Infante Maria Teresa, Pardini Matteo, Balestrino Maurizio, Finocchi Cinzia, Malfatto Laura, Bellelli Giuseppe, Mancardi Giovanni Luigi, Gandolfo Carlo, Serrati Carlo
Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Martino IST, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genova, Italy.
Department of Neurology, Opthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS San Martino IST, Largo Daneo 3, Genova, 16132, Italy.
Neurol Sci. 2017 Jun;38(6):1101-1104. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2832-x. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Delirium is an acute neuropsychiatric syndrome, very common in hospitalized people with medical and neurological conditions. The identification of delirium after stroke is not an easy task and validated psychometric instruments are needed to correctly identify it. We decided to verify if (1) formal training in DSM-V criteria is needed to correctly identify post-stroke delirium, (2) if the use of a brief psychometric instrument such as 4AT improves its identification, (3) the applicability of these scales in the stroke setting. In the first phase of this study we retrospectively studied 102 acute stroke patients in Stroke Units of San Martino Hospital (Genova, Italy) to evaluate delirium with clinical criteria, first by a neurologist without a formal training in DSM-V criteria and after training. Then, we enrolled 100 new acute stroke patients who underwent screening for delirium using 4AT scale and DSM-V criteria. In the first phase, DSM-V criteria training significantly increased the ability to capture delirium (5 vs. 15%). In the second phase, the 4AT was used for delirium screening revealing a 52% of cases of delirium, the same observed by the consensus diagnosis of two senior neurologists (that was 50%). In the second phase, the use of 4AT scale allowed to capture post-stroke delirium as well as the consensus diagnosis by two neurologists. The identification of post-stroke delirium is not an easy task and requires both formal training in DSM-V criteria as well as the application of brief scales, such as the 4AT.
谵妄是一种急性神经精神综合征,在患有内科和神经疾病的住院患者中非常常见。中风后谵妄的识别并非易事,需要经过验证的心理测量工具才能正确识别。我们决定验证:(1)正确识别中风后谵妄是否需要接受关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-V)标准的正规培训;(2)使用诸如4AT这样的简短心理测量工具是否能提高其识别率;(3)这些量表在中风情况下的适用性。在本研究的第一阶段,我们对意大利热那亚圣马蒂诺医院卒中单元的102例急性中风患者进行了回顾性研究,首先由一名未接受过DSM-V标准正规培训的神经科医生,然后是在其接受培训后,依据临床标准评估谵妄情况。接着,我们招募了100例新的急性中风患者,使用4AT量表和DSM-V标准对其进行谵妄筛查。在第一阶段,DSM-V标准培训显著提高了识别谵妄的能力(从5%提高到15%)。在第二阶段,使用4AT进行谵妄筛查,发现谵妄病例占52%,这与两位资深神经科医生的共识诊断结果相同(为50%)。在第二阶段,使用4AT量表能够识别中风后谵妄,与两位神经科医生的共识诊断效果相当。中风后谵妄的识别并非易事,既需要接受关于DSM-V标准的正规培训,也需要应用简短量表,如4AT。