Duke Division of Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Department of Neurosurgery, Box 3807, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Duke Global Health Institute, 310 Trent Dr, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Department of Mental Health and Community Psychology, Makerere University School of Psychology, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jan;114(Pt B):107314. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107314. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent, treatable neurological diseases globally. In sub-Saharan Africa, people with epilepsy (PWE) frequently seek treatment from traditional or pastoral healers, who are more accessible than biomedical care providers. This often contributes to the substantial time delay in obtaining adequate biomedical care for these patients. In Uganda, the few biomedical providers who can treat epilepsy cannot meet the great need for epilepsy care. Additionally, patients are often hesitant to seek biomedical care, often preferring the easily accessible and trusted sociocultural treatment options. This study sought to elucidate the barriers to biomedical care for PWE as well as identify potential solutions to overcome these barriers from various stakeholder perspectives.
This study used qualitative research methods. Semistructured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with four major stakeholder groups: PWE or family members of PWE, neurologists and psychiatrists, traditional healers, and pastoral healers. All interviews and focus group discussions that were in English were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Those that were not in English were translated live and audio recorded. A translator later translated the non-English portion of audio recording to ensure proper interpretation. Two independent coders coded the dataset and conducted an inter-rater reliability (IRR) assessment to ensure reliable coding of the data. Thematic analysis was then performed to discern themes from the data and compare nuances between each of the study design groups.
Participants discussed several different causes of epilepsy ranging from spiritual to biological causes, often incorporating elements of both. Commonly endorsed spiritual causes of epilepsy included witchcraft and ancestral spirits. Commonly endorsed biological causes included genetics, fever, malaria, and brain injury. For patients and families, beliefs about the cause of epilepsy often played a role in whom they chose to seek treatment from. Three major barriers to biomedical care were discussed: practical barriers, medical infrastructure barriers, and barriers related to stigma. Practical barriers related to issues such as transportation, cost of medical care, and distance to the nearest healthcare facility. Under medical infrastructure, drug stock-outs and lack of access to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were the most consistent problems stated among patients. Stigma was heavily discussed and brought up by nearly every participant. Additionally, three significant solutions to improving epilepsy care in Uganda were highlighted by participants: collaboration among treatment providers, community sensitization efforts to address stigma, and building medical infrastructure. Within building infrastructure, all participant types, except traditional healers, proposed the development of an epilepsy clinic designed to specifically treat epilepsy.
Based on these findings, there are four critical interventions that should be considered for improving epilepsy care in Uganda: the creation of dedicated epilepsy clinics, infrastructure strengthening to address medication stock-outs, community outreach programs for sensitization, and collaboration between biomedical providers and traditional healers. This article is part of the Special Issue "The Intersection of Culture, Resources, and Disease: Epilepsy Care in Uganda".
癫痫是全球最普遍、可治疗的神经疾病之一。在撒哈拉以南非洲,癫痫患者(PWE)经常寻求传统或牧区治疗师的治疗,而这些治疗师比生物医学提供者更容易获得。这往往导致这些患者获得足够的生物医学治疗的时间大大延迟。在乌干达,少数能够治疗癫痫的生物医学提供者无法满足巨大的癫痫护理需求。此外,患者往往不愿意寻求生物医学治疗,通常更倾向于选择容易获得且受信任的社会文化治疗选择。本研究旨在从各种利益相关者的角度阐明 PWE 获得生物医学治疗的障碍,并确定克服这些障碍的潜在解决方案。
本研究采用定性研究方法。对四个主要利益相关者群体进行了半结构式访谈和焦点小组讨论:PWE 或 PWE 的家属、神经病学家和精神科医生、传统治疗师和牧区治疗师。所有以英语进行的访谈和焦点小组讨论都进行了录音,并逐字记录。非英语的则现场翻译并录音。一名翻译随后将非英语部分的录音翻译成英文,以确保正确解释。两名独立的编码员对数据集进行编码,并进行了内部评分员可靠性(IRR)评估,以确保数据的可靠编码。然后进行主题分析,以从数据中辨别主题,并比较每个研究设计组之间的细微差别。
参与者讨论了癫痫的几种不同原因,从精神原因到生物原因都有,通常同时包含这两个方面。常见的被认可的癫痫精神原因包括巫术和祖先的灵魂。常见的被认可的生物原因包括遗传、发烧、疟疾和脑损伤。对于患者和家属来说,对癫痫病因的信念往往会影响他们选择向谁寻求治疗。讨论了三个获得生物医学治疗的主要障碍:实际障碍、医疗基础设施障碍和与耻辱感相关的障碍。实际障碍与交通、医疗费用和到最近医疗机构的距离等问题有关。在医疗基础设施方面,药物缺货和无法获得抗癫痫药物(AEDs)是患者最常提到的问题。耻辱感是几乎每个参与者都提到的一个重要问题。此外,参与者还强调了改善乌干达癫痫护理的三个重要解决方案:治疗提供者之间的合作、针对耻辱感的社区宣传工作以及医疗基础设施的建设。在基础设施建设方面,除了传统治疗师外,所有参与者类型都提议建立专门治疗癫痫的癫痫诊所。
基于这些发现,应该考虑以下四项关键干预措施来改善乌干达的癫痫护理:创建专门的癫痫诊所、加强基础设施以解决药物缺货问题、开展社区外联计划以提高认识,以及生物医学提供者与传统治疗师之间的合作。本文是“文化、资源和疾病的交集:乌干达的癫痫护理”特刊的一部分。