• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老龄化友好型规划能否促进美国农村-城市鸿沟社区健康公平?

Can Age-Friendly Planning Promote Equity in Community Health Across the Rural-Urban Divide in the US?

机构信息

Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Department of Human Development, Roybal Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1275. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041275.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17041275
PMID:32079197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068446/
Abstract

In the US, rural communities face challenges to meet the community health needs of older adults and children. Meanwhile, rural areas lag in age-friendly built environment and services. AARP, a US based organization promoting livability for all ages, has developed a Livability Index based on the World Health Organization's (WHO) domains of age-friendly communities: health, housing, neighborhood, transportation, environment, engagement, and opportunity. This study links the 2018 AARP Livability Index categories with demographic structure and socio-economic factors from the American Community Survey at the county level in the US to examine if the physical, built and social environment differentiate communities with better community health across the rural-urban divide. Results show that the neighborhood built environment has the largest impact on community health for all county types. Although rural areas lag in community health, those which give more attention to engagement and opportunity rank higher. Rural communities with more African Americans, children, and poor Whites, rank lower on community health. While neighborhood characteristics have the strongest link to community health, a broader approach with attention to age, race, poverty and engagement and opportunity is needed for rural areas.

摘要

在美国,农村社区面临着满足老年人和儿童社区健康需求的挑战。与此同时,农村地区在适合老年人居住的建筑环境和服务方面落后。总部设在美国的促进所有年龄段宜居性的组织 AARP 根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的友好社区领域制定了宜居指数:健康、住房、邻里、交通、环境、参与和机会。本研究将 2018 年 AARP 宜居指数类别与美国县一级的美国社区调查中的人口结构和社会经济因素联系起来,以检验物理、建筑和社会环境是否可以区分城乡差距中社区健康状况更好的社区。结果表明,邻里建筑环境对所有县类型的社区健康都有最大的影响。尽管农村地区的社区健康状况较差,但那些更加关注参与和机会的地区排名更高。拥有更多非裔美国人、儿童和贫困白人的农村社区在社区健康方面的排名较低。虽然邻里特征与社区健康有最强的联系,但农村地区需要更广泛的方法,关注年龄、种族、贫困以及参与和机会。

相似文献

1
Can Age-Friendly Planning Promote Equity in Community Health Across the Rural-Urban Divide in the US?老龄化友好型规划能否促进美国农村-城市鸿沟社区健康公平?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1275. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041275.
2
Examining the relationship between communities' 'age-friendliness' and life satisfaction and self-perceived health in rural Manitoba, Canada.研究加拿大曼尼托巴省农村地区社区的“对老年人友好程度”与生活满意度及自我认知健康之间的关系。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14:2594. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
3
Differences in Health Care, Family, and Community Factors Associated with Mental, Behavioral, and Developmental Disorders Among Children Aged 2-8 Years in Rural and Urban Areas - United States, 2011-2012.2011 - 2012年美国城乡2至8岁儿童心理健康、行为及发育障碍相关的医疗保健、家庭和社区因素差异
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(8):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6608a1.
4
The Age-Friendly Community Policy Movement and the Residential Location of U.S. Older Adults: The Case of Hamilton County, Ohio.《老年友好社区政策运动与美国老年人的居住区位:以俄亥俄州汉密尔顿县为例》
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Jul;41(7):1722-1732. doi: 10.1177/07334648221085462. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
5
engAGE in Community: Using Mixed Methods to Mobilize Older People to Elucidate the Age-Friendly Attributes of Urban and Rural Places.参与社区:运用混合方法动员老年人以阐明城乡地区的老年友好型特征。
J Appl Gerontol. 2016 Oct;35(10):1095-120. doi: 10.1177/0733464814566679. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
6
Social determinants of health among African Americans in a rural community in the Deep South: an ecological exploration.美国南部腹地一个农村社区中非洲裔美国人的健康社会决定因素:一项生态探索。
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(1):1634. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
7
Associations between neighborhood characteristics and physical activity among youth within rural-urban commuting areas in the US.城乡通勤区青少年的邻里特征与身体活动之间的关联。
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Dec;16 Suppl 2(0 2):258-67. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1188-3.
8
Rural-Urban Disparities in Obesity Prevalence Among Working Age Adults in the United States: Exploring the Mechanisms.美国劳动年龄成年人肥胖患病率的城乡差异:探究其机制
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Feb;32(2):400-408. doi: 10.1177/0890117116689488. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Linking Urban Planning, Community Environment, and Physical Activity: A Socio-Ecological Approach.将城市规划、社区环境与身体活动联系起来:一种社会生态方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 8;20(4):2944. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042944.
10
Measurement Indicators of Age-Friendly Communities: Findings From the AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey.适老社区的衡量指标:来自 AARP 适老社区调查的发现。
Gerontologist. 2022 Jan 14;62(1):e17-e27. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab055.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Life Satisfaction and Health for Rural And Non-rural Older Adults in the United States.美国农村和非农村老年人生活满意度与健康状况的变化
J Rural Community Dev. 2023;18(4):44-61. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
2
School-Based Health Centers and the Utilization of Primary Care in Rural Communities.以学校为基础的健康中心与农村社区初级保健的利用情况
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jun 28;69(4):107962. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107962.
3
School-based health centers as an approach to address health disparities among rural youth: A study protocol for a multilevel research framework.以学校为基础的健康中心作为解决农村青年健康差异的一种方法:一个多层次研究框架的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0303660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303660. eCollection 2024.
4
Sustainable Involvement of Family Physicians for Improving Help-Seeking Behaviors in Rural Communities: A Thematic Analysis.家庭医生持续参与改善农村社区求助行为的主题分析
Cureus. 2023 Dec 18;15(12):e50740. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50740. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Age-Friendly Cities in Latin America: A Human Ecological Framework.拉丁美洲的友好型城市:一个人类生态框架。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;8(3):46. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8030046.
6
Rural age-friendly ecosystems for older adults: An international scoping review with recommendations to support age-friendly communities.面向老年人的农村友好型生态系统:一项国际范围综述及支持友好型社区的建议
Health Sci Rep. 2023 May 5;6(5):e1241. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1241. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Linking Urban Planning, Community Environment, and Physical Activity: A Socio-Ecological Approach.将城市规划、社区环境与身体活动联系起来:一种社会生态方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 8;20(4):2944. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042944.
8
Age-Friendly Communities and Older Adults' Health in the United States.美国的宜居社区与老年人健康
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;19(15):9292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159292.
9
Measurement Indicators of Age-Friendly Communities: Findings From the AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey.适老社区的衡量指标:来自 AARP 适老社区调查的发现。
Gerontologist. 2022 Jan 14;62(1):e17-e27. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab055.
10
COVID-19 Policy Differences across US States: Shutdowns, Reopening, and Mask Mandates.美国各州的 COVID-19 政策差异:关闭、重新开放和口罩强制令。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;17(24):9520. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249520.

本文引用的文献

1
'It Shouldn't Be This Hard': Exploring the Challenges of Rural Health Research.“这不该这么难”:探索农村卫生研究的挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 22;16(23):4643. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234643.
2
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Mortality: Contributions and Variations by Rurality in the United States, 2012⁻2015.美国 2012-2015 年的死亡率存在种族/民族差异:农村和城市的差异及其原因。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 2;16(3):436. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030436.
3
Social Determinants of Rural Health Workforce Retention: A Scoping Review.农村卫生人力保留的社会决定因素:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 24;16(3):314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030314.
4
A Cross-Sectional Investigation of the Importance of Park Features for Promoting Regular Physical Activity in Parks.公园特征对促进公园内规律身体活动重要性的横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 2;14(11):1335. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111335.
5
Variations in Obesity Rates between US Counties: Impacts of Activity Access, Food Environments, and Settlement Patterns.美国各县肥胖率的差异:活动可达性、食物环境和居住模式的影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 7;14(9):1023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091023.
6
A Demographic Deficit? Local Population Aging and Access to Services in Rural America, 1990-2010.人口赤字?1990 - 2010年美国农村地区的当地人口老龄化与服务可及性
Rural Sociol. 2017 Mar;82(1):44-74. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12117. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
The business cycle and mortality: Urban versus rural counties.经济周期与死亡率:城市与农村县对比
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;175:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.023. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
8
Racial and ethnic residential segregation and access to health care in rural areas.农村地区的种族和民族居住隔离与医疗保健可及性
Health Place. 2017 Jan;43:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
9
City planning and population health: a global challenge.城市规划与人群健康:全球性挑战。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2912-2924. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
10
Cross-sector analysis of socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and urban/rural disparities in food policy enactment in the United States.美国食品政策制定中社会经济、种族/民族及城乡差异的跨部门分析
Health Place. 2016 Nov;42:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Sep 14.