Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Autism Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 24;22(9):e16752. doi: 10.2196/16752.
Ongoing research is necessary to better understand the causes of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the developmental outcomes for individuals diagnosed with ASD, and the efficacy of the interventions. However, it is often difficult to recruit sufficient numbers of participants for studies, and despite the prevalence of ASD (currently estimated to affect 1 in 54 children), little research has focused on how to efficiently recruit participants with ASD.
The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two different paid advertisements-social media and radio advertising-in recruiting participants for a study enrolling people with ASD and their family members by examining the number of participants enrolled, the cost per participant, and the geographic reach of each type of advertising.
We examined participant enrollment in a study following nonoverlapping paid advertisements on a popular FM radio station (aired in three cities across two states) and Facebook (six advertisements that ran in five cities across two states). The total paid investment in the radio campaign was $12,030 and that in the Facebook campaign was $2950. Following the advertising campaigns, 1391 participants in the study who were affiliated with the Houston, Texas, site received email invitations to participate in a brief survey about the ways in which they learned about the study (eg, social media, medical provider, website) and which of these were most influential in their decisions to participate; 374 (26.8%) of the participants completed this survey.
Social media advertising outperformed radio in all three parameters examined by enrolling more participants (338 vs 149), with a lower average cost per participant ($8.73 vs $80.74) and a wider geographic reach, based on a comparison of the number of zip codes within and outside of Texas for questionnaire respondents who rated social media as the most influential method of contact (n=367, χ=5.85, P=.02). Of the 374 survey participants, 139 (37.2%) reported that they had seen the study on social media prior to enrollment, while only 9 (2.4%) said they heard about it via radio.
Our findings suggest that advertising on social media can efficiently reach a large pool of potential participants with ASD, increasing the likelihood of meeting study enrollment goals. Researchers should consider allocating at least some portion of recruitment dollars to social media platforms as a means of quickly and inexpensively reaching out to their target populations, including for studies with in-person procedures.
为了更好地了解自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的病因、被诊断为 ASD 的个体的发展结果以及干预措施的效果,需要进行持续的研究。然而,通常很难为研究招募到足够数量的参与者,尽管 ASD 的患病率很高(目前估计每 54 名儿童中就有 1 名),但很少有研究关注如何有效地招募 ASD 患者作为参与者。
本研究旨在通过检查参与者人数、每位参与者的成本以及每种广告类型的地理覆盖范围,确定两种不同付费广告(社交媒体和广播广告)在招募 ASD 患者及其家属参加研究方面的效果,该研究招募了 ASD 患者及其家属。
我们通过检查在一个受欢迎的调频广播电台(在两个州的三个城市播出)和 Facebook 上播出的非重叠付费广告(六个广告在两个州的五个城市播出)后研究的参与者人数,来评估这两种付费广告的效果。广播广告活动的总投资为 12030 美元,而 Facebook 广告活动的投资为 2950 美元。在广告活动之后,德克萨斯州休斯顿站点的 1391 名参与研究的人员收到了一封电子邮件邀请,邀请他们参加一项关于他们了解研究方式(例如社交媒体、医疗服务提供者、网站)的简短调查,以及这些方式中哪些对他们参与研究的决定影响最大;其中 374 人(26.8%)完成了这项调查。
社交媒体广告在所有三个被检查的参数上都优于广播,招募了更多的参与者(338 名比 149 名),每位参与者的平均成本更低($8.73 比 $80.74),地理覆盖范围更广,这是基于对问卷调查受访者的邮政编码数量的比较,这些受访者将社交媒体评为最有影响力的联系方式(n=367,χ=5.85,P=.02)。在 374 名调查参与者中,有 139 名(37.2%)表示他们在入组前在社交媒体上看到过该研究,而只有 9 名(2.4%)表示他们通过广播听说过该研究。
我们的研究结果表明,在社交媒体上做广告可以有效地接触到大量潜在的 ASD 患者,增加满足研究入组目标的可能性。研究人员应该考虑将部分招募资金用于社交媒体平台,作为一种快速且廉价地与目标人群联系的方式,包括针对需要面对面程序的研究。