Suppr超能文献

创伤后应激障碍中的反刍思维:一项系统综述。

Rumination in posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review.

作者信息

Moulds Michelle L, Bisby Madelyne A, Wild Jennifer, Bryant Richard A

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101910. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101910. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

Abstract

Initial models and empirical investigations of rumination in the clinical literature were predominantly in the domain of depression. However, rumination is now well-established as a transdiagnostic cognitive process, including in the context of posttraumatic stress. To clarify the current understanding of rumination in posttraumatic stress, we conducted a systematic review of the empirical literature on rumination in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Six sub-groups of studies on this topic were identified; these addressed: (i) the frequency and nature of rumination, (ii) cross-sectional relationships between rumination and PTSD symptoms, (iii) the capacity of rumination to predict PTSD longitudinally, (iv) other processes associated with rumination, (v) neurobiological correlates of rumination, and (vi) whether treating PTSD reduces rumination. This review synthesizes these domains of research and identifies key methodological limitations which limit causal inferences, and points to important areas of future research to advance knowledge on rumination in PTSD.

摘要

临床文献中关于反刍思维的初始模型和实证研究主要集中在抑郁症领域。然而,现在反刍思维已被确认为一种跨诊断的认知过程,包括在创伤后应激的背景下。为了阐明目前对创伤后应激中反刍思维的理解,我们对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)中反刍思维的实证文献进行了系统综述。确定了关于该主题的六个研究子组;这些子组涉及:(i)反刍思维的频率和性质,(ii)反刍思维与PTSD症状之间的横断面关系,(iii)反刍思维纵向预测PTSD的能力,(iv)与反刍思维相关的其他过程,(v)反刍思维的神经生物学相关性,以及(vi)治疗PTSD是否会减少反刍思维。本综述综合了这些研究领域,确定了限制因果推断的关键方法学局限性,并指出了未来研究的重要领域,以推进对PTSD中反刍思维的认识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验