Suppr超能文献

双能CT与超声检查在痛风诊断中的性能比较:一项Meta分析

Diagnostic Performance of Dual-energy CT Versus Ultrasonography in Gout: A Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Shang Jin, Zhou Lu-Ping, Wang Huang, Liu Bin

机构信息

Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 210 Jixi Road, Hefei, Anhui 230022, China.

Department of Orthopedics & Spine Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2022 Jan;29(1):56-68. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), along with ultrasound (US), has been increasingly utilized for the diagnosis of gout because of its noninvasive advantages. However, the superiority of DECT over US remains controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether DECT is superior to US in the diagnosis of gout.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted for potentially eligible articles. Studies that evaluated the utility of DECT or US for gout diagnosis were qualified. Two distinctive ultrasonographic features of gout, namely, the double contour sign and the presence of tophus, were also assessed. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 criteria. Besides, the subgroup analyses of early disease duration (≤ 2 years) was also performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DECT were 0.89 (0.80-0.94) and 0.91 (0.88-0.94), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US were 0.70 (0.58-0.79) and 0.95 (0.87-0.98), respectively, for double contour sign; 0.57 (0.38-0.74) and 0.99 (0.88-1.00), respectively, for tophus; and 0.84 (0.73-0.91) and 0.84 (0.78-0.89), respectively, for overall consideration of US signs. At the early disease duration (≤ 2 years), the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (0.60-0.86) and 0.85 (0.75-0.91), respectively, for DECT; 0.93 (0.72-0.99) and 0.80 (0.71-0.86), respectively, for overall consideration of US signs.

CONCLUSION

DECT and US showed promising accuracy for gout diagnosis. DECT has higher sensitivity, specificity, and AUC than overall consideration of US signs and thus has a better diagnostic ability in diagnosing gout. Moreover, the diagnostic sensitivity of DECT is lower than that of overall consideration of US signs at less than 2 years' disease duration.

摘要

目的

双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)与超声(US)一样,因其无创优势越来越多地用于痛风诊断。然而,DECT相对于US的优越性仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在研究DECT在痛风诊断中是否优于US。

方法

全面检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库以查找潜在符合条件的文章。评估DECT或US用于痛风诊断效用的研究符合要求。还评估了痛风两个独特的超声特征,即双轮廓征和痛风石的存在。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2标准评估纳入研究的方法学质量。此外,还对疾病持续时间≤2年的早期疾病进行了亚组分析。

结果

28项研究纳入荟萃分析。DECT的合并敏感度和特异度分别为0.89(0.80-0.94)和0.91(0.88-0.94)。对于双轮廓征,US的合并敏感度和特异度分别为0.70(0.58-0.79)和0.95(0.87-0.98);对于痛风石,分别为0.57(0.38-0.74)和0.99(0.88-1.00);对于US体征的综合考虑,分别为0.84(0.73-0.91)和0.84(0.78-0.89)。在疾病持续时间≤2年的早期疾病中,DECT的合并敏感度和特异度分别为0.75(0.60-0.86)和0.85(0.75-0.91);对于US体征的综合考虑分别为0.93(0.72-0.99)和0.80(0.71-0.86)。

结论

DECT和US在痛风诊断中显示出良好的准确性。DECT比US体征的综合考虑具有更高的敏感度、特异度和AUC,因此在痛风诊断中具有更好的诊断能力。此外,在疾病持续时间小于2年时,DECT的诊断敏感度低于US体征的综合考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验