Suppr超能文献

验证当前手术过程术语代码,以稳定肋骨骨折。

Validation of current procedural terminology codes for surgical stabilization of rib fractures.

机构信息

Denver Health & Hospital Authority, 777 Bannock st. MC 0206 Denver CO 80204 USA.

Denver Health & Hospital Authority, 777 Bannock st. MC 0206 Denver CO 80204 USA.

出版信息

Injury. 2020 Nov;51(11):2500-2506. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) are based solely on the number of ribs fixed, tricotomized at 1-3, 4-6, and ≥ 7. Our objective was to validate CPT codes against operative time at our institution, as well as further stratify complexity by rib fracture location and surgical approach. The purpose of this study is to validate the current CPT coding schema for SSRF, and to identify potential modifiers that are associated with increased case complexity. We hypothesized that operative time is associated with CPT code, number of fractures repaired, exposure technique, and fracture location.

METHODS

Retrospective review of SSRF cases from October 2010 to March 2020. The primary outcome was the length of the operation (minutes). Predictor variables were CPT code, number of fractures repaired (grouped similarly to CPT codes), fractures repaired:ribs repaired ratio > 1, fracture location (sub-scapular vs. other), and positioning/exposure (supine, lateral, prone, and multiple). Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses were used to assess relationship with operative time.

RESULTS

188 patients underwent repair of 904 fractures. Operative time was significantly associated with both number of ribs repaired and number of fractures repaired (p<0.01). Although operative time varied significantly by CPT group (p<0.01), there was no significant difference between the 4-6 rib and the ≥ 7 rib groups (p = 0.33). By contrast, each group was significantly different from the others when organized by number of fractures repaired (p = 0.04). Operative time was significantly longer when the fractures repaired:ribs repaired ratio was > 1 (p<0.01), even after stratifying by number of ribs repaired. Both multiple positions/exposures (p<0.01), and repair of ≥ 1 sub-scapular fracture (p<0.01) were significantly associated with operative time.

CONCLUSION

Number of fractures repaired provided a more accurate estimation of operative time as compared to number of ribs repaired. Based on these data, we recommend altering the CPT schema for SSRF to involve number of fractures repaired, with modifiers for both multiple positions/exposures and repair of sub-scapular fractures.

摘要

简介

当前的程序术语 (CPT) 代码仅基于固定肋骨的数量对肋骨骨折的外科稳定 (SSRF) 进行分类,肋骨被分为 1-3、4-6 和≥7 根。我们的目的是验证我院 CPT 代码与手术时间的相关性,并通过肋骨骨折位置和手术方法进一步对复杂性进行分层。本研究旨在验证当前的 SSRF CPT 编码方案,并确定与手术复杂性相关的潜在修饰符。我们假设手术时间与 CPT 代码、修复的骨折数量、暴露技术和骨折位置有关。

方法

对 2010 年 10 月至 2020 年 3 月的 SSRF 病例进行回顾性分析。主要结局是手术时间(分钟)。预测变量为 CPT 代码、修复的骨折数量(与 CPT 代码相似分组)、修复的骨折数量:修复的肋骨数量比>1、骨折位置(肩胛下与其他)和定位/暴露(仰卧位、侧卧位、俯卧位和多种)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 时间事件分析评估与手术时间的关系。

结果

188 例患者共修复 904 处骨折。手术时间与修复的肋骨数量和修复的骨折数量均显著相关(p<0.01)。尽管 CPT 组之间的手术时间差异显著(p<0.01),但 4-6 根肋骨组与≥7 根肋骨组之间无显著差异(p=0.33)。相比之下,当根据修复的骨折数量对各组进行组织时,每组与其他组之间均有显著差异(p=0.04)。即使在按修复的肋骨数量分层后,当修复的骨折数量:修复的肋骨数量比>1 时,手术时间也显著延长(p<0.01)。多个位置/暴露(p<0.01)和修复≥1 个肩胛下骨折(p<0.01)与手术时间显著相关。

结论

与修复的肋骨数量相比,修复的骨折数量提供了对手术时间更准确的估计。基于这些数据,我们建议修改 SSRF 的 CPT 方案,包括修复的骨折数量,并对多个位置/暴露和肩胛下骨折的修复进行修饰。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验