Warner Mildred E, Zhang Xue, Rivas Marcela González
Cornell University, Department of City and Regional Planning, Ithaca, NY, USA.
University of Pittsburg, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Util Policy. 2020 Dec;67:101118. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2020.101118. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
Many U.S. states and cities have imposed water disconnection moratoriums during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using logistic and Cox Proportional-Hazards models, we assess factors that differentiate which governments imposed moratoriums. States, which have economic regulation of private water utilities, were more likely to impose moratoriums, and those with higher COVID-19 case rates imposed moratoriums earlier. States with unified Republican Control and cities with more 2016 Trump voters were less likely to impose moratoriums on water disconnection. Cities in states without statewide moratoriums, were more likely to impose moratoriums if they had higher income, more minority residents, and more income inequality.
在新冠疫情期间,美国许多州和城市都实施了暂停停水的措施。我们使用逻辑回归模型和Cox比例风险模型,评估了区分哪些政府实施了暂停措施的因素。对私人供水公司有经济监管的州更有可能实施暂停措施,新冠病例率较高的州更早实施了暂停措施。由共和党统一控制的州以及2016年特朗普选民较多的城市实施停水暂停措施的可能性较小。在没有全州范围暂停措施的州中,收入较高、少数族裔居民较多且收入不平等程度较高的城市更有可能实施暂停措施。