• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: Acceptability and Ethical Issues of Use.新冠病毒病接触者追踪技术:使用的可接受性与伦理问题
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Sep 18;14:1639-1647. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S276183. eCollection 2020.
2
Tracing app technology: an ethical review in the COVID-19 era and directions for post-COVID-19.追踪应用程序技术:COVID-19 时代的伦理审查及 COVID-19 后发展方向
Ethics Inf Technol. 2022;24(3):30. doi: 10.1007/s10676-022-09659-6. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
3
Views and Needs of Students, Parents, and Teachers on Closed-Circuit Television, Proximity Trackers, and Access Cards to Facilitate COVID-19 Contact Tracing in Schools: Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups and Interviews.学生、家长和教师对闭路电视、近距离追踪器及门禁卡以助力学校新冠病毒接触者追踪的看法与需求:焦点小组和访谈的主题分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 22;7:e44592. doi: 10.2196/44592.
4
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
5
The Roles of Trust in Government and Sense of Community in the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Privacy Calculus: Mixed Method Study Using a 2-Wave Survey and In-Depth Interviews.信任政府和社区意识在 COVID-19 接触者追踪隐私计算中的作用:使用两波调查和深入访谈的混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 7;12:e48986. doi: 10.2196/48986.
6
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
7
Integrating emerging technologies into COVID-19 contact tracing: Opportunities, challenges and pitfalls.将新兴技术融入 COVID-19 接触者追踪:机遇、挑战和陷阱。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Nov-Dec;14(6):1631-1636. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
8
Utilizing Health Behavior Change and Technology Acceptance Models to Predict the Adoption of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Cross-sectional Survey Study.利用健康行为改变和技术接受模型预测 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的采用:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 19;23(5):e25447. doi: 10.2196/25447.
9
Acceptability and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Applications: A Case Study in Saudi Arabia of the Tawakkalna Application.新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序的可接受性与有效性:以沙特阿拉伯的“塔瓦卡尔纳”应用程序为例
Cureus. 2023 Feb 15;15(2):e35041. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35041. eCollection 2023 Feb.
10
Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.德语国家对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的早期看法:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25525. doi: 10.2196/25525.

引用本文的文献

1
Contact tracing strategies for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review.传染病接触者追踪策略:一项系统文献综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 9;5(5):e0004579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004579. eCollection 2025.
2
An Examination of Responses to COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Efforts in Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx Communities of Los Angeles.对洛杉矶黑人/非裔美国人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区新冠病毒接触者追踪工作回应的考察
Health Equity. 2024 Aug 7;8(1):493-504. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0243. eCollection 2024.
3
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on tobacco use: A population-based study.COVID-19 大流行对烟草使用的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287375. eCollection 2023.
4
The Implications of Using Digital Technologies in the Management of COVID-19: Comparative Study of Japan and South Korea.数字技术在 COVID-19 管理中的应用意义:日本和韩国的比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 6;25:e45705. doi: 10.2196/45705.
5
User Compliance With the Health Emergency and Disaster Management System: Systematic Literature Review.用户对卫生应急和灾害管理系统的遵从性:系统文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 5;25:e41168. doi: 10.2196/41168.
6
Response to COVID-19 in Lebanon: update, challenges and lessons learned.黎巴嫩应对 COVID-19 的情况:更新、挑战和经验教训。
Epidemiol Infect. 2023 Jan 16;151:e23. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823000067.
7
Knowledge toward COVID-19 in children among undergraduate students at the beginning of COVID-19 era.COVID-19 时代初期本科生对儿童 COVID-19 的认知。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):3579-3585. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1600. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
8
What makes people install a COVID-19 contact-tracing app? Understanding the influence of app design and individual difference on contact-tracing app adoption intention.是什么促使人们安装新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序?了解应用程序设计和个体差异对接触者追踪应用程序采用意愿的影响。
Pervasive Mob Comput. 2021 Aug;75:101439. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2021.101439. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
9
Exploring the scope and utility of digital proximity tracing in the effective containment of COVID-19 infection: A narrative review.探索数字近距离追踪在有效遏制新冠病毒感染中的范围和效用:一项叙述性综述。
Germs. 2022 Jun 30;12(2):276-282. doi: 10.18683/germs.2022.1329. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Preparing for Future Pandemics: Challenges for Healthcare Leadership.为未来的大流行病做准备:医疗保健领导力面临的挑战。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2022 Sep 12;14:131-136. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S363650. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of lockdown on air quality in India during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间封锁措施对印度空气质量的影响。
Air Qual Atmos Health. 2020;13(8):921-928. doi: 10.1007/s11869-020-00863-1. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
A Systematic Review of Smartphone Applications Available for Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID19) and the Assessment of their Quality Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).用于 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID19) 的智能手机应用程序的系统评价及使用移动应用程序评级量表 (MARS) 对其质量的评估。
J Med Syst. 2020 Aug 10;44(9):164. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01633-3.
3
Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps.新冠病毒追踪应用程序的伦理准则。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7810):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01578-0.
4
Ethics and governance for digital disease surveillance.数字疾病监测的伦理与治理
Science. 2020 May 29;368(6494):951-954. doi: 10.1126/science.abb9045. Epub 2020 May 11.
5
Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic.利用手机应用程序进行即时接触者追踪以控制 COVID-19 大流行的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):427-431. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106314. Epub 2020 May 4.
6
Teledermatology in the wake of COVID-19: Advantages and challenges to continued care in a time of disarray.新冠疫情下的远程皮肤病学:在混乱时期持续护理的优势与挑战
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jul;83(1):168-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.080. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
7
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing.量化 SARS-CoV-2 传播表明数字接触者追踪可控制疫情。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491). doi: 10.1126/science.abb6936. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
8
Balancing health privacy, health information exchange, and research in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行背景下平衡健康隐私、健康信息交换和研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):963-966. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa039.
9
Covid-19: Researchers launch app to track spread of symptoms in the UK.新冠疫情:研究人员推出应用程序以追踪英国症状传播情况。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 27;368:m1263. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1263.
10
COVID-19 epidemic in Switzerland: on the importance of testing, contact tracing and isolation.瑞士的 COVID-19 疫情:关于检测、接触者追踪和隔离的重要性。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Mar 19;150:w20225. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20225. eCollection 2020 Mar 9.

新冠病毒病接触者追踪技术:使用的可接受性与伦理问题

COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: Acceptability and Ethical Issues of Use.

作者信息

Abuhammad Sawsan, Khabour Omar F, Alzoubi Karem H

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.

Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Sep 18;14:1639-1647. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S276183. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S276183
PMID:32982188
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7509307/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The contact-tracing COVID-19 technology allows for tracing people that come in contact to individuals with COVID-19 wherever they are located. The number of tracing COVID-19 infection technology and devices is rapidly increasing. This has prompted many researchers to study the acceptability and ethical issues related to the implementation of such technology.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to determine the acceptability of COVID-19 contact-tracing technology and ethical issues of use.

METHODS

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was used. The target population was Jordanian adults (>18 years). The survey was distributed to a convenience sample of 2000 general public in Jordan.

RESULTS

The results found that the number of people who accept to use COVID-19 contact-tracing technology was 71.6%. However, the percentage of people who were using this technology was 37.8. The main ethical concerns for many of participants were privacy, voluntariness, and beneficence of the data. Only income and living area were predictors for acceptability and use of tracing technology (p≤ 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The majority of Jordanians accept the implementation of contact-tracing technology for COVID-19 infection. Among ethical concerns of the implementation of such technology were privacy, beneficence and voluntariness.

IMPLICATIONS

The results of this study would help in improving the state of science regarding acceptability to use contact-tracing technology for health purposes. Moreover, the present findings provide evidence of predictors of acceptance and ethical concerns among Jordanian population about COVID-19 contact-tracing technology.

摘要

背景

新冠病毒接触者追踪技术能够追踪与新冠病毒感染者有过接触的人员,无论这些感染者身处何地。追踪新冠病毒感染的技术和设备数量正在迅速增加。这促使许多研究人员研究此类技术实施过程中涉及的可接受性和伦理问题。

目的

本研究旨在确定新冠病毒接触者追踪技术的可接受性以及使用过程中的伦理问题。

方法

采用基于问卷调查的横断面研究。目标人群为约旦成年人(>18岁)。该调查面向约旦2000名普通公众的便利样本进行发放。

结果

结果发现,接受使用新冠病毒接触者追踪技术的人数占71.6%。然而,正在使用该技术的人数比例为37.8%。许多参与者主要关注的伦理问题是数据的隐私性、自愿性和有益性。只有收入和居住地区是追踪技术可接受性和使用情况的预测因素(p≤0.01)。

结论

大多数约旦人接受实施用于新冠病毒感染的接触者追踪技术。在实施此类技术的伦理问题中,包括隐私、有益性和自愿性。

启示

本研究结果将有助于改善关于出于健康目的使用接触者追踪技术的可接受性方面的科学状况。此外,目前的研究结果提供了约旦人群中关于新冠病毒接触者追踪技术接受度预测因素及伦理问题的证据。