Cognition, Motion & Neuroscience, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy; Neural Computation Lab, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Cognition, Motion & Neuroscience, Center for Human Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy; Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Curr Biol. 2020 Dec 7;30(23):4594-4605.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.104. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
Although it is well established that fronto-parietal regions are active during action observation, whether they play a causal role in the ability to infer others' intentions from visual kinematics remains undetermined. In the experiments reported here, we combined offline continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) with computational modeling to reveal and causally probe single-trial computations in the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Participants received cTBS over the left anterior IPL and the left IFG pars orbitalis in separate sessions before completing an intention discrimination task (discriminate intention of observed reach-to-grasp acts) or a kinematic discrimination task unrelated to intention (discriminate peak wrist height of the same acts). We targeted intention-sensitive regions whose fMRI activity, recorded when observing the same reach-to-grasp acts, could accurately discriminate intention. We found that transient disruption of activity of the left IPL, but not the IFG, impaired the observer's ability to attribute intention to action. Kinematic discrimination unrelated to intention, in contrast, was largely unaffected. Computational analyses of how encoding (mapping of intention to movement kinematics) and readout (mapping of kinematics to intention choices) intersect at the single-trial level revealed that IPL cTBS did not diminish the overall sensitivity of intention readout to movement kinematics. Rather, it selectively misaligned intention readout with respect to encoding, deteriorating mapping from informative kinematic features to intention choices. These results provide causal evidence of how the left anterior IPL computes mapping from kinematics to intentions.
虽然前额顶叶区域在动作观察期间活跃是众所周知的,但它们是否在从视觉运动学推断他人意图的能力中起因果作用仍未确定。在本报告的实验中,我们结合离线连续 theta 爆发刺激(cTBS)和计算建模,揭示并因果探测下顶叶(IPL)和下额前回(IFG)的单次试验计算。参与者在完成意图辨别任务(辨别观察到的伸手抓握动作的意图)或与意图无关的运动学辨别任务(辨别相同动作的峰值手腕高度)之前,分别在两个单独的会议中接受左 IPL 前部和左 IFG 眶额部的 cTBS。我们的目标是针对意图敏感区域,当观察相同的伸手抓握动作时,这些区域的 fMRI 活动可以准确地辨别意图。我们发现,左 IPL 活动的短暂中断,但不是 IFG,会损害观察者将意图归因于动作的能力。相反,与意图无关的运动学辨别在很大程度上不受影响。对单次试验水平上的编码(将意图映射到运动运动学)和读出(将运动学映射到意图选择)如何交叉的计算分析表明,IPL cTBS 并没有降低意图读出对运动运动学的整体敏感性。相反,它选择性地使意图读出与编码失准,从而恶化了从有信息的运动学特征到意图选择的映射。这些结果提供了因果证据,证明了左前 IPL 如何计算从运动学到意图的映射。