• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较颈动脉超声和弗雷明汉风险评分在鉴别银屑病关节炎患者冠状动脉疾病中的应用。

Comparison of carotid artery ultrasound and Framingham risk score for discriminating coronary artery disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

机构信息

Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong.

出版信息

RMD Open. 2020 Sep;6(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001364.

DOI:10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001364
PMID:32973102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7539857/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the performance of carotid ultrasound (US) parameters alone or in combination with Framingham Risk Score (FRS) in discriminating patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with and without coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Ninety-one patients with PsA (56 males; age: 50±11 years, disease duration: 9.4±9.2 years) without overt cardiovascular (CV) diseases were recruited. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), the presence of plaque and total plaque area (TPA) was determined by high-resolution US. CAD was defined as the presence of any coronary plaque on coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Obstructive-CAD (O-CAD) was defined as >50% stenosis of the lumen.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (38%) patients had carotid plaque. Fifty-four (59%) patients had CAD (CAD+) and 9 (10%) patients had O-CAD (O-CAD+). No significant associations between the presence of carotid plaque and CAD were found. However, cIMT and TPA were higher in both the CAD+ and O-CAD+ group compared with the CAD- or O-CAD- groups, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that mean cIMT was an independent explanatory variable associated with CAD and O-CAD, while maximum cIMT and TPA were independent explanatory variables associated with O-CAD after adjusting for covariates. The optimal cut-offs for detecting the presence of CAD were FRS >5% and mean cIMT at 0.62 mm (AUC: 0.71; sensitivity: 67%; specificity: 76%), while the optimal cut-offs for detecting the presence of O-CAD were FRS >10% in combination with mean cIMT at 0.73 mm (AUC: 0.71; sensitivity: 56%; specificity: 85%).

CONCLUSION

US parameters including cIMT and TPA may be considered in addition to FRS for CV risk stratification in patients with PsA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估颈动脉超声(US)参数单独或与弗莱明汉风险评分(FRS)联合用于鉴别伴有或不伴有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者的性能。

方法

共招募了 91 例无明显心血管(CV)疾病的 PsA 患者(56 名男性;年龄:50±11 岁,病程:9.4±9.2 年)。通过高分辨率 US 确定颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)、斑块存在情况和总斑块面积(TPA)。CAD 定义为冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)上任何冠状动脉斑块的存在。阻塞性 CAD(O-CAD)定义为管腔狭窄>50%。

结果

35 例(38%)患者存在颈动脉斑块。54 例(59%)患者有 CAD(CAD+),9 例(10%)患者有 O-CAD(O-CAD+)。颈动脉斑块的存在与 CAD 之间无显著相关性。然而,与 CAD-或 O-CAD-组相比,CAD+和 O-CAD+组的 cIMT 和 TPA 均较高。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,平均 cIMT 是与 CAD 和 O-CAD 相关的独立解释变量,而最大 cIMT 和 TPA 是调整协变量后与 O-CAD 相关的独立解释变量。检测 CAD 存在的最佳截断值为 FRS>5%和平均 cIMT 为 0.62mm(AUC:0.71;灵敏度:67%;特异性:76%),检测 O-CAD 存在的最佳截断值为 FRS>10%联合平均 cIMT 为 0.73mm(AUC:0.71;灵敏度:56%;特异性:85%)。

结论

在 PsA 患者中,除了 FRS 外,还可以考虑 US 参数(包括 cIMT 和 TPA)进行 CV 风险分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f920/7539857/a0b986c7e6d2/rmdopen-2020-001364f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f920/7539857/a0b986c7e6d2/rmdopen-2020-001364f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f920/7539857/a0b986c7e6d2/rmdopen-2020-001364f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of carotid artery ultrasound and Framingham risk score for discriminating coronary artery disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis.比较颈动脉超声和弗雷明汉风险评分在鉴别银屑病关节炎患者冠状动脉疾病中的应用。
RMD Open. 2020 Sep;6(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001364.
2
Differential incremental value of ultrasound carotid intima-media thickness, carotid plaque, and cardiac calcium to predict angiographic coronary artery disease across Framingham risk score strata in the APRES multicentre study.在APRES多中心研究中,超声颈动脉内膜中层厚度、颈动脉斑块及心脏钙化在弗明汉风险评分各分层中预测血管造影冠状动脉疾病的差异增量价值。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Sep;17(9):991-1000. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev222. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
3
Value of Carotid Ultrasound in Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Patients With Psoriatic Disease.颈动脉超声在银屑病患者心血管风险分层中的价值。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;71(10):1651-1659. doi: 10.1002/art.40925. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
4
Cardiovascular risk reclassification according to six cardiovascular risk algorithms and carotid ultrasound in psoriatic arthritis patients.根据六种心血管风险算法和银屑病关节炎患者的颈动脉超声进行心血管风险重新分类
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 May;41(5):1413-1420. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-06002-0. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Usefulness of carotid plaque (sum and maximum of plaque thickness) in combination with intima-media thickness for the detection of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with diabetes.颈动脉斑块(斑块厚度总和和最大值)联合内中膜厚度在无症状糖尿病患者冠心病检测中的作用。
J Diabetes Investig. 2016 May;7(3):396-403. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12403. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
6
The Framingham Risk Score underestimates the extent of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with psoriatic disease.弗雷明汉风险评分低估了银屑病患者亚临床动脉粥样硬化的程度。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Nov;73(11):1990-6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203433. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
7
Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque occurrence in predicting stable angiographic coronary artery disease.颈动脉内膜中层厚度和斑块发生与稳定型冠状动脉疾病的预测。
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1283-8. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S49166. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
8
Role of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular risk prediction and outcomes: comparison of machine-learning and conventional statistical approaches for the analysis of carotid ultrasound features and intra-plaque neovascularization.人工智能在心血管风险预测和结局中的作用:分析颈动脉超声特征和斑块内新生血管的机器学习和传统统计学方法比较。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Nov;37(11):3145-3156. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02294-0. Epub 2021 May 29.
9
Carotid intimal thickness and plaque predict prevalence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis: a pilot study.颈动脉内膜厚度和斑块可预测冠状动脉粥样硬化的患病率及严重程度:一项初步研究。
Angiology. 2015 Jan;66(1):65-9. doi: 10.1177/0003319714522849. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
10
Underestimation of Risk of Carotid Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.银屑病关节炎患者心血管风险评分低估颈动脉亚临床动脉粥样硬化风险。
J Rheumatol. 2018 Feb;45(2):218-226. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170025. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The metabolic score for insulin resistance predicts the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from the 10-year prospective CARMA cohort.胰岛素抵抗代谢评分可预测银屑病关节炎患者的心血管疾病风险:来自为期10年的前瞻性CARMA队列研究的结果
RMD Open. 2025 Mar 7;11(1):e005352. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005352.
2
Endothelial dysfunction and risk factors for atherosclerosis in psoriatic arthritis: overview and comparison with rheumatoid arthritis.银屑病关节炎中血管内皮功能障碍与动脉粥样硬化的危险因素:概述及与类风湿关节炎的比较。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Sep;44(9):1587-1606. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05556-x. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasound Measurement of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Plaques in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease.颈动脉内-中膜厚度和斑块的超声测量在预测冠状动脉疾病中的应用。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1608-1613. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
Global perspective on carotid intima-media thickness and plaque: should the current measurement guidelines be revisited?关于颈动脉内膜中层厚度和斑块的全球视角:是否应重新审视当前的测量指南?
Int Angiol. 2019 Dec;38(6):451-465. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.19.04267-6. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
3
Value of Carotid Ultrasound in Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Patients With Psoriatic Disease.
PET/CT-Based Characterization of 18F-FDG Uptake in Various Tissues Reveals Novel Potential Contributions to Coronary Artery Disease in Psoriatic Arthritis.
基于 PET/CT 的 18F-FDG 摄取在各种组织中的特征分析揭示了其在银屑病关节炎相关冠状动脉疾病中的潜在新贡献。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 2;13:909760. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.909760. eCollection 2022.
4
Cardiovascular Risk in Myositis Patients Compared to the General Population: Preliminary Data From a Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.与普通人群相比,肌炎患者的心血管风险:一项单中心横断面研究的初步数据。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 3;9:861419. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.861419. eCollection 2022.
5
Comorbidities in rheumatic diseases need special consideration during the COVID-19 pandemic.风湿性疾病中的合并症在 COVID-19 大流行期间需要特别考虑。
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Feb;41(2):243-256. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04764-5. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
颈动脉超声在银屑病患者心血管风险分层中的价值。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;71(10):1651-1659. doi: 10.1002/art.40925. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
4
A Special Report on Changing Trends in Preventive Stroke/Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Via B-Mode Ultrasonography.经 B 型超声模式的预防性中风/心血管风险评估变化趋势的特别报告
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019 May 1;21(7):25. doi: 10.1007/s11883-019-0788-4.
5
Carotid plaque composition by CT angiography in asymptomatic subjects: a head-to-head comparison to ultrasound.CT 血管造影在无症状患者中颈动脉斑块成分分析:与超声的头对头比较。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):5920-5931. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06086-y. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
6
Rheumatoid Arthritis: Atherosclerosis Imaging and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Using Machine and Deep Learning-Based Tissue Characterization.类风湿关节炎:基于机器学习和深度学习的组织特征分析的动脉粥样硬化成像和心血管风险评估。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019 Jan 25;21(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11883-019-0766-x.
7
Dr. Tam, reply.谭医生,请回复。
J Rheumatol. 2018 Aug;45(9):1330-1332. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180439.
8
Modifications of Cardiovascular Risk Scores, But Not Standard Risk Scores, Improve Identification of Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease in Psoriatic Arthritis.心血管风险评分的修改而非标准风险评分,可改善银屑病关节炎中无症状冠状动脉疾病的识别。
J Rheumatol. 2018 Aug;45(9):1329-1330. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180299.
9
Effect of Achieving Minimal Disease Activity on the Progression of Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Arterial Stiffness: A Prospective Cohort Study in Psoriatic Arthritis.实现最小疾病活动度对银屑病关节炎患者亚临床动脉粥样硬化和动脉僵硬度进展的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;71(2):271-280. doi: 10.1002/art.40695. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
10
Higher Coronary Plaque Burden in Psoriatic Arthritis Is Independent of Metabolic Syndrome and Associated With Underlying Disease Severity.银屑病关节炎患者的冠状动脉斑块负担较高,与代谢综合征无关,与潜在疾病严重程度相关。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Mar;70(3):396-407. doi: 10.1002/art.40389. Epub 2018 Feb 6.