Suppr超能文献

基于偏好的通用能力幸福感量表(ICECAP - A)在脊髓损伤背景下的实证效度

Empirical Validity of a Generic, Preference-Based Capability Wellbeing Instrument (ICECAP-A) in the Context of Spinal Cord Injury.

作者信息

Mah Cassandra, Noonan Vanessa K, Bryan Stirling, Whitehurst David G T

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Patient. 2021 Mar;14(2):223-240. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00451-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessing the validity of generic instruments across different clinical contexts is an important area of methodological research in economic evaluation and outcomes measurement.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to examine the empirical validity of a generic, preference-based capability wellbeing instrument (ICECAP-A) in the context of spinal cord injury.

METHODS

This study consisted of a secondary analysis of data collected using an online cross-sectional survey. The survey included questions regarding demographics, injury classifications and characteristics, secondary health conditions, quality of life and wellbeing, and functioning in activities of daily living. Analysis comprised the descriptive assessment of Spearman's rank correlations between item-/dimension-level data for the ICECAP-A and four preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, and discriminant and convergent validity approaches to examine 21 evidence-informed or theoretically derived constructs. Constructs were defined using participant and injury characteristics and responses to a range of health, wellbeing and functioning outcomes.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-four individuals completed the survey. Mean index score for the ICECAP-A was 0.761; 12 (3%) individuals reported full capability (upper anchor; score = 1), and there were no reports of zero capabilities (lower anchor; score = 0). The strongest correlations were dominated by items and dimensions on the comparator (HRQoL) instruments that are non-health aspects of quality of life, such as happiness and control over one's life (including self-care). Of 21 hypothesised constructs, 19 were confirmed in statistical tests, the exceptions being the exploratory hypotheses regarding education and age at injury.

CONCLUSION

The ICECAP-A is an empirically valid outcome measure for assessing capability wellbeing in people with spinal cord injury living in a community setting. The extent to which the ICECAP-A provides complementary information to preference-based HRQoL instruments is dependent on the comparator.

摘要

背景

评估通用工具在不同临床背景下的有效性是经济评估和结果测量方法学研究的一个重要领域。

目的

我们的目的是在脊髓损伤背景下检验一种基于偏好的通用能力幸福感工具(ICECAP-A)的实证有效性。

方法

本研究包括对通过在线横断面调查收集的数据进行二次分析。该调查包括有关人口统计学、损伤分类和特征、继发性健康状况、生活质量和幸福感以及日常生活活动功能的问题。分析包括对ICECAP-A的项目/维度水平数据与四种基于偏好的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)工具之间的Spearman等级相关性进行描述性评估,以及采用判别效度和收敛效度方法来检验21个基于证据或理论推导的结构。结构是根据参与者和损伤特征以及对一系列健康、幸福感和功能结果的反应来定义的。

结果

364人完成了调查。ICECAP-A的平均指数得分为0.761;12名(3%)个体报告具有完全能力(上限;得分=1),没有报告能力为零的情况(下限;得分=0)。最强的相关性主要由比较(HRQoL)工具中关于生活质量非健康方面的项目和维度主导,如幸福和对自己生活的掌控(包括自我护理)。在21个假设结构中,有19个在统计检验中得到证实,例外情况是关于教育和受伤年龄的探索性假设。

结论

ICECAP-A是评估社区环境中脊髓损伤患者能力幸福感的一种实证有效的结果测量工具。ICECAP-A为基于偏好的HRQoL工具提供补充信息的程度取决于比较工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验