• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨 3D-TOF-MRA 中颈动脉支架导致的信号丢失。

Investigating Signal Loss due to a Carotid Artery Stent in 3D-TOF-MRA.

机构信息

Radiology Department, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations Shinbeppu Hospital.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021 Sep 1;20(3):303-311. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0083. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

DOI:10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0083
PMID:32963183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8424025/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In this study, we investigated the factors of signal loss out because of the presence of a stent and optimized imaging parameters for improvement in depiction ability.

METHODS

We investigated the relationship between the stent type and magnetic susceptibility effect by measuring the signal value between the inside and outside of the stent with different Bw and TE for two different kinds of stents respectively. Similarly, flip angles were changed for two different kinds of stents respectively to the signal intensity between the inside and the outside of the stent was measured, in which examine the relationship between the stent type and the Ernst angles in RF-shielding effect. The conventional imaging parameters and the optimum imaging parameters for each stent obtained from the result of the phantom experiment were examined. Optimized 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) was performed and compared with conventional 3D-TOF-MRA and computed tomography angiography (CTA).

RESULTS

The influence of the magnetic susceptibility effect is small in the central part of Carotid Wallstent and in PRECISE, and large in the Carotid Wallstent at the both ends. The influence of RF-shielding effect was large at PRECISE, where the Ernst angle was greatly shifted while the effect is no longer influenced at Carotid Wallstent. Both Carotid Wallstent and PRECISE made imaging capability improved by optimizing the imaging parameters.

CONCLUSION

During clinical imaging of patients post-carotid artery stenting (CAS) using our protocol, the ability to visualize blood vessels was improved. Thus, we demonstrated that the ability of 3D-TOF-MRA post-CAS was improved via optimizing imaging parameters.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨因支架存在而导致信号丢失的因素,并优化成像参数以提高描绘能力。

方法

我们分别测量了两种不同支架的内部和外部之间的信号值,以研究支架类型和磁化率效应之间的关系,同时分别改变两种不同支架的翻转角,以测量支架内部和外部之间的信号强度,从而研究支架类型和 RF 屏蔽效应中的 Ernst 角之间的关系。我们检查了从体模实验结果获得的每个支架的常规成像参数和最佳成像参数。对优化的 3D 时间飞跃磁共振血管造影(3D-TOF-MRA)进行了检查,并与常规 3D-TOF-MRA 和计算机断层血管造影(CTA)进行了比较。

结果

在颈动脉 Wallstent 和 PRECISE 的中心部分,磁化率效应的影响较小,而在颈动脉 Wallstent 的两端影响较大。在 PRECISE 中,RF 屏蔽效应的影响较大,其中 Ernst 角发生了很大的偏移,而在颈动脉 Wallstent 中则不再受到影响。通过优化成像参数,颈动脉 Wallstent 和 PRECISE 都提高了成像能力。

结论

在使用我们的方案对颈动脉支架置入术后患者进行临床成像时,血管可视化能力得到了提高。因此,我们证明了通过优化成像参数可以提高 3D-TOF-MRA 术后颈动脉支架置入术的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/e10b744441aa/mrms-20-303-g8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/50ff68550ef2/mrms-20-303-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/694c3a488ee8/mrms-20-303-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/fe50d1af26e8/mrms-20-303-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/f2833e02908d/mrms-20-303-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/31272ff24aac/mrms-20-303-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/e36b6294dbb0/mrms-20-303-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/f8bed9c1a9c8/mrms-20-303-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/e10b744441aa/mrms-20-303-g8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/50ff68550ef2/mrms-20-303-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/694c3a488ee8/mrms-20-303-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/fe50d1af26e8/mrms-20-303-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/f2833e02908d/mrms-20-303-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/31272ff24aac/mrms-20-303-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/e36b6294dbb0/mrms-20-303-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/f8bed9c1a9c8/mrms-20-303-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa6f/8424025/e10b744441aa/mrms-20-303-g8.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating Signal Loss due to a Carotid Artery Stent in 3D-TOF-MRA.探讨 3D-TOF-MRA 中颈动脉支架导致的信号丢失。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021 Sep 1;20(3):303-311. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0083. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
2
Comparing different MR angiography strategies of carotid stents in a vascular flow model: toward stent-specific recommendations in MR follow-up.比较血管流模型中颈动脉支架的不同磁共振血管成像策略:为磁共振随访中的支架特异性建议提供依据。
Neuroradiology. 2011 May;53(5):359-65. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0753-y. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
3
Non-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography can evaluate restenosis after carotid artery stenting with the Carotid Wallstent.非增强磁共振血管造影术可评估使用颈动脉Wallstent支架进行颈动脉支架置入术后的再狭窄情况。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Sep;156(9):1713-9. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2142-5. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
4
Optimization of MR Parameters of 3D TOF-MRA for Various Intracranial Stents at 3.0T MRI.3.0T磁共振成像下不同颅内支架3D TOF-MRA磁共振参数的优化
Neurointervention. 2011 Aug;6(2):71-7. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2011.6.2.71. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
5
[MRI of carotid stents: influence of stent properties and sequence parameters on visualization of the carotid artery lumen].[颈动脉支架的磁共振成像:支架特性和序列参数对颈动脉管腔可视化的影响]
Rofo. 2005 Mar;177(3):375-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813878.
6
[Imaging Parameter Optimization of 3D Phase Contrast-MRA to Reduce Susceptibility-artifact and Radiofrequency-shielding around the Intracranial Stent].[三维相位对比磁共振血管造影成像参数优化以减少颅内支架周围的磁化率伪影和射频屏蔽]
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2018;74(11):1293-1301. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2018_JSRT_74.11.1293.
7
[Imaging Parameter Optimization of Non-contrast Three-dimensional Time-of-flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Patients with Intracranial Stents Using a 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging System].[使用1.5T磁共振成像系统对颅内支架置入患者进行非增强三维时间飞跃磁共振血管造影成像参数优化]
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2019;75(12):1437-1445. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2019_JSRT_75.12.1437.
8
Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.三维对比增强磁共振血管造影在颈动脉支架置入术规划中的准确性和实用性。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Aug;46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.03.051. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
9
[Visualization of Four Intracranial Stents and In-stent Stenosis with Stenotic Models by 3D-TOF-MRA].[通过三维时间飞跃法磁共振血管造影术对四个颅内支架及伴有狭窄模型的支架内狭窄进行可视化研究]
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2019;75(8):747-754. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2019_JSRT_75.8.747.
10
Noninvasive imaging after stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and 64-row multidetector computed tomography--a pilot study.颅内动脉瘤支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后的无创成像:3-T磁共振成像与64排多层螺旋计算机断层扫描的比较——一项初步研究
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):573-82. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318224e528.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Various Non-Contrast-Enhanced MRA Techniques on Lumen Visibility in Vascular Flow Models with a Surpass Evolve Flow Diverter.各种非增强磁共振血管造影(MRA)技术对配备Surpass Evolve血流分流器的血管流动模型中管腔可视性的影响。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 30;14(11):1146. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111146.
2
Bilateral Low-Flow Type-D Dural Carotid-Cavernous Fistula: Diagnosis and Treatment with 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography.双侧低流量型 D 型硬脑膜颈动脉海绵窦瘘:3D 时间飞跃磁共振血管成像诊断与治疗。
Am J Case Rep. 2024 Mar 20;25:e942833. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.942833.
3
Trans-radial versus trans-femoral approach for cerebral angiography: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurovascular stent artifacts in 3D-TOF and 3D-PCMRI: Influence of stent design on flow measurement.三维时间飞跃法和三维对比增强磁共振血管成像中的神经血管支架伪影:支架设计对血流测量的影响。
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jan;81(1):560-572. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27352. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Effects of Imaging Parameters on the Quality of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of Cerebral Aneurysms Treated Using Stent-Assisted Coiling: A Phantom Study.成像参数对使用支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗的脑动脉瘤对比增强磁共振血管造影质量的影响:一项体模研究
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017 Apr 10;16(2):146-151. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2016-0042. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
3
Non-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography can evaluate restenosis after carotid artery stenting with the Carotid Wallstent.
经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于脑血管造影:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Jun;18(2):235-243. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.123309. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
Usefulness of 3D T1-Turbo Spin Echo Imaging for the Evaluation of Intracranial Stent Placement.3D T1加权快速自旋回波成像在颅内支架置入评估中的应用价值
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2023;17(1):1-7. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2022-0039. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
非增强磁共振血管造影术可评估使用颈动脉Wallstent支架进行颈动脉支架置入术后的再狭窄情况。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Sep;156(9):1713-9. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2142-5. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
4
Time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA on 3.0T: a non-invasive follow-up technique after stent-assisted coil embolization of the intracranial aneurysm.3.0T 时间分辨三维对比增强磁共振血管成像:颅内动脉瘤支架辅助线圈栓塞后的一种非侵入性随访技术。
Korean J Radiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;12(6):662-70. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2011.12.6.662. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
5
Comparing different MR angiography strategies of carotid stents in a vascular flow model: toward stent-specific recommendations in MR follow-up.比较血管流模型中颈动脉支架的不同磁共振血管成像策略:为磁共振随访中的支架特异性建议提供依据。
Neuroradiology. 2011 May;53(5):359-65. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0753-y. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
6
Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.颈动脉支架:在 1.5T 和 3T 磁共振成像下使用 CT 血管造影和对比增强磁共振血管造影对不同支架设计和尺寸的体外比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Nov;30(10):1993-7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1743. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振血管造影对颈内动脉疾病的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):2237-48. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.509877. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
8
Intracranial aneurysm stenting: follow-up with MR angiography.颅内动脉瘤支架置入术:磁共振血管造影随访
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Aug;24(2):418-22. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20642.
9
In vivo evaluation of the carotid wallstent on three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced MR angiography: influence of artifacts on the visibility of stent lumina.三维对比剂增强磁共振血管造影对颈动脉壁支架的体内评估:伪影对支架管腔可视性的影响
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 May;16(5):669-77. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000156187.35215.22.
10
[MRI of carotid stents: influence of stent properties and sequence parameters on visualization of the carotid artery lumen].[颈动脉支架的磁共振成像:支架特性和序列参数对颈动脉管腔可视化的影响]
Rofo. 2005 Mar;177(3):375-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813878.