González-Gil M T, Parro-Moreno A I, Oter-Quintana C, González-Blázquez C, Martínez-Marcos M, Casillas-Santana M, Arlandis-Casanova A, Canalejas-Pérez C
Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain.
Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain.
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Dec;95:104594. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104594. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
The assessment of the acquisition of clinical competencies is a critical issue for nursing students. 360-degree evaluations are a widespread practice in professional competency assessment and can be applied to the learning/teaching process of future nurses.
To determine the effectiveness of the implementation of a 360-degree evaluation proposal for assessing the competencies acquired by third-year nursing students during their clinical placements.
A mixed-methods design was used with a primary component (a cross-sectional descriptive observational design) and a parallel qualitative component.
Sixty-seven third-year nursing students from a public university in Madrid, Spain, who were undertaking their clinical placements during seven weeks in medical/surgical units in hospital settings.
This study was conducted between September 2017 and May 2018. Quantitative data were obtained using assessment tools specifically developed for this 360-degree evaluation proposal. Qualitative information was collected from two focus groups, one with students and one with teaching staff. A descriptive analysis of the quantitative data was conducted. Qualitative data were studied using a thematic analysis.
The mean scores for each of the items in the 360-degree evaluation were high, with the highest grades being observed in the evaluations made by peers and patients (a mean of 9.1 out of 10.0). On average, the 360-degree evaluation method yielded grades 0.067 percentage points higher than did the previous evaluation method (p ≤ 0.001). Students and teaching staff encountered difficulties in the evaluations made by users/families and other members of the healthcare team (nursing assistants and physicians), although they rated the overall proposal as being very powerful in terms of educational value.
The 360-degree evaluation method is an innovative, motivating, and integrating approach to the acquisition of competencies with a focus on excellence.
临床能力获得情况的评估对护理专业学生而言是一个关键问题。360度评估是专业能力评估中广泛应用的一种方法,可应用于未来护士的学习/教学过程。
确定实施360度评估方案以评估三年级护理专业学生在临床实习期间所获得能力的有效性。
采用混合方法设计,主要部分为横断面描述性观察设计,同时并行一个定性部分。
来自西班牙马德里一所公立大学的67名三年级护理专业学生,他们在医院的内科/外科病房进行为期7周的临床实习。
本研究于2017年9月至2018年5月进行。定量数据通过专门为本360度评估方案开发的评估工具获取。定性信息从两个焦点小组收集,一个是学生小组,另一个是教师小组。对定量数据进行描述性分析。定性数据采用主题分析法进行研究。
360度评估中各项目的平均得分较高,其中同伴和患者给出的评价得分最高(平均为9.1分,满分10分)。平均而言,360度评估方法的得分比之前的评估方法高0.067个百分点(p≤0.001)。学生和教师在用户/家属以及医疗团队其他成员(护理助理和医生)给出的评价中遇到了困难,不过他们认为该整体方案在教育价值方面非常有效。
360度评估方法是一种创新、激励性且综合性的能力获得方法,注重追求卓越。