Nezhat Camran, Nguyen Kimsa, Ackroyd Eliza, Roman Robert A, Rambhatla Anupama, Nezhat Azadeh, Asiaii Atena
Center for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Camran Nezhat Institute, Palo Alto, USA.
Cureus. 2020 Aug 19;12(8):e9882. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9882.
Background Laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy with or without robotic assistance is known for its benefits as a definitive treatment for severe endometriosis. Undiagnosed endometriosis is common in patients with symptomatic fibroids or chronic pelvic pain. There are minimal studies that outline the safety and feasibility of nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy for other complex pelvic pathology in addition to endometriosis. Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of hospital readmission, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and long-term pain relief after laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy for severe endometriosis and complex benign pelvic pathology. Study design We performed a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy with and without robotic-assistance with a high-volume minimally invasive endoscopic surgeon between November 2017 and December 2019. Results A total of 112 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were no cases of vaginal cuff dehiscence, venous thromboembolism, genitourinary system injury, gastrointestinal tract injury, vessel injury, nerve injury, sepsis, or death. Three patients required postoperative hospital admission for the management of umbilical cellulitis, acute blood loss anemia, and possible Addison's crisis. Other postoperative complications included allergic reaction to adhesives (1.8%) and urinary retention (0.9%). All patients reported significant pain relief at the time of their postoperative visits. Three patients reported return of pain symptoms within the first seven months after surgery, with one requiring an additional surgery for persistent pain. Conclusions Laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy with or without robotic assistance is a safe and feasible alternative that provides long-term symptom relief in patients undergoing hysterectomy for a variety of indications.
腹腔镜保留神经改良根治性子宫切除术,无论有无机器人辅助,作为重度子宫内膜异位症的一种确定性治疗方法,其益处已为人所知。未被诊断出的子宫内膜异位症在有症状的子宫肌瘤或慢性盆腔疼痛患者中很常见。除子宫内膜异位症外,关于保留神经改良根治性子宫切除术治疗其他复杂盆腔病变的安全性和可行性的研究极少。目的:本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜保留神经改良根治性子宫切除术治疗重度子宫内膜异位症和复杂良性盆腔病变后的住院再入院率、术中及术后并发症以及长期疼痛缓解情况。研究设计:我们对2017年11月至2019年12月期间由一位高年资微创内镜外科医生进行的有或无机器人辅助的腹腔镜保留神经改良根治性子宫切除术的患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。结果:共有112例患者符合纳入标准。没有发生阴道断端裂开、静脉血栓栓塞、泌尿生殖系统损伤、胃肠道损伤、血管损伤、神经损伤、败血症或死亡的病例。3例患者术后因脐部蜂窝织炎、急性失血贫血和可能的艾迪生病危象而需要住院治疗。其他术后并发症包括对粘合剂的过敏反应(1.8%)和尿潴留(0.9%)。所有患者在术后随访时均报告疼痛明显缓解。3例患者在术后前七个月内报告疼痛症状复发,其中1例因持续性疼痛需要再次手术。结论:腹腔镜保留神经改良根治性子宫切除术,无论有无机器人辅助,都是一种安全可行的替代方法,可为因各种适应症接受子宫切除术的患者提供长期症状缓解。