• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“对我来说很重要”:一项关于早期乳腺癌老年患者中共同决策和患者偏好的定性分析。

"It's important to me": A qualitative analysis on shared decision-making and patient preferences in older adults with early-stage breast cancer.

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2021 Feb;30(2):167-175. doi: 10.1002/pon.5545. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1002/pon.5545
PMID:32964517
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Shared decision-making (SDM) occurs when physicians and patients jointly select treatment that aligns with patient care goals. Incorporating patient preferences into the decision-making process is integral to successful decision-making. This study explores factors influencing treatment selection in older patients with early-stage breast cancer (EBC).

METHODS

This qualitative study included women age ≥65 years with EBC. To understand role preferences, patients completed the Control Preferences Scale. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore patients' treatment selection rationale. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a constant comparative method identifying major themes related to treatment selection.

RESULTS

Of 33 patients, the majority (48%) desired shared responsibility in treatment decision-making. Interviews revealed that EBC treatment incorporated three domains: Intrinsic and extrinsic influences, clinical characteristics, and patient values. Patients considered 19 treatment selection themes, the most prioritized including physician trust and physical side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Because preferences and approach to treatment selection varied widely in this sample of older, EBC patients, more research is needed to determine best practices for preference incorporation to optimize SDM at the time of treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

当医生和患者共同选择符合患者护理目标的治疗方案时,就会发生共享决策(SDM)。将患者的偏好纳入决策过程对于成功决策至关重要。本研究探讨了影响老年早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者治疗选择的因素。

方法

本定性研究纳入了年龄≥65 岁的 EBC 女性患者。为了了解角色偏好,患者完成了控制偏好量表。进行半结构化访谈,以探讨患者的治疗选择依据。使用恒定性比较方法分析访谈记录,确定与治疗选择相关的主要主题。

结果

在 33 名患者中,大多数(48%)希望在治疗决策中共同承担责任。访谈显示,EBC 治疗包含三个领域:内在和外在影响、临床特征和患者价值观。患者考虑了 19 个治疗选择主题,最优先考虑的主题包括医生信任和身体副作用。

结论

由于本研究中这组老年 EBC 患者的偏好和治疗选择方法差异很大,因此需要进一步研究确定最佳的偏好纳入方法,以在治疗决策时优化 SDM。

相似文献

1
"It's important to me": A qualitative analysis on shared decision-making and patient preferences in older adults with early-stage breast cancer.“对我来说很重要”:一项关于早期乳腺癌老年患者中共同决策和患者偏好的定性分析。
Psychooncology. 2021 Feb;30(2):167-175. doi: 10.1002/pon.5545. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
2
Importance of quality-of-life priorities and preferences surrounding treatment decision making in patients with cancer and oncology clinicians.癌症患者及其肿瘤临床医生在治疗决策中对生活质量优先事项和偏好的重视。
Cancer. 2020 Aug 1;126(15):3534-3541. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32961. Epub 2020 May 19.
3
Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly women with breast cancer: patients' perspectives on information giving and decision making.老年乳腺癌女性的辅助化疗:患者对信息提供和决策的看法。
Psychooncology. 2013 Dec;22(12):2729-35. doi: 10.1002/pon.3338. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
4
Trust but Verify: Exploring the Role of Treatment-Related Information and Patient-Physician Trust in Shared Decision Making Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.信任但需验证:探索转移性乳腺癌患者在共享决策中的治疗相关信息和医患信任的作用。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Oct;35(5):885-892. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01538-x.
5
Is There a Relationship between Shared Decision Making and Breast Cancer Patients' Trust in Their Medical Oncologists?共享决策与乳腺癌患者对肿瘤医生信任之间是否存在关系?
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19889905. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
6
Elicitation of preferences in the second half of the shared decision making process needs attention; a qualitative study.在共同决策过程的后半阶段引出偏好需要关注:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05476-z.
7
Shared Decision-Making in Oncology: Preferences in Older versus Younger Patients of an Oncology Clinic - A Conjoint Analysis.肿瘤学中的共同决策:肿瘤学诊所中老年与年轻患者的偏好 - 联合分析。
Oncol Res Treat. 2021;44(1-2):4-11. doi: 10.1159/000512593. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
8
Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.手术中的共同决策:患者和外科医生偏好的范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01211-0.
9
"I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology.“我需要知道是什么在驱动着……”:个体化肿瘤学中实施共享决策的挑战与策略。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):555-562. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0615. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
Treatment Decision Making and Financial Toxicity in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.转移性乳腺癌女性的治疗决策和财务毒性。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Feb;21(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissecting autonomy in a resource-constrained setting: a descriptive qualitative study of women's decisions on the surgical treatment of early breast cancer in northern Sri Lanka.剖析资源受限环境下的自主权:对斯里兰卡北部女性关于早期乳腺癌手术治疗决策的描述性定性研究
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2494396. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2494396. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Chatbots for breast cancer education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于乳腺癌教育的聊天机器人:系统评价与荟萃分析
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Dec 27;33(1):55. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09096-9.
3
Exploring Patient Preferences Related to Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Disease Management.
探索慢性病管理中与共同决策相关的患者偏好
Cureus. 2024 Sep 25;16(9):e70214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70214. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Understanding Patient Preferences Regarding the Important Determinants of Breast Cancer Treatment: A Narrative Scoping Review.了解患者对乳腺癌治疗重要决定因素的偏好:一项叙述性范围综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Oct 31;17:2679-2706. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S432821. eCollection 2023.
5
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Older Women with Early-Stage (Non-Metastatic) Breast Cancer-An Updated Systematic Review of the Literature.老年女性早期(非转移性)乳腺癌的全面老年评估:文献的更新系统评价。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 7;30(9):8294-8309. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090602.
6
A survey of surgical patients' perspectives and preferences towards general anesthesia techniques and shared-decision making.一项关于手术患者对全身麻醉技术和共同决策的看法和偏好的调查。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug 17;23(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02219-5.
7
What makes the palliative care initial encounter meaningful? A descriptive study with patients with cancer, family carers and palliative care professionals.姑息治疗初始访视的意义是什么?一项针对癌症患者、家庭照顾者和姑息治疗专业人员的描述性研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Sep;37(8):1252-1265. doi: 10.1177/02692163231183998. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
8
Older adults with advanced cancer are selective in sharing and seeking information with social networks.晚期癌症老年患者在与社交网络分享和寻求信息时具有选择性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Oct;105(10):3116-3122. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Decision regret regarding treatments among women with early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review protocol.早期乳腺癌女性治疗决策后悔的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 17;12(3):e058425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058425.
10
The Role of Shared Decision-Making in Personalised Medicine: Opening the Debate.共同决策在个性化医疗中的作用:开启辩论
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Feb 10;15(2):215. doi: 10.3390/ph15020215.