Estiri Hossein, Patel Chirag J, Murphy Shawn N
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Laboratory of Computer Science, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
JAMIA Open. 2018 Jun 22;1(1):3-6. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy025. eCollection 2018 Jul.
Most determinants of health originate from the "contexts" in which we live, which has remained outside the confines of the U.S. healthcare system. This issue has left providers unprepared to operate with an ample understanding of the challenges patients may face beyond their purview. The recent shift to value-based care and increasing prevalence of Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems provide opportunities to incorporate upstream contextual factors into care. We discuss that incorporating context into care is hindered by a chicken-and-egg dilemma - ie, lack of evidence on the utility of contextual data at the point of care, where contextual data are missing due to the lack of an informatics infrastructure. We argue that if we build the informatics infrastructure today, EHRs can give the tomorrow's clinicians the tools and the data they need to transform the U.S. healthcare from episodic and reactive to preventive and proactive. We also discuss system design considerations to improve efficacy of the suggested informatics infrastructure, which include systematically prioritizing contextual data domains, developing interoperability standards, and ensuring that integration of contextual data does not disrupt clinicians' workflow.
大多数健康决定因素源自我们所处的“环境”,而这一直处于美国医疗体系的范畴之外。这个问题使得医疗服务提供者在充分理解患者可能面临的超出其职责范围的挑战方面毫无准备。近期向基于价值的医疗的转变以及电子健康记录(EHR)系统的日益普及,为将上游环境因素纳入医疗服务提供了机会。我们讨论了将环境因素纳入医疗服务受到了一个先有鸡还是先有蛋的困境的阻碍——也就是说,在医疗服务点缺乏关于环境数据效用的证据,而由于缺乏信息学基础设施,环境数据也缺失。我们认为,如果我们现在构建信息学基础设施,电子健康记录可以为未来的临床医生提供他们所需的工具和数据,以便将美国医疗从 episodic 和 reactive 转变为预防性和主动性的。我们还讨论了系统设计方面的考虑因素,以提高所建议的信息学基础设施的效能,这些考虑因素包括系统地对环境数据领域进行优先级排序、制定互操作性标准,以及确保环境数据的整合不会扰乱临床医生的工作流程。 (注:原文中“episodic and reactive”及“preventive and proactive”较难准确对应中文,这里采取了直译加解释的方式,可根据实际情况优化表述)