Suppr超能文献

人际和非人际创伤经历后的情绪识别与情绪敏感性:奥罗拉研究结果

Emotion identification and emotion sensitivity following interpersonal and non-interpersonal traumatic experiences: Results from the AURORA study.

作者信息

Hudson Chloe C, Rutter Lauren, Joormann Jutta, Passell Eliza, McKemey Rory M, House Stacey L, Beaudoin Francesca L, An Xinming, Stevens Jennifer S, Neylan Thomas C, Jovanovic Tanja, Linnstaedt Sarah D, Rauch Scott L, Haran John P, Storrow Alan B, Lewandowski Christopher, Musey Paul I, Hendry Phyllis L, Sheikh Sophia, Jones Christopher W, Punches Brittany E, Hudak Lauren A, Pascual Jose L, Seamon Mark J, Datner Elizabeth M, Pearson Claire, Peak David A, Merchant Roland C, Domeier Robert M, Rathlev Niels K, O'Neil Brian J, Sergot Paulina, Sanchez Leon D, Bruce Steven E, Harte Steven E, Kessler Ronald C, Koenen Karestan C, McLean Samuel A, Germine Laura T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.

Behavioral Health Partial Hospital Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1177/21677026251356428.

Abstract

Social cognition is an important mechanism linking trauma to psychopathology; however, current models fail to explain individual differences in social cognition after trauma exposure. We investigated whether the interpersonal nature of trauma exposure helps to explain variability in social cognitive outcomes. Our sample was derived from the AURORA study, a national initiative involving intensive follow-up of trauma survivors for one year. We analyzed data from 2241 participants (M = 35.12, 64% female, 54% Black) who experienced an assault ( = 262) or a motor vehicle collision ( = 1979). Social cognition was assessed with the Multiracial Emotion Identification Task and the Belmont Emotion Sensitivity Test. Overall emotion identification accuracy declined over time among participants who experienced interpersonal trauma (β = -.10, = .03), but not non-interpersonal trauma (β = .00, = .83). These results may help to enhance the prediction of psychopathological outcomes following trauma exposure.

摘要

社会认知是一种将创伤与精神病理学联系起来的重要机制;然而,当前的模型未能解释创伤暴露后社会认知的个体差异。我们调查了创伤暴露的人际性质是否有助于解释社会认知结果的变异性。我们的样本来自奥罗拉研究,这是一项全国性倡议,对创伤幸存者进行为期一年的密集随访。我们分析了2241名参与者(M = 35.12,64%为女性,54%为黑人)的数据,他们经历了袭击(n = 262)或机动车碰撞(n = 1979)。社会认知通过多种族情绪识别任务和贝尔蒙特情绪敏感性测试进行评估。在经历人际创伤的参与者中,总体情绪识别准确性随时间下降(β = -.10,p = .03),但非人际创伤参与者则不然(β = .00,p = .83)。这些结果可能有助于提高对创伤暴露后精神病理结果的预测。

相似文献

8
Psychological therapies for children and adolescents exposed to trauma.针对遭受创伤的儿童和青少年的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 11;10(10):CD012371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012371.
9
Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence.针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD013017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
How theory of mind leads to positive first impressions.心理理论如何产生积极的第一印象。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jun;153(6):1489-1499. doi: 10.1037/xge0001573. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验