• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能手机相机和平板扫描仪图像在咀嚼功能分析评估中的比较。

Comparison of smartphone-camera and conventional flatbed scanner images for analytical evaluation of chewing function.

机构信息

Clinic of General, Special Care, and Geriatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Dec;47(12):1496-1502. doi: 10.1111/joor.13094. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1111/joor.13094
PMID:32966643
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The two-colour mixing test is a quick method to assess chewing function (CF). The use of smartphone cameras for acquiring images may help in further simplifying the process.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the reliability of smartphone-camera images of chewing gums to assess CF.

METHODS

Five test samples of a bicoloured chewing gum were produced by a single fully dentate adult volunteer. The specimens were flattened to 1-mm thick wafers. The two sides of the wafers were digitised with a conventional flatbed scanner (control) and were photographed 20 times using 8 different smartphones. The images were assessed optoelectronically to obtain the variance of hue (VoH) and subjectively by visual assessment (SA) using a categorical scale (SA1-SA5). Spearman's correlation and regression models were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The intra-group variability for SA1-SA3 was <1% for all smartphones, but significantly higher than controls for SA4 and SA5 (smartphone: SA4 = 5.57%; SA5 = 8.76%; control: SA4 = 2.5%; SA5 = 0.79%). VoH was progressively lower from SA1 to SA5 for all imaging devices (r > -.97; P < .001). VoH comparisons between control and smartphone images revealed significant differences for the individual SA categories, and however, the magnitude of differences was small and non-significant when the full range of SA levels were considered. The linear mixed model regression showed significant effects for all the smartphones (P < .001) and SA levels (P < .001) in relation to the flatbed scanner values.

CONCLUSIONS

Smartphone cameras may be used to evaluate colour mixture for a bolus-kneading test, however, the precision is lower with higher degrees of colour mixing.

摘要

背景

双色混合测试是一种快速评估咀嚼功能(CF)的方法。使用智能手机摄像头获取图像可能有助于进一步简化该过程。

目的

本研究评估了智能手机摄像头拍摄的咀嚼胶图像评估 CF 的可靠性。

方法

由一名全牙列成年人志愿者制作了五个双色咀嚼胶测试样本。将样本压平至 1 毫米厚的薄片。使用传统的平板扫描仪(对照)对薄片的两面进行数字化,并使用 8 种不同的智能手机拍摄 20 次照片。使用光电方法评估图像以获得色调方差(VoH),并使用分类量表(SA1-SA5)进行主观评估(SA)。使用 Spearman 相关和回归模型进行统计分析。

结果

所有智能手机的 SA1-SA3 的组内变异性均<1%,但 SA4 和 SA5 的变异性明显高于对照组(智能手机:SA4=5.57%;SA5=8.76%;对照组:SA4=2.5%;SA5=0.79%)。对于所有成像设备,VoH 从 SA1 到 SA5 逐渐降低(r>.97;P<.001)。在考虑到所有 SA 水平时,与对照组相比,智能手机图像的 VoH 比较在个体 SA 类别之间存在显著差异,但差异幅度较小且无统计学意义。线性混合模型回归显示,所有智能手机(P<.001)和 SA 水平(P<.001)与平板扫描仪值相关均具有显著影响。

结论

智能手机摄像头可用于评估团块揉捏试验的颜色混合,但颜色混合程度越高,精度越低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of smartphone-camera and conventional flatbed scanner images for analytical evaluation of chewing function.智能手机相机和平板扫描仪图像在咀嚼功能分析评估中的比较。
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Dec;47(12):1496-1502. doi: 10.1111/joor.13094. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
2
Assessing masticatory performance with a colour-mixing ability test using smartphone camera images.使用智能手机摄像头图像的混色能力测试评估咀嚼性能。
J Oral Rehabil. 2022 Oct;49(10):961-969. doi: 10.1111/joor.13352. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Validation of a purpose-built chewing gum and smartphone application to evaluate chewing efficiency.一款专门设计的口香糖及智能手机应用程序用于评估咀嚼效率的验证。
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Nov;45(11):845-853. doi: 10.1111/joor.12696. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
4
Assessment of masticatory performance by geometric measurement of the mixing ability with 2-color chewing gum.用双色口香糖的混合能力的几何测量评估咀嚼性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jun;121(6):916-921. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.005. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
5
Reliability of a two-colour chewing gum test to assess masticatory performance in complete denture wearers.用于评估全口义齿佩戴者咀嚼性能的双色口香糖测试的可靠性。
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Apr;45(4):301-307. doi: 10.1111/joor.12609. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
6
Two-colour chewing gum mixing ability test for evaluating masticatory performance in children with mixed dentition: validity and reliability study.双色口香糖混合能力测试评估混合牙列期儿童咀嚼功能:效度与信度研究
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Nov;44(11):827-834. doi: 10.1111/joor.12548. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
7
A novel colourimetric technique to assess chewing function using two-coloured specimens: Validation and application.一种使用双色样本评估咀嚼功能的新型比色技术:验证与应用。
J Dent. 2015 Aug;43(8):955-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
8
Accuracy of newly developed color determination application for masticatory performance: Evaluating color-changeable chewing gum.新型咀嚼性能颜色测定应用程序的准确性:变色口香糖的评估。
J Prosthodont Res. 2024 Oct 16;68(4):650-657. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00140. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
9
A two-colour chewing gum test for masticatory efficiency: development of different assessment methods.一种用于咀嚼效率的双色口香糖测试:不同评估方法的开发
J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Sep;34(9):671-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01773.x.
10
Oral bolus kneading and shaping measured with chewing gum.用口香糖测量口腔推注揉捏和塑形。
Dysphagia. 1995 Spring;10(2):101-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00440079.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing masticatory performance with a colour-mixing ability test using smartphone camera images.使用智能手机摄像头图像的混色能力测试评估咀嚼性能。
J Oral Rehabil. 2022 Oct;49(10):961-969. doi: 10.1111/joor.13352. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
The Effect of a Masticatory Muscle Training Program on Chewing Efficiency and Bite Force in People with Dementia.咀嚼肌训练计划对痴呆症患者咀嚼效率和咬合力的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 22;19(7):3778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073778.
3
Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment.
咀嚼评估术语和方法的共识。
J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Jun;48(6):745-761. doi: 10.1111/joor.13161. Epub 2021 Mar 29.