• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性卒中患者谵妄的识别与应对:临床团队成员的理解

Identifying and Responding to Delirium in Acute Stroke: Clinical Team Members' Understandings.

作者信息

Carin-Levy Gail, Nicol Kath, van Wijck Frederike, Mead Gillian, McVittie Chris

机构信息

Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Musselburgh, United Kingdom.

Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2021 Jan;31(1):137-147. doi: 10.1177/1049732320959295. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1177/1049732320959295
PMID:32969764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7750676/
Abstract

Delirium is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. In the acute stroke setting, delirium identification is challenging due to the complexity of cognitive screening in this patient group. The aim of this study was to explore how members of interprofessional stroke-unit teams identified and responded to a potential delirium in a patient. Online focus groups and interviews utilizing case vignettes were conducted with 15 participants: nurses, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, and physiotherapists working in acute stroke services. Participants' understandings of delirium varied, most participants did not identify the symptoms of a possible hypoactive delirium, and nearly all participants discussed delirium symptoms in tentative terms. Aspects of interprofessional working were discussed through the expression of distinct roles around delirium identification. Although participants demonstrated an ethos of person-focused care, there are ongoing challenges involved in early identification and management of delirium in stroke survivors.

摘要

谵妄与死亡率、发病率的增加以及住院时间的延长有关。在急性中风的情况下,由于该患者群体认知筛查的复杂性,谵妄的识别具有挑战性。本研究的目的是探讨跨专业中风单元团队的成员如何识别并应对患者潜在的谵妄。对15名参与者进行了在线焦点小组讨论和利用病例 vignettes 的访谈,这些参与者包括在急性中风服务部门工作的护士、职业治疗师、言语和语言治疗师以及物理治疗师。参与者对谵妄的理解各不相同,大多数参与者没有识别出可能的安静型谵妄的症状,几乎所有参与者都以试探性的方式讨论了谵妄症状。通过围绕谵妄识别表达不同的角色,讨论了跨专业工作的各个方面。尽管参与者表现出以人为本的护理理念,但中风幸存者谵妄的早期识别和管理仍存在持续挑战。

相似文献

1
Identifying and Responding to Delirium in Acute Stroke: Clinical Team Members' Understandings.急性卒中患者谵妄的识别与应对:临床团队成员的理解
Qual Health Res. 2021 Jan;31(1):137-147. doi: 10.1177/1049732320959295. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
2
Identifying the barriers and enablers to palliative care nurses' recognition and assessment of delirium symptoms: a qualitative study.识别姑息治疗护士识别和评估谵妄症状的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Nov;48(5):815-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
3
Understanding nursing on an acute stroke unit: perceptions of space, time and interprofessional practice.理解急性卒中单元中的护理工作:对空间、时间和跨专业实践的认知
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Sep;65(9):1872-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05053.x.
4
Feasibility testing of an interprofessional education intervention to support collaborative practice in home care for older stroke survivors with multiple chronic conditions.多慢性病老年卒中幸存者居家照护中以支持协作实践为目标的跨专业教育干预措施的可行性测试。
J Interprof Care. 2024 Jan 2;38(1):121-132. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2023.2262511. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
Post-stroke delirium risk factors, signs and symptoms of onset and outcomes as perceived by expert nurses: A focus group study.专家护士所认知的中风后谵妄的危险因素、发作的体征和症状及预后:一项焦点小组研究。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Sep;29(9):105013. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105013. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
Challenges in building interpersonal care in organized hospital stroke units: The perspectives of stroke survivors, family caregivers and the multidisciplinary team.在有组织的医院卒中单元中建立人际关怀的挑战:卒中幸存者、家庭照顾者和多学科团队的观点。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Oct;73(10):2351-2360. doi: 10.1111/jan.13313. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Post-stroke delirium and challenges for the rehabilitation setting: A narrative review.中风后谵妄及康复环境面临的挑战:一项叙述性综述
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023 Aug;32(8):107149. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107149. Epub 2023 May 26.
8
Adaptation, implementation, and mixed methods evaluation of an interprofessional modular clinical practice guideline for delirium management on an inpatient palliative care unit.改编、实施和混合方法评估一种跨专业模块化临床实践指南,用于在住院姑息治疗病房管理谵妄。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 16;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01010-6.
9
Intensive Care Unit Nurses' Beliefs About Delirium Assessment and Management.重症监护病房护士对谵妄评估与管理的看法
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2016 Oct;27(4):379-393. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2016535.
10
Qualitative descriptive study to explore nurses' perceptions and experience on pain, agitation and delirium management in a community intensive care unit.一项探索社区重症监护病房护士对疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理的看法和经验的定性描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 4;9(4):e024328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024328.

引用本文的文献

1
Delirium education priorities for healthcare professional students: a modified Delphi study.面向医护专业学生的谵妄教育重点:一项改良德尔菲研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):1126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07667-w.
2
Evaluating the impact of Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index on in-hospital complications in patients with femoral fracture: a retrospective cohort analysis from the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database.评估年龄调整后的查尔森合并症指数对股骨骨折患者住院并发症的影响:一项来自MIMIC-IV 2.2数据库的回顾性队列分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 27;12:1606744. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1606744. eCollection 2025.
3
Challenges of the Implementation of a Delirium Rate Scale in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Approach.儿科重症监护病房实施谵妄率量表的挑战:一种定性研究方法
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 26;12(1):52. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010052.
4
Investigating nurses' knowledge and attitudes about delirium in older persons: a cross-sectional study.调查护士对老年人谵妄的认知与态度:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jan 11;22(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01158-9.
5
"Patient Comfort Can Be Sacrificed for Patient Safety"-Perception and Practice Reported by Critical Care Nurses Toward Physical Restraints: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.“为了患者安全可牺牲患者舒适度”——重症护理护士对身体约束的认知与实践报告:一项定性描述性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 23;8:573601. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.573601. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Maintenance of Professional Boundaries and Family Involvement in Residential Aged Care.维护专业界限和家庭参与养老院护理。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Sep;29(11):1611-1622. doi: 10.1177/1049732319839363. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
2
Engaging Without Exposing: Use of a Fictional Character to Facilitate Mental Health Talk in Focus Groups With Men Who Have Been Subject to the Criminal Justice System.参与而不暴露:在有过刑事司法系统经历的男性焦点小组中使用虚构角色促进心理健康对话。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Nov;28(13):2102-2114. doi: 10.1177/1049732318785359. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
3
Using Online Meeting Software to Facilitate Geographically Dispersed Focus Groups for Health Workforce Research.利用在线会议软件为卫生人力研究中的地域分散焦点小组提供便利。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1621-1628. doi: 10.1177/1049732318782167. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
4
Delirium in the acute phase after stroke: comparison between methods of detection.中风急性期的谵妄:检测方法之间的比较。
Neurol Sci. 2017 Jun;38(6):1101-1104. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2832-x. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
5
The role of diagnosis in delirium.谵妄的诊断作用。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Oct;28(10):1579-86. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001095. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
6
Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.预防住院非重症监护病房患者谵妄的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 11;3(3):CD005563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005563.pub3.
7
In-Person Versus Online Focus Group Discussions: A Comparative Analysis of Data Quality.面对面与在线焦点小组讨论:数据质量的比较分析
Qual Health Res. 2016 May;26(6):741-9. doi: 10.1177/1049732316631510. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
8
Improving post-stroke recovery: the role of the multidisciplinary health care team.改善中风后恢复:多学科医疗团队的作用。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015 Sep 22;8:433-42. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S68764. eCollection 2015.
9
Delirium: Why Are Nurses Confused?谵妄:为何护士会感到困惑?
Medsurg Nurs. 2015 Jan-Feb;24(1):15-22.
10
Efficacy of Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Prevent and Treat Delirium in Older Patients: A Systematic Overview. The SENATOR project ONTOP Series.非药物干预措施预防和治疗老年患者谵妄的疗效:系统综述。参议员项目ONTOP系列。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0123090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123090. eCollection 2015.