Saba Luca, Jamthikar Ankush, Gupta Deep, Khanna Narendra N, Viskovic Klaudija, Suri Harman S, Gupta Ajay, Mavrogeni Sophie, Turk Monika, Laird John R, Pareek Gyan, Miner Martin, Sfikakis Petros P, Protogerou Athanasios, Kitas George D, Viswanathan Vijay, Nicolaides Andrew, Bhatt Deepak L, Suri Jasjit S
Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India.
Int Angiol. 2019 Dec;38(6):451-465. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.19.04267-6. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque (CP) currently act as risk predictors for CVD/Stroke risk assessment. Over 2000 articles have been published that cover either use cIMT/CP or alterations of cIMT/CP and additional image-based phenotypes to associate cIMT related markers with CVD/Stroke risk. These articles have shown variable results, which likely reflect a lack of standardization in the tools for measurement, risk stratification, and risk assessment. Guidelines for cIMT/CP measurement are influenced by major factors like the atherosclerosis disease itself, conventional risk factors, 10-year measurement tools, types of CVD/Stroke risk calculators, incomplete validation of measurement tools, and the fast pace of computer technology advancements. This review discusses the following major points: 1) the American Society of Echocardiography and Mannheim guidelines for cIMT/CP measurements; 2) forces that influence the guidelines; and 3) calculators for risk stratification and assessment under the influence of advanced intelligence methods. The review also presents the knowledge-based learning strategies such as machine and deep learning which may play a future role in CVD/stroke risk assessment. We conclude that both machine learning and non-machine learning strategies will flourish for current and 10-year CVD/Stroke risk prediction as long as they integrate image-based phenotypes with conventional risk factors.
颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)和颈动脉斑块(CP)目前是心血管疾病(CVD)/中风风险评估的风险预测指标。已经发表了2000多篇文章,内容涉及使用cIMT/CP或cIMT/CP的变化以及其他基于图像的表型,将cIMT相关标志物与CVD/中风风险联系起来。这些文章显示出了不同的结果,这可能反映出在测量工具、风险分层和风险评估方面缺乏标准化。cIMT/CP测量指南受到多种主要因素的影响,如动脉粥样硬化疾病本身、传统风险因素、10年测量工具、CVD/中风风险计算器的类型、测量工具验证不完整以及计算机技术进步的快速步伐。本综述讨论以下要点:1)美国超声心动图学会和曼海姆cIMT/CP测量指南;2)影响指南的因素;3)在先进智能方法影响下的风险分层和评估计算器。该综述还介绍了基于知识的学习策略,如机器学习和深度学习,它们可能在未来的CVD/中风风险评估中发挥作用。我们得出结论,只要将基于图像的表型与传统风险因素相结合,机器学习和非机器学习策略在当前和未来10年的CVD/中风风险预测中都将蓬勃发展。
Postgrad Med. 2010-1
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024-6
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023-12-4