Departments of Pediatrics, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pediatrics, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Dec;55(12):3279-3286. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25085. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
To determine the response of airway mechanics and the changes in asthma symptoms to stepping down of leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) therapy.
Thirty children (mean age: 7.1 years) with mild, well-controlled, and persistent asthma who took LTRA as maintenance treatment were randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Each group received an LTRA (montelukast) or placebo daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout period, and then the alternate treatment for 2 weeks. Spirometry and impulse oscillation system (IOS) measurements before and after four puffs of salbutamol inhalation, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and the childhood asthma control test (C-ACT) were evaluated at baseline, the end of placebo treatment, and the end of LTRA treatment.
Changes of FEV /FVC (p = .113) and FEV (p = .109) from baseline to posttreatment did not differ significantly between the placebo and montelukast groups. In the placebo group, prebronchodilator (pre-) FEV /FVC was decreased (83% vs. 86%) and bronchodilator response (BDR) in FEV was diminished (10.7% vs. 6.4%) at posttreatment compared with baseline. However, the montelukast group had no significant changes in pre-FEV /FVC (p = .865) and BDR in FEV (p = .461). In addition, compared with the montelukast group, the placebo group showed no significant changes in Rrs5 (total airway resistance), Rrs5-20 (peripheral airway resistance), FeNO, and symptoms by the C-ACT.
In children with well-controlled mild persistent asthma, changes in spirometry, IOS, FeNO, and C-ACT results did not differ between the placebo and montelukast groups within 2 weeks.
确定气道力学的反应和哮喘症状变化对白三烯受体拮抗剂(LTRA)治疗的影响。
30 名(平均年龄:7.1 岁)轻度、控制良好且持续的哮喘儿童接受 LTRA 作为维持治疗,他们被随机分为双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。每组每天接受 LTRA(孟鲁司特)或安慰剂治疗 2 周,随后进行 1 周洗脱期,然后交替治疗 2 周。在基线、安慰剂治疗结束和 LTRA 治疗结束时,评估四次沙丁胺醇吸入前后的肺活量测定和脉冲振荡系统(IOS)测量、呼出气一氧化氮分数(FeNO)和儿童哮喘控制测试(C-ACT)。
安慰剂和孟鲁司特组之间,从基线到治疗后的 FEV/FVC(p=0.113)和 FEV(p=0.109)变化无显著差异。在安慰剂组中,与基线相比,支气管扩张剂前(预)FEV/FVC 降低(83%比 86%),FEV 支气管扩张剂反应(BDR)减弱(10.7%比 6.4%)。然而,孟鲁司特组在 FEV/FVC 预(p=0.865)和 FEV BDR(p=0.461)方面无显著变化。此外,与孟鲁司特组相比,安慰剂组在 Rrs5(总气道阻力)、Rrs5-20(外周气道阻力)、FeNO 和 C-ACT 症状方面无显著变化。
在控制良好的轻度持续性哮喘儿童中,2 周内安慰剂和孟鲁司特组之间,肺活量测定、IOS、FeNO 和 C-ACT 结果的变化无差异。