Suppr超能文献

记录封锁期间手术前的新冠病毒病筛查情况(新冠病毒筛查):一项利用常规收集的健康数据进行的审计。

Documenting COVID-19 screening before surgery during lockdown (COVID Screen): an audit with routinely collected health data.

作者信息

Story David, Coyle Elizabeth, Devapalasundaram Abarna, Sidiropoulos Sofia, Ou Yang Bobby, Coulson Tim

机构信息

Centre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, 151 Barry Street, Carlton, Vic. 3010, Australia. Email:

St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Vic. 3065, Australia. Email:

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2020 Sep;44(5):723-727. doi: 10.1071/AH20169.

Abstract

Objective This study analysed screening for COVID-19 before surgery and outcomes of any perioperative testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection during pandemic-restricted surgery. Methods An audit was conducted with routinely collected health data before both elective and non-elective surgery at two large Melbourne hospitals during April and early May 2020. We looked for documented systematic screening for COVID-19 disease and fever (>38°C) and results of SARS-COV-2 testing, and proposed a minimum acceptable documenting rate of 85%. Results The study included 2197 consecutive patients (1279 (58%) undergoing elective surgery, 917 (42%) undergoing non-elective surgery) across most specialities. Although 926 (72%) patients undergoing elective surgery had both systematic screening and temperature documented, approximately half that percentage undergoing non-elective surgery (n=347; 38%) had both documented. However, 871 (95%) of non-elective surgery patients had temperature documented. Acknowledging limited screening, 85 (9.3%) non-elective surgery patients had positive screening, compared with 39 (3.0%) elective surgery patients. All 152 (7%) patients who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 were negative, and no cases were reported from external contact tracing. Conclusions Although 'not documented' does not necessarily equal 'not done', we found that documenting of COVID-19 screening could be improved. Better understanding of implementing screening practices in pandemics and other crises, particularly for non-elective surgery patients, is warranted. What is known about the topic? Little is known about routine screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection among surgical patients. However, it is well established that implementing effective uptake of safety and quality initiatives can be difficult. What does this paper add? We found that although most patients had documented temperature, fewer than 75% had a documented systematic questionnaire screen for COVID, particularly patients undergoing non-elective surgery. What are the implications for practitioners? Clear documenting is important in managing patients. Pandemics and other crises can require rapid changes in practice. Implementing such measures may be less complete than anticipated and may require greater use of evidence-based implementation strategies, particularly in the less predictable care of non-elective surgery patients.

摘要

目的 本研究分析了手术前对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的筛查以及在大流行限制手术期间对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染进行的任何围手术期检测的结果。方法 于2020年4月至5月初,对墨尔本两家大型医院择期和非择期手术前常规收集的健康数据进行了审计。我们查找了关于COVID-19疾病和发热(>38°C)的系统性筛查记录以及SARS-CoV-2检测结果,并提出最低可接受记录率为85%。结果 该研究纳入了2197例连续患者(1279例(58%)接受择期手术,917例(42%)接受非择期手术),涉及大多数专科。虽然1279例接受择期手术的患者中有926例(72%)有系统性筛查和体温记录,但接受非择期手术的患者中这一比例约为一半(n = 347;38%)。然而,917例非择期手术患者中有871例(95%)有体温记录。考虑到筛查有限,85例(9.3%)非择期手术患者筛查呈阳性,而择期手术患者中有39例(3.0%)呈阳性。所有152例(7%)接受SARS-CoV-2检测的患者均为阴性,且外部接触者追踪未报告任何病例。结论 虽然“未记录”不一定等于“未进行”,但我们发现COVID-19筛查的记录情况仍可改善。有必要更好地了解在大流行及其他危机中实施筛查措施的情况,尤其是针对非择期手术患者。关于该主题已知哪些信息?关于手术患者中SARS-CoV-2感染的常规筛查知之甚少。然而,已明确的是,有效实施安全和质量举措可能存在困难。本文补充了哪些内容?我们发现,虽然大多数患者有体温记录,但不到75%的患者有关于COVID的系统性问卷筛查记录,尤其是接受非择期手术的患者。对从业者有何启示?清晰的记录对于患者管理很重要。大流行和其他危机可能需要在实践中迅速做出改变。实施此类措施可能不如预期那样完整,可能需要更多地使用基于证据的实施策略,尤其是在较难预测的非择期手术患者护理中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验