• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对加拿大一项名为“高危新生儿急性护理”(ACoRN)教育项目在中国新生儿重症监护室的评估。

An evaluation of Acute Care of at-Risk Newborns (ACoRN), a Canadian education program, in Chinese neonatal nurseries.

作者信息

Aziz Khalid, Ma Xiaolu, Lockyer Jocelyn, McMillan Douglas, Ye Xiang Y, Du Lizhong, Lee Shoo K, Singhal Nalini

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.

Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Apr 24;25(6):351-357. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxz050. eCollection 2020 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/pch/pxz050
PMID:32963647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7492626/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Acute Care of at-Risk Newborns (ACoRN) program was developed in Canada to train health care providers in the identification and management of newborns who are at-risk and/or become unwell after birth. The ACoRN process follows a stepwise framework that enables evaluation, decision, and action irrespective of caregiver experience. This study examined the hypothesis that the ACoRN educational program improved clinical practices and outcomes in China.

METHODS

In a before-and-after study, ACoRN training was provided to physicians, neonatal nurses, and administrators in 16 county hospitals in Zhejiang, PRC. Demographic and clinical data were collected on babies admitted to neonatal units before (May 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009) and after (June 1, 2010 to April 30, 2012) training.

RESULTS

A total of 4,310 babies (1,865 pre- and 2,445 post-training) from 14 sites were included. There were more in-hospital births (97.8% versus 95.6%, P<0.01) in the post-training epoch, fewer babies needing resuscitation (12.7% versus 16.0%, P=0.02), and more babies finishing their care in hospital (67.4% versus 53.1%, P<0.0001). After training, significantly more babies were evaluated as having respiratory distress at admission (14.2% versus 9.4%, P<0.0001); more babies had saturation, glucose and temperature measured on admission and at discharge; and more babies received intravenous fluids (86.3% versus 72.8%, P<0.0001). No significant improvements were noted in mortality (0.49% [post] versus 0.8% [pre], P=0.19 and adjusted odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.23 to 1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

ACoRN training significantly increased patient evaluations and changed clinical practices. However, we were unable to ascertain improvement in morbidity or mortality.

摘要

背景

加拿大开发了高危新生儿急性护理(ACoRN)项目,旨在培训医疗保健人员识别和管理出生后有风险及/或身体不适的新生儿。ACoRN流程遵循一个逐步的框架,无论护理人员的经验如何,都能进行评估、决策和采取行动。本研究检验了ACoRN教育项目改善中国临床实践和结果的假设。

方法

在一项前后对照研究中,为中国浙江省16家县级医院的医生、新生儿护士和管理人员提供了ACoRN培训。收集了培训前(2008年5月1日至2009年3月31日)和培训后(2010年6月1日至2012年4月30日)入住新生儿病房的婴儿的人口统计学和临床数据。

结果

共纳入了来自14个地点的4310名婴儿(培训前1865名,培训后2445名)。培训后时期的院内分娩更多(97.8%对95.6%,P<0.01),需要复苏的婴儿更少(12.7%对16.0%,P=0.02),在医院完成护理的婴儿更多(67.4%对53.1%,P<0.0001)。培训后,入院时被评估为有呼吸窘迫的婴儿显著增多(14.2%对9.4%,P<0.0001);更多婴儿在入院时和出院时进行了血氧饱和度、血糖和体温测量;更多婴儿接受了静脉输液(86.3%对72.8%,P<0.0001)。死亡率没有显著改善(培训后为0.49%,培训前为0.8%,P=0.19,调整后的优势比为0.54,95%置信区间:0.23至1.29)。

结论

ACoRN培训显著增加了患者评估并改变了临床实践。然而,我们无法确定发病率或死亡率是否有所改善。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of Acute Care of at-Risk Newborns (ACoRN), a Canadian education program, in Chinese neonatal nurseries.对加拿大一项名为“高危新生儿急性护理”(ACoRN)教育项目在中国新生儿重症监护室的评估。
Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Apr 24;25(6):351-357. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxz050. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Acute Care of At-Risk Newborns (ACoRN): quantitative and qualitative educational evaluation of the program in a region of China.高危新生儿急救护理(ACoRN):在中国某地区对该项目进行的定量和定性教育评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Jun 20;12:44. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-44.
3
Neonatal stabilization in Canada: Updates to acute care of at-risk newborns (ACoRN) practices and programming.加拿大的新生儿稳定护理:高危新生儿急性护理(ACoRN)实践与规划的更新
Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Jun 13;27(3):190-191. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac029. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Implementation and evaluation of the Helping Babies Breathe curriculum in three resource limited settings: does Helping Babies Breathe save lives? A study protocol.在三个资源有限地区实施和评估“帮助婴儿呼吸”课程:“帮助婴儿呼吸”能挽救生命吗?一项研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Mar 26;14:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-116.
5
Collaborative Implementation Strategy for Newborn Resuscitation and Essential Care Training in the Dominican Republic.多米尼加共和国新生儿复苏与基本护理培训的协作实施策略
Front Public Health. 2017 Mar 31;5:61. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00061. eCollection 2017.
6
Impact of managed clinical networks on NHS specialist neonatal services in England: population based study.管理型临床网络对英格兰国民保健服务专科新生儿服务的影响:基于人群的研究。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 3;344:e2105. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2105.
7
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.臀位的阴道分娩
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9.
8
Quality of Early Essential Newborn Care in hospitals in Gaza: a pre-intervention and post-intervention study.加沙地区医院早期基本新生儿护理质量:一项干预前与干预后研究
Lancet. 2021 Jul;398 Suppl 1:S2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01488-4.
9
Effects of a course in neonatal resuscitation--evaluation of an educational intervention on the standard of neonatal resuscitation.新生儿复苏课程的效果——对新生儿复苏标准的教育干预评估
Resuscitation. 2006 Mar;68(3):385-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.07.012. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
10
Effect of a statewide neonatal resuscitation training program on Apgar scores among high-risk neonates in Illinois.伊利诺伊州全州新生儿复苏培训项目对该州高危新生儿阿氏评分的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):648-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.648.

本文引用的文献

1
Part 7: Neonatal resuscitation: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.第7部分:新生儿复苏:2015年国际心肺复苏与心血管急救科学及治疗建议共识。
Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:e169-201. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.045. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
2
Mortality Rate for Children under 5 Years of Age in Zhejiang Province, China from 1997 to 2012.1997年至2012年中国浙江省5岁以下儿童死亡率
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 4;10(6):e0127770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127770. eCollection 2015.
3
Frequent brief on-site simulation training and reduction in 24-h neonatal mortality--an educational intervention study.频繁的简短现场模拟培训与24小时新生儿死亡率降低——一项教育干预研究
Resuscitation. 2015 Aug;93:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 May 6.
4
Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival.每个新生儿:超越生存的进展、优先事项和潜力。
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):189-205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.1990-2013 年期间全球、区域和国家层面的新生儿、婴儿和 5 岁以下儿童死亡率:2013 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 13;384(9947):957-79. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60497-9. Epub 2014 May 2.
6
Stillbirth and newborn mortality in India after helping babies breathe training.印度开展新生儿复苏培训后,死产和新生儿死亡率下降。
Pediatrics. 2013 Feb;131(2):e344-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2112. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
7
Neonatal stabilization and postresuscitation care.新生儿稳定和复苏后护理。
Clin Perinatol. 2012 Dec;39(4):901-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.09.007.
8
Acute Care of At-Risk Newborns (ACoRN): quantitative and qualitative educational evaluation of the program in a region of China.高危新生儿急救护理(ACoRN):在中国某地区对该项目进行的定量和定性教育评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Jun 20;12:44. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-44.
9
What is the impact of structured resuscitation training on healthcare practitioners, their clients and the wider service? A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 20.结构化复苏培训对医疗保健从业者、他们的客户以及更广泛的服务有什么影响?BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 20 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e349-85. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.681222.
10
Effects of the introduction of the WHO "Surgical Safety Checklist" on in-hospital mortality: a cohort study.WHO“手术安全检查表”引入对院内死亡率的影响:一项队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jan;255(1):44-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823779ae.