Naito Yumene, Koshino Yuta, Ota Hisaaki, Piano Marianne, Watanabe Akihiro, Inagaki Yuji, Tokikuni Yukina, Sawamura Daisuke
Department of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
J Rehabil Med. 2025 Mar 24;57:jrm42542. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.42542.
This work aimed to investigate the effects of prism adaptation on unilateral spatial neglect following right hemispheric stroke.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Patients with unilateral spatial neglect following right hemispheric stroke.
RCTs comparing prism adaptation with placebo therapy were systematically searched across 4 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library). Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by 2 independent reviewers.
A total of 7 RCTs, involving 227 participants, satisfied the eligibility criteria. The results showed significant short-term effects of prism adaptation on neglect outcomes (SMD: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.07 to 0.92], p = 0.02) but not on the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) (SMD: -0.38 [95% CI: -1.27 to 0.51], p = 0.40). Subgroup analyses revealed that larger prism angles (exceeding 10°) had greater prism adaptation effects on both neglect outcomes and CBS (SMD: 0.71 [95% CI: 0.30 to 1.12], p = 0.0007 and SMD: -0.77 [95% CI: -1.51 to -0.02], p = 0.04, respectively).
This study demonstrated that larger prism angle with greater than 10° was identified as a crucial factor in eliciting prism adaptation effects. These findings support the use of prism adaptation with angles exceeding 10° as a therapeutic approach for unilateral spatial neglect.
本研究旨在探讨棱镜适应对右半球卒中后单侧空间忽视的影响。
随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析。
右半球卒中后单侧空间忽视的患者。
在4个数据库(PubMed、科学网、护理学与健康领域数据库、Cochrane图书馆)中系统检索比较棱镜适应与安慰剂治疗的随机对照试验。由2名独立的评审员进行筛选、数据提取和质量评估。
共有7项随机对照试验,涉及227名参与者,符合纳入标准。结果显示,棱镜适应对忽视结局有显著的短期影响(标准化均数差:0.49 [95%可信区间:0.07至0.92],p = 0.02),但对凯瑟琳·贝热戈量表(CBS)无显著影响(标准化均数差:-0.38 [95%可信区间:-1.27至0.51],p = 0.40)。亚组分析显示,较大的棱镜角度(超过10°)对忽视结局和CBS均有更大的棱镜适应效果(标准化均数差分别为:0.71 [95%可信区间:0.30至1.12],p = 0.0007;标准化均数差:-0.77 [95%可信区间:-1.51至-0.02],p = 0.04)。
本研究表明,大于10°的较大棱镜角度是引发棱镜适应效果的关键因素。这些发现支持将角度超过10°的棱镜适应作为单侧空间忽视的一种治疗方法。