R.A. Kusurkar is professor and research programme leader, Research in Education, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, professor and research programme leader, LEARN! Research Institute for Learning and Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University Amsterdam, and professor and research programme leader, Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9382-0379 .
C. Orsini is associate professor in medical education, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom, and Researcher in Health Professions Education, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Los Andes, Santiago, Chile; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-3625 .
Acad Med. 2023 Sep 1;98(9):1083-1092. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005263. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
In health professions education (HPE), the effect of assessments on student motivation for learning and its consequences have been largely neglected. This is problematic because assessments can hamper motivation and psychological well-being. The research questions guiding this review were: How do assessments affect student motivation for learning in HPE? What outcomes does this lead to in which contexts?
In October 2020, the authors searched PubMed, Embase, APA PsycInfo, ERIC, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection for "assessments" AND "motivation" AND "health professions education/students." Empirical papers or literature reviews investigating the effect of assessments on student motivation for learning in HPE using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods from January 1, 2010, to October 29, 2020, were included. The authors chose the realist synthesis method for data analysis to study the intended and unintended consequences of this complex topic. Assessments were identified as stimulating autonomous or controlled motivation using sensitizing concepts from self-determination theory and data on context-mechanism-outcome were extracted.
Twenty-four of 15,291 articles were ultimately included. Assessments stimulating controlled motivation seemed to have negative outcomes. An example of an assessment that stimulates controlled motivation is one that focuses on factual knowledge (context), which encourages studying only for the assessment (mechanism) and results in surface learning (outcome). Assessments stimulating autonomous motivation seemed to have positive outcomes. An example of an assessment that stimulates autonomous motivation is one that is fun (context), which through active learning (mechanism) leads to higher effort and better connection with the material (outcome).
These findings indicate that students strategically learned what was expected to appear in assessments at the expense of what was needed in practice. Therefore, health professions educators should rethink their assessment philosophy and practices and introduce assessments that are relevant to professional practice and stimulate genuine interest in the content.
在健康专业教育(HPE)中,评估对学生学习动机的影响及其后果在很大程度上被忽视了。这是有问题的,因为评估会阻碍动机和心理健康。本研究的指导问题是:评估如何影响 HPE 中学生的学习动机?在哪些情况下会导致什么结果?
2020 年 10 月,作者在 PubMed、Embase、APA PsycInfo、ERIC、CINAHL 和 Web of Science Core Collection 中搜索了“评估”和“动机”以及“健康专业教育/学生”。纳入了使用定量、定性或混合方法,从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 29 日,调查评估对 HPE 中学生学习动机影响的实证论文或文献综述。作者选择了现实主义综合分析方法来分析这个复杂主题的预期和意外后果。使用自我决定理论的敏感概念和关于背景-机制-结果的数据,确定了激发自主或控制动机的评估。
最终纳入了 15291 篇文章中的 24 篇。激发控制动机的评估似乎有负面结果。激发控制动机的评估的一个例子是,评估侧重于事实知识(背景),鼓励仅为评估而学习(机制),导致表面学习(结果)。激发自主动机的评估似乎有积极的结果。激发自主动机的评估的一个例子是,评估是有趣的(背景),通过主动学习(机制)导致更高的努力和更好地与材料联系(结果)。
这些发现表明,学生有策略地学习了评估中预期出现的内容,而牺牲了实践中需要的内容。因此,健康专业教育者应该重新思考他们的评估理念和实践,并引入与专业实践相关并激发对内容真正兴趣的评估。