性分析2015年至2017年接受圈套器息肉切除术的息肉大小为6至20毫米的患者。将接受预防性金属夹夹闭以预防延迟性PPB的患者纳入夹闭组,未接受预防性金属夹夹闭的患者纳入非夹闭组。比较两组延迟性PPB的发生率和出血时间。采用多因素分析确定延迟性PPB的危险因素。使用倾向评分匹配以尽量减少潜在偏倚。
倾向评分匹配后,夹闭组有612例患者806枚息肉,非夹闭组有576例患者806枚息肉。两组延迟性PPB的发生率和出血天数无显著差异(0.8%对1.3%,p = 0.4;3.4±1.94天对4.13±3.39天,p = 0.94)。多因素分析显示,息肉大小[比值比(OR):1.16,95%置信区间(CI):1.01 - 1.16,p = 0.03]、多次息肉切除术(OR:4.64,95% CI:1.24 - 17.44,p = 0.02)和抗凝药物使用史(OR:37.52,95% CI:6.49 - 216.8,p < 0.001)与延迟性PPB相关。
对于大小为6至20毫米的息肉,预防性放置金属夹并不能降低延迟性PPB的风险。无多次息肉切除术和抗凝药物使用等危险因素的患者无需进行预防性金属夹夹闭。