Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Research & Development, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 15;203(6):689-698. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202005-1854OC.
Whether pharmacological therapy alters decline in FEV in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remains controversial. Because pharmacotherapy improves health status, exacerbation rate, and symptoms, it may be unethical to complete placebo-controlled long-term studies aimed at modifying FEV decline. We conducted a systematic review of placebo-controlled pharmacological trials lasting ≥1 year to address the question of whether therapy alters FEV decline. A literature search for randomized trials that included repeated spirometry with at least one active and one placebo arm was conducted. Articles were excluded if study duration was <1 year, <3 spirometric measurements, or <100 subjects per arm. Study design was assessed using the Jadad score. To combine studies and find the estimated effect, we used random effects methodology to account for both within-study and between-study variation. There were 33,051 patients in the analysis (active component, = 21,941; placebo, = 11,110 in nine studies). The active treatment arms demonstrated a 5.0 ml/yr reduction (95% confidence interval, 0.8-9.1 ml/yr; < 0.001) in the rate of FEV decline compared with the placebo arms. The relative FEV differences between active and placebo arms were within the range of differences reported for health status and for the exacerbation rate in the same studies. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pharmacotherapy ameliorates rate of lung function decline. The relative benefit observed is within the range of those reported for health status and exacerbations in the same studies. Guidelines should be adjusted according to these findings.
药物治疗是否会改变慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的 FEV 下降仍存在争议。由于药物治疗可改善健康状况、加重率和症状,因此进行旨在改变 FEV 下降的安慰剂对照长期研究可能是不道德的。我们对持续时间≥1 年的安慰剂对照药物治疗试验进行了系统评价,以解决治疗是否改变 FEV 下降的问题。我们对包括至少一次主动治疗和一次安慰剂治疗的重复肺活量测定的随机试验进行了文献检索。如果研究持续时间<1 年、<3 次肺活量测量或每个臂<100 例,则排除研究。使用 Jadad 评分评估研究设计。为了合并研究并找到估计的效果,我们使用随机效应方法来解释研究内和研究间的变异性。共有 33051 例患者(主动治疗组,n=21941;安慰剂组,n=9 项研究中的 11110 例)纳入分析。与安慰剂组相比,主动治疗组的 FEV 下降率降低了 5.0 ml/yr(95%置信区间,0.8-9.1 ml/yr;P<0.001)。主动治疗组和安慰剂组之间的 FEV 差异在同一研究中报告的健康状况和加重率的差异范围内。在 COPD 中,药物治疗可改善肺功能下降的速度。观察到的相对益处与同一研究中报告的健康状况和加重事件的益处范围一致。应根据这些发现调整指南。