From the Department of Rehabilitation, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan, China (JL, YY, SC); and Department of Rehabilitation, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China (LL).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jun 1;100(6):584-591. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001598.
The aim of the study was to assess effects of prism adaptation on unilateral spatial neglect poststroke.
Searching databases and referring to randomized controlled trial until December 30, 2019. There were two reviewers who searched some key words such as unilateral spatial neglect and prism adaptation, and only randomized controlled trial was included. There were two evaluators who screened literature and data regarding research design, treatment plan, etc. Assessment tool recommended in Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 5.1.0 was adopted to assess the risks of bias of randomized controlled trial, and Revman 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Mean differences and 95% of confidence intervals were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed through I2 statistics.
Eight randomized controlled trials were included, involving 244 patients of which 130 in experimental group and 114 in control group. According to meta-analysis results, prism adaptation group scored significantly higher than control group in improving Behavioral Inattention Test (mean difference = 8.99, 95% confidence interval = 0.93 to 17.06, P = 0.03) and Star Cancellation Test (mean difference = 3.04, 95% confidence interval = 0.19 to 5.88, P = 0.04). However, there was no significant statistical difference in Catherine Bergego Scale between groups (mean difference = -0.30, 95% confidence interval = -1.83 to 1.23, P = 0.70). The long-term follow-up visits (over 1 mo) appeared no statistical difference in Behavioral Inattention Test scores between the patients of two groups (mean difference = 8.93, 95% confidence interval = -1.98 to 19.84, P = 0.1).
Prism adaptation can improve neglect symptoms of patients with unilateral spatial neglect after stroke temporarily.
本研究旨在评估棱镜适应对脑卒中后单侧空间忽略的影响。
检索数据库并参考随机对照试验,检索时间截至 2019 年 12 月 30 日。两位审查员搜索了单侧空间忽略和棱镜适应等关键词,并仅纳入随机对照试验。两位评估员筛选了关于研究设计、治疗方案等的文献和数据。采用 Cochrane 评价员手册 5.1.0 推荐的评估工具评估随机对照试验的偏倚风险,并采用 Revman 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。计算均数差值和 95%置信区间,并通过 I2 统计评估异质性。
纳入 8 项随机对照试验,共 244 例患者,其中实验组 130 例,对照组 114 例。荟萃分析结果显示,棱镜适应组在改善行为忽略测试(均数差值=8.99,95%置信区间=0.93 至 17.06,P=0.03)和星号消去测试(均数差值=3.04,95%置信区间=0.19 至 5.88,P=0.04)方面的评分显著高于对照组。然而,两组在 Catherine Bergego 量表上的评分无显著统计学差异(均数差值=-0.30,95%置信区间=-1.83 至 1.23,P=0.70)。在长期随访(超过 1 个月)中,两组患者在行为忽略测试评分上无统计学差异(均数差值=8.93,95%置信区间=-1.98 至 19.84,P=0.1)。
棱镜适应可暂时改善脑卒中后单侧空间忽略患者的忽略症状。