Suppr超能文献

乌干达癫痫患者获得生物医学治疗的障碍:一项横断面研究。

Barriers to biomedical care for people with epilepsy in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Neurology Unit, Kampala, Uganda; School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.

School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jan;114(Pt B):107349. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107349. Epub 2020 Sep 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy, a neurological disorder with effective biomedical treatment, remains largely untreated in Uganda. Potential reasons for this treatment gap (TG) include limited access to trained providers and clinics, social stigmata of seizures, cultural beliefs, or lack of public understanding of epilepsy as a treatable condition. The current study aimed to formally evaluate barriers faced by people with epilepsy (PWE) in Uganda when seeking biomedical care.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 435 participants drawn from a community prevalence study were enrolled. We included participants reporting a history of recurrent seizures suggestive of epilepsy, who completed a survey about barriers to obtaining care for their symptoms. Principal axis factor analysis (PFA) using a promax rotation was conducted for data reduction. Frequencies of barrier factors were compared across those who did not seek care for epilepsy (n = 228), those who sought care from biomedical facilities (n = 166), and those who sought care from a traditional or pastoral healer (n = 41).

RESULTS

The PFA yielded a five-factor solution: 1) logistical and actual costs; 2) treatment effectiveness; 3) influence of the opinion of others; 4) doctors' care; and 5) contextual factors impacting decision-making. Variables related to logistical and actual costs were most endorsed. Comparison of groups by care sought did not reveal a difference in endorsement of factors, with the exception that those who sought biomedical care were more likely to endorse factors related to doctors' care compared with those that sought care from traditional or pastoral healers (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

People with repetitive seizures in Uganda report several barriers to obtaining biomedical care in Uganda, with those related to practical and actual costs endorsed the most. It is imperative that interventions developed to reduce the TG in Uganda consider these practical issues to improve access to effective epilepsy care. This article is part of the Special Issue "The Intersection of Culture, Resources, and Disease: Epilepsy Care in Uganda.

摘要

目的

尽管在医学上可以有效治疗癫痫,但在乌干达,这种神经疾病仍有很大一部分患者未得到治疗。导致这种治疗缺口的潜在原因包括:获得专业医疗人员和诊所的机会有限、癫痫发作的社会耻辱感、文化信仰、或公众对癫痫作为一种可治疗疾病的理解不足。本研究旨在正式评估乌干达癫痫患者(PWE)在寻求生物医学治疗时所面临的障碍。

方法

在一项横断面研究中,我们从社区患病率研究中抽取了 435 名参与者。我们纳入了报告有反复发作的癫痫样发作史的参与者,他们完成了一份关于获得症状治疗的障碍的调查。使用 promax 旋转进行主成分因子分析(PFA)以进行数据简化。比较了未因癫痫寻求治疗的参与者(n=228)、向生物医学机构寻求治疗的参与者(n=166)和向传统或牧区治疗师寻求治疗的参与者(n=41)在障碍因素上的差异。

结果

PFA 产生了一个五因素解决方案:1)后勤和实际成本;2)治疗效果;3)他人意见的影响;4)医生的护理;5)影响决策的背景因素。与后勤和实际成本相关的变量最受认可。按所寻求的治疗方法对各组进行比较,未发现对因素的认可存在差异,唯一的例外是,与向传统或牧区治疗师寻求治疗的患者相比,向生物医学机构寻求治疗的患者更可能认可与医生护理相关的因素(P=0.005)。

结论

乌干达反复发作癫痫的患者报告了在乌干达获得生物医学治疗的多个障碍,其中与实际和实际成本相关的障碍最受认可。为了减少乌干达的治疗缺口而制定的干预措施必须考虑到这些实际问题,以改善获得有效癫痫治疗的机会。本文是“文化、资源和疾病的交集:乌干达的癫痫护理”特刊的一部分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验