Tampo Mayou Martin T, Onglao Mark Augustine S, Lopez Marc Paul J, Sacdalan Marie Dione P, Cruz Ma Concepcion L, Apellido Rosielyn T, Monroy Iii Hermogenes J
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Department of Anesthesiology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Ann Coloproctol. 2022 Apr;38(2):109-116. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.02. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
This study aims to evaluate surgical outcomes (i.e. length of stay [LOS], 30-day morbidity, mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates) with the use of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway, and determine its association with the rate of compliance to the different ERAS components.
This was a prospective cohort of patients, who underwent the following elective procedures: stoma reversal (SR), colon resection (CR), and rectal resection (RR). The primary endpoint was to determine the association of compliance to an ERAS pathway and surgical outcomes. These were then retrospectively compared to outcomes prior to the implementation of ERAS.
A total of 267 patients were included in the study. The overall compliance to the ERAS component was 92.0% (SR, 91.8%; CR, 93.1%; RR, 90.7%). There was an associated decrease in morbidity rates across all types of surgery, as compliance to ERAS increased. The average total LOS decreased in all groups but was only found to have statistical significance in SR (12.1±6.7 days vs. 10.0±5.4 days, P=0.002) and RR (19.9±11.4 days vs. 16.9±10.5 days, P=0.04) groups. Decreased postoperative LOS was noted in all groups. Morbidity rates were significantly higher after ERAS implementation, but reoperation and mortality rates were found to be similar.
Increased compliance to ERAS protocol is associated with a decrease in morbidity across all surgery types. The implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly decreased mean hospital LOS, without any increase in major surgical complications. Having your own hospital ERAS pathway improves documentation and accuracy of reporting surgical complications.
本研究旨在评估采用加速康复外科(ERAS)路径的手术结局(即住院时间[LOS]、30天发病率、死亡率、再次手术率和再入院率),并确定其与不同ERAS组成部分的依从率之间的关联。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入接受以下择期手术的患者:造口回纳术(SR)、结肠切除术(CR)和直肠切除术(RR)。主要终点是确定ERAS路径的依从性与手术结局之间的关联。然后将这些结果与ERAS实施前的结局进行回顾性比较。
本研究共纳入267例患者。ERAS组成部分的总体依从率为92.0%(SR为91.8%;CR为93.1%;RR为90.7%)。随着对ERAS依从性的增加,所有类型手术的发病率均有所下降。所有组的平均总住院时间均有所减少,但仅在SR组(12.1±6.7天对10.0±5.4天,P=0.002)和RR组(19.9±11.4天对16.9±10.5天,P=0.04)中具有统计学意义。所有组的术后住院时间均有所缩短。ERAS实施后的发病率显著更高,但再次手术率和死亡率相似。
对ERAS方案依从性的提高与所有手术类型发病率的降低相关。ERAS方案的实施显著缩短了平均住院时间,且未增加主要手术并发症。拥有自己医院的ERAS路径可改善手术并发症记录和报告的准确性。