Suppr超能文献

沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Zhang Hongzhou, Huang Tieqiu, Shen Wen, Xu Xiuxiu, Yang Pingping, Zhu Dan, Fang Haiyang, Wan Hongbing, Wu Tao, Wu Yanqing, Wu Qinghua

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1, Minde Road, Donghu District, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;7(6):3841-3850. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12974. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

Abstract

AIMS

Sacubitril-valsartan has been shown to have superior effects over angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with heart failure (HF) and hypertension. The efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with HF are controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess and compare the effect and adverse events of sacubitril-valsartan, valsartan, and enalapril in patients with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a systematic search using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomized controlled trials involving the use of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with HF were included. We assessed the pooled odds ratio (OR) of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and hospitalization for HF in fixed-effects models and the pooled risk ratio (RR) of symptomatic hypotension, worsening renal function, and hyperkalaemia in fixed-effects models. Of the 315 identified records, six studies involving 14 959 patients were eligible for inclusion. Sacubitril-valsartan reduced the endpoints of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in three trials with pooled ORs of 0.83 (P = 0.0006) and 0.78 (P < 0.0001), respectively. Regarding the composite outcome of hospitalization for HF in five trials, the pooled OR was 0.79 (P < 0.00001). Compared with enalapril or valsartan, sacubitril-valsartan was associated with a high risk of symptomatic hypotension (RR 1.47, P < 0.00001), low risk of worsening renal function (RR 0.81, P = 0.005), and low rate of serious hyperkalaemia (≥6.0 mmol/L) (RR 0.76, P = 0.0007) in all six trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, sacubitril-valsartan significantly decreased the risk of death from all causes or cardiovascular causes in HFrEF and hospitalization for HF in both patients with HFrEF and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Sacubitril-valsartan reduced the risk of renal dysfunction and serious hyperkalaemia but was associated with more symptomatic hypotension.

摘要

目的

沙库巴曲缬沙坦已被证明在心力衰竭(HF)和高血压患者中比血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂及血管紧张素受体阻滞剂具有更优的效果。沙库巴曲缬沙坦在HF患者中的疗效和安全性存在争议。我们进行了一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析,以评估和比较沙库巴曲缬沙坦、缬沙坦和依那普利在HF患者中的效果及不良事件。

方法与结果

我们使用PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov进行了系统检索。纳入了涉及在HF患者中使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦的随机对照试验。我们在固定效应模型中评估了全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和HF住院的合并比值比(OR),以及在固定效应模型中症状性低血压、肾功能恶化和高钾血症的合并风险比(RR)。在识别出的315条记录中,6项涉及14959名患者的研究符合纳入标准。在三项试验中,沙库巴曲缬沙坦降低了射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率终点,合并OR分别为0.83(P = 0.0006)和0.78(P < 0.0001)。关于五项试验中HF住院的复合结局,合并OR为0.79(P < 0.00001)。在所有六项试验中,与依那普利或缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦与症状性低血压的高风险(RR 1.47,P < 0.00001)、肾功能恶化的低风险(RR 0.81,P = 0.005)和严重高钾血症(≥6.0 mmol/L)的低发生率(RR 0.76,P = 0.0007)相关。

结论

与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦显著降低了HFrEF患者的全因死亡或心血管原因死亡风险以及HFrEF和射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者HF住院的风险。沙库巴曲缬沙坦降低了肾功能不全和严重高钾血症的风险,但与更多的症状性低血压相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6223/7754944/32274ad28eb9/EHF2-7-3841-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验