Anderson Tara, Coffey Alice, McMahon James, Craig Stephanie, Barry Heather E, Graham Margaret, Murphy Jill, Brown Wilson Christine, Boland Pauline, Tuohy Dympna, Birch Matt, Tierney Audrey, Stark Patrick, McCurtin Arlene, Creighton Laura, Henderson Elizabeth, Cook Lana, Cunningham Emma, Curran Geoffrey M, Mitchell Gary
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):1126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07667-w.
Delirium is frequently unrecognised, and healthcare professionals lack knowledge and confidence in recognition and management of the condition. Increased delirium education within pre-registration healthcare profession curricula may help to address this. A modified Delphi approach was utilised to develop a set of education priorities associated with delirium education for healthcare profession students.
An initial list of 72 education priorities were identified from a literature review, stakeholder focus groups, and a review of available clinical guidelines. Priorities were grouped into eight domains 'assessment and diagnosis', 'aetiology and risk factors', 'pathophysiology', 'treatment of delirium', 'prevention', 'delirium and dementia', 'impact on people with delirium, informal caregivers and family' and 'health promotion and public education'. Academic experts and healthcare professionals were invited to rank each priority and each domain across two rounds. Round one consisted of a survey including the list of 72 potential education priorities which participants were asked to rank from one (not a priority) to five (essential priority). Items which did not reach consensus criteria following round one were re-distributed as round two of the survey and participants were asked to repeat this exercise for the shorter list of items. Additionally, in round two, participants were asked to rank the eight domains from most important to least important.
Eighty participants completed round one of the Delphi survey and 55 (68.75%) also completed round two. Following round one, 41 priorities were considered highly relevant and therefore met the criteria to be included in the final set of education priorities. An additional four items reached these criteria following round two and so the final set consists of 45 items. Priorities related to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment were consistently ranked highly whereas priorities related to pathophysiology and health promotion were consistently ranked lowest.
This Delphi study identified areas of education viewed as the highest priorities for healthcare profession students' delirium education, drawn from a range of academics and healthcare professionals. The final set may help to inform the development of delirium education reflecting these priorities.
谵妄常常未被识别,医疗保健专业人员在识别和处理该病症方面缺乏知识和信心。在预注册医疗保健专业课程中增加谵妄教育可能有助于解决这一问题。采用了改良的德尔菲法来制定一套与医疗保健专业学生谵妄教育相关的教育重点。
通过文献综述、利益相关者焦点小组以及对现有临床指南的审查,确定了72项教育重点的初始清单。这些重点被分为八个领域:“评估与诊断”、“病因与风险因素”、“病理生理学”、“谵妄的治疗”、“预防”、“谵妄与痴呆”、“对谵妄患者、非正式护理人员和家庭的影响”以及“健康促进与公众教育”。邀请学术专家和医疗保健专业人员在两轮中对每个重点和每个领域进行排名。第一轮包括一项调查,其中列出了72项潜在的教育重点,要求参与者从一(非重点)到五(基本重点)进行排名。第一轮后未达到共识标准的项目作为第二轮调查重新分发,要求参与者对较短的项目清单重复此项操作。此外,在第二轮中,要求参与者对八个领域从最重要到最不重要进行排名。
80名参与者完成了德尔菲调查的第一轮,55名(68.75%)也完成了第二轮。第一轮后,41项重点被认为高度相关,因此符合纳入最终教育重点集的标准。第二轮后又有4项达到这些标准,因此最终集包括45项。与预防、诊断和治疗相关的重点一直排名很高,而与病理生理学和健康促进相关的重点一直排名最低。
这项德尔菲研究确定了一系列学术人员和医疗保健专业人员认为对医疗保健专业学生谵妄教育最为重要的教育领域。最终集可能有助于为反映这些重点的谵妄教育发展提供参考。