Whitehurst David G T, Mittmann Nicole, Noonan Vanessa K, Dvorak Marcel F, Bryan Stirling
Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Qual Life Res. 2016 Oct;25(10):2481-2496. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1297-3. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
This study explores variation in health state descriptions and valuations derived from preference-based health-related quality of life instruments in the context of spinal cord injury (SCI).
Individuals living with SCI were invited to complete a web-based, cross-sectional survey. The survey comprised questions regarding demographics, SCI classifications and characteristics, secondary health complications and conditions, quality of life and SCI-specific functioning in activities of daily living. Four preference-based health status classification systems were included; Assessment of Quality of Life 8-dimension questionnaire (AQoL-8D), EQ-5D-5L, Health Utilities Index (HUI) and SF-6D (derived from the SF-36v2). In addition to descriptive comparisons of index scores and item/dimension responses, analyses explored dimension-level correlation and absolute agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)). Subgroup analyses examined the influence of individuals' self-reported ability to walk.
Of 609 invitations, 364 (60 %) individuals completed the survey. Across instruments, convergent validity was seen between pain and mental health dimensions, while sizeable variation pertaining to issues of mobility was observed. Mean index scores were 0.248 (HUI-3), 0.492 (EQ-5D-5L), 0.573 (AQoL-8D) and 0.605 (SF-6D). Agreement ranged from 'slight' (HUI-3 and SF-6D; ICC = 0.124) to 'moderate' (AQoL-8D and SF-6D; ICC = 0.634). Walking status had a markedly different impact on health state valuations across instruments.
Variation in the way that individuals are able to describe their health state across instruments is not unique to SCI. Further research is necessary to understand the significant differences in index scores and, in particular, the implications of framing mobility-related questions in the context of respondents' ability to walk.
本研究探讨在脊髓损伤(SCI)背景下,基于偏好的健康相关生活质量工具得出的健康状态描述和估值的差异。
邀请脊髓损伤患者完成一项基于网络的横断面调查。该调查包括有关人口统计学、脊髓损伤分类和特征、继发性健康并发症和病症、生活质量以及脊髓损伤特定的日常生活活动功能的问题。纳入了四个基于偏好的健康状况分类系统;生活质量评估8维度问卷(AQoL - 8D)、EQ - 5D - 5L、健康效用指数(HUI)和SF - 6D(源自SF - 36v2)。除了对指数得分以及条目/维度反应进行描述性比较外,分析还探讨了维度层面的相关性和绝对一致性(组内相关系数(ICC))。亚组分析考察了个体自我报告的行走能力的影响。
在609份邀请中,364名(60%)个体完成了调查。在所有工具中,疼痛和心理健康维度之间存在收敛效度,而在 mobility 问题上观察到了相当大的差异。平均指数得分分别为0.248(HUI - 3)、0.492(EQ - 5D - 5L)、0.573(AQoL - 8D)和0.605(SF - 6D)。一致性范围从“轻微”(HUI - 3和SF - 6D;ICC = 0.124)到“中等”(AQoL - 8D和SF - 6D;ICC = 0.634)。行走状态对不同工具的健康状态估值有明显不同的影响。
个体跨工具描述其健康状态的方式存在差异并非脊髓损伤所特有。有必要进行进一步研究以了解指数得分的显著差异,特别是在受访者行走能力背景下构建与 mobility 相关问题的影响。