Suppr超能文献

儿童癌症幸存者成年后的表观遗传年龄加速与慢性健康状况。

Epigenetic Age Acceleration and Chronic Health Conditions Among Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 May 4;113(5):597-605. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa147.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mounting evidence supports the occurrence of accelerating aging among long-term survivors of childhood cancer. We aimed to investigate epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) in survivors and evaluate associations between EAA, treatment exposures, health behaviors, and chronic health conditions (CHCs).

METHODS

Genome-wide methylation data were generated with Infinium EPIC BeadChip on blood-derived DNA from 2139 survivors and 282 frequency matched controls from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. EAAs were estimated as residuals from a linear regression of epigenetic age (Levine's clock) against chronological age. Adjusted least square mean (ALSM) of EAA was calculated and compared between survivors and controls, across treatment exposures and health behaviors. Associations of EAA with 20 clinically assessed CHCs were evaluated with multivariable piecewise-exponential models. All statistical tests for P values below were 2-sided.

RESULTS

EAA was statistically significantly higher in survivors than controls (ALSM = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26 to 1.01 vs -3.61, 95% CI = -4.43 to 2.80). In a multivariable model among survivors, statistically significantly higher EAA (P < .05) was observed in those exposed to chest radiotherapy, abdomen or pelvic radiotherapy, alkylating agents, glucocorticoids, or epipodophyllotoxins. Compared with survivors with favorable health behaviors (ALSM = 0.26, 95% CI=-0.36 to 0.87), EAA was statistically significantly higher among survivors with intermediate (ALSM = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.59 to 1.54) or unfavorable health behaviors (ALSM = 1.45, 95% CI = 0.60 to 2.30). In time-to-event analyses, statistically significant associations were identified between EAA tertiles and incidence of 7 CHCs: hypertension (3rd vs 1st tertile, relative rate [RR] = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.83), myocardial infarction (RR = 2.91, 95% CI = 1.27 to 7.21), obesity (RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.66), obstructive pulmonary deficit (RR = 1.86, 95% CI = 0.95 to 3.77), peripheral motor neuropathy (RR = 2.89, 95% CI = 1.24 to 6.97), peripheral sensory neuropathy (RR = 2.04, 95% CI = 0.99 to 4.26), and pulmonary diffusion deficits (RR = 2.75, 95% CI = 0.95 to 7.63).

CONCLUSIONS

EAA is statistically significantly higher in survivors of childhood cancer than in noncancer controls and is associated with specific treatment exposures, unfavorable health behaviors, and presence of specific CHCs.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,儿童癌症长期幸存者的衰老速度在加快。我们旨在研究幸存者中的表观遗传年龄加速(EAA),并评估 EAA 与治疗暴露、健康行为和慢性健康状况(CHC)之间的关系。

方法

从圣裘德终身队列研究中的 2139 名幸存者和 282 名频率匹配的对照者的血液衍生 DNA 中生成了全基因组甲基化数据。通过对表观遗传年龄(Levine 时钟)与实际年龄进行线性回归来估计 EAAs。计算幸存者和对照者之间、治疗暴露和健康行为之间 EAA 的调整最小平方均值(ALSM),并进行比较。使用多变量分段指数模型评估 EAA 与 20 种临床评估的 CHC 的相关性。所有 P 值均为双侧检验。

结果

与对照组相比,幸存者的 EAA 明显更高(ALSM=0.63,95%置信区间[CI]:0.26 至 1.01 对-3.61,95%CI=-4.43 至 2.80)。在幸存者的多变量模型中,与接受胸部放疗、腹部或盆腔放疗、烷化剂、糖皮质激素或表鬼臼毒素治疗的幸存者相比,EAA 明显更高(P<0.05)。与健康行为良好的幸存者相比(ALSM=0.26,95%CI=-0.36 至 0.87),EAA 明显更高,幸存者的健康行为中等(ALSM=1.07,95%CI=0.59 至 1.54)或不良(ALSM=1.45,95%CI=0.60 至 2.30)。在时间事件分析中,EAA 三分位组与 7 种 CHC 的发病风险之间存在统计学显著关联:高血压(第 3 分位与第 1 分位相比,相对风险[RR]=1.83,95%CI=1.17 至 2.83)、心肌梗死(RR=2.91,95%CI=1.27 至 7.21)、肥胖(RR=1.39,95%CI=1.17 至 1.66)、阻塞性肺缺陷(RR=1.86,95%CI=0.95 至 3.77)、周围运动神经病(RR=2.89,95%CI=1.24 至 6.97)、周围感觉神经病(RR=2.04,95%CI=0.99 至 4.26)和肺扩散缺陷(RR=2.75,95%CI=0.95 至 7.63)。

结论

与非癌症对照者相比,儿童癌症幸存者的 EAA 明显更高,且与特定的治疗暴露、不良的健康行为以及特定的 CHC 有关。

相似文献

1
Epigenetic Age Acceleration and Chronic Health Conditions Among Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 May 4;113(5):597-605. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa147.
2
Race and Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Factors, and Epigenetic Age Acceleration in Survivors of Childhood Cancer.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2419771. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19771.
4
Epigenetic Age in Peripheral Blood Among Children, Adolescent, and Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e2310325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10325.
5
Deficit Accumulation Index and Biological Markers of Aging in Survivors of Childhood Cancer.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344015. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44015.
7
Health-related quality of life and DNA methylation-based aging biomarkers among survivors of childhood cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jul 1;116(7):1116-1125. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae046.
8
The cumulative burden of surviving childhood cancer: an initial report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE).
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2569-2582. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31610-0. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling the Genetic Associations with Epigenetic Age Acceleration in Childhood Cancer Survivors: Insights from GWAS Studies.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 Jun 1;26(6):1871-1872. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.6.1871.
2
Accelerated Aging in Cancer and Cancer Treatment: Current Status of Biomarkers.
Cancer Med. 2025 May;14(9):e70929. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70929.
5
Reevaluating Anti-Inflammatory Therapy: Targeting Senescence to Balance Anti-Cancer Efficacy and Vascular Disease.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2025 Mar;45(3):372-385. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.319870. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
6
Genetic and epigenetic bases of long-term adverse effects of childhood cancer therapy.
Nat Rev Cancer. 2025 Feb;25(2):129-144. doi: 10.1038/s41568-024-00768-6. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
7
Applicability of epigenetic age models to next-generation methylation arrays.
Genome Med. 2024 Oct 7;16(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01387-4.
8
Molecular signaling and clinical implications in the human aging-cancer cycle.
Semin Cancer Biol. 2024 Nov;106-107:28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
9
Sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages in relation to premature aging in adult survivors of childhood cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2024 Oct;131(7):1169-1177. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02815-3. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Telomere Attrition in Childhood Cancer Survivors.
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 May 15;26(10):2281-2283. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0380. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
4
Education and Lifestyle Factors Are Associated with DNA Methylation Clocks in Older African Americans.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 28;16(17):3141. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173141.
5
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.
JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):2020-2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854.
6
Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty.
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018 Sep;15(9):505-522. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0064-2.
7
Genetic Risk for Subsequent Neoplasms Among Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2078-2087. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8589. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan.
Aging (Albany NY). 2018 Apr 18;10(4):573-591. doi: 10.18632/aging.101414.
9
DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing.
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Jun;19(6):371-384. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3.
10
The cumulative burden of surviving childhood cancer: an initial report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE).
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2569-2582. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31610-0. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验