Suppr超能文献

新冠病毒病接触者追踪技术:使用的可接受性与伦理问题

COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: Acceptability and Ethical Issues of Use.

作者信息

Abuhammad Sawsan, Khabour Omar F, Alzoubi Karem H

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.

Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Sep 18;14:1639-1647. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S276183. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The contact-tracing COVID-19 technology allows for tracing people that come in contact to individuals with COVID-19 wherever they are located. The number of tracing COVID-19 infection technology and devices is rapidly increasing. This has prompted many researchers to study the acceptability and ethical issues related to the implementation of such technology.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to determine the acceptability of COVID-19 contact-tracing technology and ethical issues of use.

METHODS

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was used. The target population was Jordanian adults (>18 years). The survey was distributed to a convenience sample of 2000 general public in Jordan.

RESULTS

The results found that the number of people who accept to use COVID-19 contact-tracing technology was 71.6%. However, the percentage of people who were using this technology was 37.8. The main ethical concerns for many of participants were privacy, voluntariness, and beneficence of the data. Only income and living area were predictors for acceptability and use of tracing technology (p≤ 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The majority of Jordanians accept the implementation of contact-tracing technology for COVID-19 infection. Among ethical concerns of the implementation of such technology were privacy, beneficence and voluntariness.

IMPLICATIONS

The results of this study would help in improving the state of science regarding acceptability to use contact-tracing technology for health purposes. Moreover, the present findings provide evidence of predictors of acceptance and ethical concerns among Jordanian population about COVID-19 contact-tracing technology.

摘要

背景

新冠病毒接触者追踪技术能够追踪与新冠病毒感染者有过接触的人员,无论这些感染者身处何地。追踪新冠病毒感染的技术和设备数量正在迅速增加。这促使许多研究人员研究此类技术实施过程中涉及的可接受性和伦理问题。

目的

本研究旨在确定新冠病毒接触者追踪技术的可接受性以及使用过程中的伦理问题。

方法

采用基于问卷调查的横断面研究。目标人群为约旦成年人(>18岁)。该调查面向约旦2000名普通公众的便利样本进行发放。

结果

结果发现,接受使用新冠病毒接触者追踪技术的人数占71.6%。然而,正在使用该技术的人数比例为37.8%。许多参与者主要关注的伦理问题是数据的隐私性、自愿性和有益性。只有收入和居住地区是追踪技术可接受性和使用情况的预测因素(p≤0.01)。

结论

大多数约旦人接受实施用于新冠病毒感染的接触者追踪技术。在实施此类技术的伦理问题中,包括隐私、有益性和自愿性。

启示

本研究结果将有助于改善关于出于健康目的使用接触者追踪技术的可接受性方面的科学状况。此外,目前的研究结果提供了约旦人群中关于新冠病毒接触者追踪技术接受度预测因素及伦理问题的证据。

相似文献

1
COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: Acceptability and Ethical Issues of Use.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Sep 18;14:1639-1647. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S276183. eCollection 2020.
2
Tracing app technology: an ethical review in the COVID-19 era and directions for post-COVID-19.
Ethics Inf Technol. 2022;24(3):30. doi: 10.1007/s10676-022-09659-6. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
6
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
7
Integrating emerging technologies into COVID-19 contact tracing: Opportunities, challenges and pitfalls.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Nov-Dec;14(6):1631-1636. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Contact tracing strategies for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 9;5(5):e0004579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004579. eCollection 2025.
3
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on tobacco use: A population-based study.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287375. eCollection 2023.
6
Response to COVID-19 in Lebanon: update, challenges and lessons learned.
Epidemiol Infect. 2023 Jan 16;151:e23. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823000067.
7
Knowledge toward COVID-19 in children among undergraduate students at the beginning of COVID-19 era.
Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):3579-3585. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1600. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
10
Preparing for Future Pandemics: Challenges for Healthcare Leadership.
J Healthc Leadersh. 2022 Sep 12;14:131-136. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S363650. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of lockdown on air quality in India during COVID-19 pandemic.
Air Qual Atmos Health. 2020;13(8):921-928. doi: 10.1007/s11869-020-00863-1. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
3
Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps.
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7810):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01578-0.
4
Ethics and governance for digital disease surveillance.
Science. 2020 May 29;368(6494):951-954. doi: 10.1126/science.abb9045. Epub 2020 May 11.
5
Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic.
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):427-431. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106314. Epub 2020 May 4.
6
Teledermatology in the wake of COVID-19: Advantages and challenges to continued care in a time of disarray.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jul;83(1):168-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.080. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
7
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing.
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491). doi: 10.1126/science.abb6936. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
8
Balancing health privacy, health information exchange, and research in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):963-966. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa039.
9
Covid-19: Researchers launch app to track spread of symptoms in the UK.
BMJ. 2020 Mar 27;368:m1263. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1263.
10
COVID-19 epidemic in Switzerland: on the importance of testing, contact tracing and isolation.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Mar 19;150:w20225. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20225. eCollection 2020 Mar 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验