Suppr超能文献

预访情境数据收集对医患沟通和患者激活的影响:一项随机试验。

Impact of Pre-visit Contextual Data Collection on Patient-Physician Communication and Patient Activation: a Randomized Trial.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, College of Nursing, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3321-3329. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06583-7. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient contextual data (PCD) are often missing from electronic health records, limiting the opportunity to incorporate preferences and life circumstances into care. Engaging patients through tools that collect and summarize such data may improve communication and patient activation. However, differential tool adoption by race might widen health care disparities.

OBJECTIVE

Determine if a digital tool designed to collect and present PCD improves communication and patient activation; secondarily, evaluate if use impacts outcomes by race.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A pragmatic, two-armed, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted during 2019 in a primary care setting.

INTERVENTION

The PCD tool (PatientWisdom) invited patients to identify preferences, values, goals, and barriers to care. Patients were randomized to a standard pre-visit email or facilitated enrollment with dedicated outreach to encourage use of the tool.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcomes of interest were post-visit patient communication and patient activation measured by the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) and Patient Activation Measure (PAM), respectively. Outcomes were evaluated using treatment-on-the-treated (TOT) and intention-to-treat (ITT) principles.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 301 patients were enrolled. Facilitated enrollment resulted in a five-fold increase in uptake of the PCD tool. TOT analysis indicated that the PCD tool was associated with notable increases in specific CAT items rated as excellent: "treated me with respect" (+ 13 percentage points; p = 0.04), "showed interest in my ideas" (+ 14 percentage points; p = 0.03), "showed care and concern" (+ 16 percentage points; p = 0.02), and "spent about the right amount of time with me" (+ 11 percentage points; p = 0.05). There were no significant pre/post-visit differences in PAM scores between arms (- 4.41 percentage points; p = 0.58). ITT results were similar. We saw no evidence of the treatment effect varying by race in ITT or TOT analyses.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The inclusion of PCD enhanced essential aspects of patient-provider communication but did not affect patient activation. Outcomes did not differ by race.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clincaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03766841.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录中经常缺少患者的上下文数据(PCD),这限制了将偏好和生活环境纳入治疗的机会。通过收集和总结此类数据的工具来与患者互动,可能会改善沟通和患者的积极性。然而,不同种族之间工具的使用差异可能会扩大医疗保健差距。

目的

确定设计用于收集和呈现 PCD 的数字工具是否可以改善沟通和患者的积极性;其次,评估工具的使用是否会因种族而影响结果。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项在 2019 年在初级保健环境中进行的实用、双臂、非盲、随机对照试验。

干预

PCD 工具(PatientWisdom)邀请患者识别偏好、价值观、目标和治疗障碍。患者被随机分配到标准的就诊前电子邮件或通过专门的外展来促进工具的使用。

主要结果和措施

感兴趣的结果是通过沟通评估工具(CAT)和患者激活量表(PAM)分别衡量就诊后的患者沟通和患者的积极性。使用治疗方法(TOT)和意向治疗(ITT)原则评估结果。

主要结果

共纳入 301 名患者。通过促进工具的使用,PCD 工具的使用率增加了五倍。TOT 分析表明,PCD 工具与特定 CAT 项目的显著增加有关,这些项目的评分被评为优秀:“尊重我”(增加 13 个百分点;p = 0.04)、“对我的想法感兴趣”(增加 14 个百分点;p = 0.03)、“表现出关心和关注”(增加 16 个百分点;p = 0.02)和“与我相处的时间恰到好处”(增加 11 个百分点;p = 0.05)。在工具使用前后,手臂之间的 PAM 分数没有显著差异(-4.41 个百分点;p = 0.58)。ITT 结果相似。在 ITT 或 TOT 分析中,我们没有发现治疗效果因种族而异的证据。

结论和相关性

纳入 PCD 增强了患者与提供者沟通的重要方面,但没有影响患者的积极性。结果不因种族而异。

试验注册

Clincaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT03766841。

相似文献

1
Impact of Pre-visit Contextual Data Collection on Patient-Physician Communication and Patient Activation: a Randomized Trial.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3321-3329. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06583-7. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
6

引用本文的文献

1
"Just Treat Me Delicately": A Qualitative Exploration of What Works to Engage Australian Men in Health Care Encounters.
Am J Mens Health. 2025 Mar-Apr;19(2):15579883241311557. doi: 10.1177/15579883241311557. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
5
User Requirements for Comanaged Digital Health and Care: Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 10;24(6):e35337. doi: 10.2196/35337.
6
Patient coaching: What do patients want? A mixed methods study in waiting rooms of outpatient clinics.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269677. eCollection 2022.
8
In Reply Letter to Editor.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):2092. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07479-4. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
9
The Potential of Pre-visit Patient Information.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):2091. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07478-5. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

3
Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):957-962. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067.
4
Informatics can help providers incorporate context into care.
JAMIA Open. 2018 Jun 22;1(1):3-6. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy025. eCollection 2018 Jul.
5
Health Care Hotspotting - A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 9;382(2):152-162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1906848.
10
Leveraging Advances in Technology to Promote Health Equity.
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2:S101-S103. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001112.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验